Re: [PATCH 03/16] pinctrl: samsung: Detect and handle unsupported configuration types
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote: This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to detect when width of a bit field is set to zero (which means that such configuraton type is not supported) and return an error instead of trying to modify an inexistent register. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index dd108a9..c660fa5 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c @@ -391,6 +391,9 @@ static int samsung_pinconf_rw(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin, return -EINVAL; } + if (!width) + return -EINVAL; + Can this patch be applied in isolation from the others? Thomas A: can you ACK this so I can apply it in that case? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 03/16] pinctrl: samsung: Detect and handle unsupported configuration types
On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:37:42 Linus Walleij wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com wrote: This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to detect when width of a bit field is set to zero (which means that such configuraton type is not supported) and return an error instead of trying to modify an inexistent register. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index dd108a9..c660fa5 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c @@ -391,6 +391,9 @@ static int samsung_pinconf_rw(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin, return -EINVAL; } + if (!width) + return -EINVAL; + Can this patch be applied in isolation from the others? Yes, I don't see any problem here. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland RD Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH 03/16] pinctrl: samsung: Detect and handle unsupported configuration types
This patch modifies the pinctrl-samsung driver to detect when width of a bit field is set to zero (which means that such configuraton type is not supported) and return an error instead of trying to modify an inexistent register. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa t.f...@samsung.com --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index dd108a9..c660fa5 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c @@ -391,6 +391,9 @@ static int samsung_pinconf_rw(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin, return -EINVAL; } + if (!width) + return -EINVAL; + mask = (1 width) - 1; shift = pin_offset * width; data = readl(reg_base + cfg_reg); -- 1.7.12 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
