Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] phy: phy-core: Make GENERIC_PHY an invisible option
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 06:07:18PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: Tejun, Maxime, Sylwester, Kyungmin On Thursday 23 April 2015 04:34 AM, Arun Ramamurthy wrote: Most of the phy providers use select to enable GENERIC_PHY. Since select is only recommended when the config is not visible, GENERIC_PHY is changed an invisible option. To maintain consistency, all phy providers are changed to select GENERIC_PHY and all non-phy drivers use depends on when the phy framework is explicity required. USB_MUSB_OMAP2PLUS has a cyclic dependency, so it is left as select. Signed-off-by: Arun Ramamurthy arun.ramamur...@broadcom.com Need your ACK for this patch. For ATA part, Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata codes
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:23AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: This patch removes support for s5pc100 ata because of no more support S5PC100 SoC in mainline. Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com Cc: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org Applied to libata/for-3.17. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pata_samsung_cf: fix ata_host_activate() failure handling
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:52:44PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Add missing clk_disable() call to ata_host_activate() failure path. Cc: Ben Dooks ben-li...@fluff.org Cc: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com Applied to libata/for-3.15-fixes. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 39/51] DMA-API: others: use dma_set_coherent_mask()
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Russell King wrote: The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only arch and bus code should access this member directly. Convert all direct write accesses to using the correct API. Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org The patch is pretty widely spread. I don't mind how it gets routed but what's the plan? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 39/51] DMA-API: others: use dma_set_coherent_mask()
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:16:52AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Russell King wrote: The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only arch and bus code should access this member directly. Convert all direct write accesses to using the correct API. Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org The patch is pretty widely spread. I don't mind how it gets routed but what's the plan? Hmm... maybe hte pata_ixp4xx_cf.c part should be moved to the one which updates pata_octeon_cf.c? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 39/51] DMA-API: others: use dma_set_coherent_mask()
Hey, On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:00:18PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: Another would be if subsystem maintainers are happy that I carry them, I can add the acks, and then later on towards the end of the cycle, provide a branch subsystem maintainers could pull. Or... if you can think of something easier... I'm happy with the latter method and it's likely that you'll end up carrying at least some of the patches through your tree anyway. Please feel free to add my acks to all libata related patches and carry them through your tree. Thanks and have fun routing. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 4/4] pata_samsung: Add Samsung PATA controller driver
Hello,
On 05/27/2010 10:22 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
From: Abhilash Kesavan a.kesa...@samsung.com
Adds support for the Samsung PATA controller. This driver is based on the
Libata subsystem and references the earlier patches sent for IDE subsystem.
Just one small thing.
+static struct ata_port_operations pata_s3c_port_ops = {
+ .inherits = ata_sff_port_ops,
+ .sff_check_status = pata_s3c_check_status,
+ .sff_tf_load= pata_s3c_tf_load,
+ .sff_tf_read= pata_s3c_tf_read,
+ .sff_data_xfer = pata_s3c_data_xfer,
+ .sff_exec_command = pata_s3c_exec_command,
+ .qc_prep= ata_noop_qc_prep,
+ .set_piomode= pata_s3c_set_piomode,
+};
+
+static struct ata_port_operations pata_s5p_port_ops = {
+ .inherits = ata_sff_port_ops,
+ .qc_prep= ata_noop_qc_prep,
+ .set_piomode= pata_s3c_set_piomode,
+};
You don't need to override .qc_prep to ata_noop_qc_prep() and can you
please base the patch against the current libata-dev#upstream?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
