Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 2/5] charger: tps65090: Allow charger module to be used when no irq
Anton, On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:51:28AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: >> > All the rest of this series has been acked and applied. Do you have >> > time to review this patch? >> > >> > Thanks! :) >> >> FWIW, I've seen very little email traffic from Anton this year, he >> might have limited time for maintainership at the moment. > > Yup. > > commit 573189354b7c97cd2256b87cf083ee435584594e > Author: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > Date: Tue Jan 21 03:33:09 2014 +0400 > > MAINTAINERS: Pick up power supply maintainership > > Anton stated that he would have to abandon power supply maintainership > due to the lack of time. By agreement with him and David, pick up power > supply tree. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov Doh, thanks for the pointer. Dmitry: you were CCed on the patch. Do you still have it in your email somewhere? I'm happy to repost it with you in the "To" line if it's helpful. Thanks! :) -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 2/5] charger: tps65090: Allow charger module to be used when no irq
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:51:28AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > All the rest of this series has been acked and applied. Do you have > > time to review this patch? > > > > Thanks! :) > > FWIW, I've seen very little email traffic from Anton this year, he > might have limited time for maintainership at the moment. Yup. commit 573189354b7c97cd2256b87cf083ee435584594e Author: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Date: Tue Jan 21 03:33:09 2014 +0400 MAINTAINERS: Pick up power supply maintainership Anton stated that he would have to abandon power supply maintainership due to the lack of time. By agreement with him and David, pick up power supply tree. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 2/5] charger: tps65090: Allow charger module to be used when no irq
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Anton, > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> On the ARM Chromebook tps65090 has two masters: the AP (the main >> processor running linux) and the EC (the embedded controller). The AP >> is allowed to mess with FETs but the EC is in charge of charge control. >> >> The tps65090 interupt line is routed to both the AP and the EC, which >> can cause quite a headache. Having two people adjusting masks and >> acking interrupts is a recipe for disaster. >> >> In the shipping kernel we had a hack to have the AP pay attention to >> the IRQ but not to ack it. It also wasn't supposed to configure the >> IRQ in any way. That hack allowed us to detect when the device was >> charging without messing with the EC's state. >> >> The current tps65090 infrastructure makes the above difficult, and it >> was a bit of a hack to begin with. Rather than uglify the driver to >> support it, just extend the driver's existing notion of "no irq" to >> the charger. This makes the charger code poll every 2 seconds for AC >> detect, which is sufficient. >> >> For proper functioning, requires (mfd: tps65090: Don't tell child >> devices we have an IRQ if we don't). If we don't have that patch >> we'll simply fail to probe on devices without an interrupt (just like >> we did before this patch). >> >> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson >> --- >> Changes in v3: None >> Changes in v2: >> - Split noirq (polling mode) changes into MFD and charger >> >> drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c | 76 >> +++- >> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > All the rest of this series has been acked and applied. Do you have > time to review this patch? > > Thanks! :) FWIW, I've seen very little email traffic from Anton this year, he might have limited time for maintainership at the moment. Usually what we do in these cases is that we give the maintainer as much time as possible, but eventually if there's no action, and the patches look reasonable, we apply them with the maintainer on Cc: line in the signed-offs. Or we send them to/through akpm, which tends to be the catch-all for high-latency maintainers, etc. Since this patch isn't holding anything up, let's give Anton as much time as possible to review, and revisit in ~2 weeks (so it has time to land somewhere in time for the merge window). -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 2/5] charger: tps65090: Allow charger module to be used when no irq
Anton, On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > On the ARM Chromebook tps65090 has two masters: the AP (the main > processor running linux) and the EC (the embedded controller). The AP > is allowed to mess with FETs but the EC is in charge of charge control. > > The tps65090 interupt line is routed to both the AP and the EC, which > can cause quite a headache. Having two people adjusting masks and > acking interrupts is a recipe for disaster. > > In the shipping kernel we had a hack to have the AP pay attention to > the IRQ but not to ack it. It also wasn't supposed to configure the > IRQ in any way. That hack allowed us to detect when the device was > charging without messing with the EC's state. > > The current tps65090 infrastructure makes the above difficult, and it > was a bit of a hack to begin with. Rather than uglify the driver to > support it, just extend the driver's existing notion of "no irq" to > the charger. This makes the charger code poll every 2 seconds for AC > detect, which is sufficient. > > For proper functioning, requires (mfd: tps65090: Don't tell child > devices we have an IRQ if we don't). If we don't have that patch > we'll simply fail to probe on devices without an interrupt (just like > we did before this patch). > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson > --- > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: > - Split noirq (polling mode) changes into MFD and charger > > drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c | 76 > +++- > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) All the rest of this series has been acked and applied. Do you have time to review this patch? Thanks! :) -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[RESEND PATCH v3 2/5] charger: tps65090: Allow charger module to be used when no irq
On the ARM Chromebook tps65090 has two masters: the AP (the main
processor running linux) and the EC (the embedded controller). The AP
is allowed to mess with FETs but the EC is in charge of charge control.
The tps65090 interupt line is routed to both the AP and the EC, which
can cause quite a headache. Having two people adjusting masks and
acking interrupts is a recipe for disaster.
In the shipping kernel we had a hack to have the AP pay attention to
the IRQ but not to ack it. It also wasn't supposed to configure the
IRQ in any way. That hack allowed us to detect when the device was
charging without messing with the EC's state.
The current tps65090 infrastructure makes the above difficult, and it
was a bit of a hack to begin with. Rather than uglify the driver to
support it, just extend the driver's existing notion of "no irq" to
the charger. This makes the charger code poll every 2 seconds for AC
detect, which is sufficient.
For proper functioning, requires (mfd: tps65090: Don't tell child
devices we have an IRQ if we don't). If we don't have that patch
we'll simply fail to probe on devices without an interrupt (just like
we did before this patch).
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson
---
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2:
- Split noirq (polling mode) changes into MFD and charger
drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c | 76 +++-
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c b/drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c
index 8fc9d6d..cc26c12 100644
--- a/drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c
+++ b/drivers/power/tps65090-charger.c
@@ -17,9 +17,11 @@
*/
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -43,11 +45,15 @@
#define TPS65090_VACG BIT(1)
#define TPS65090_NOITERM BIT(5)
+#define POLL_INTERVAL (HZ * 2)/* Used when no irq */
+
struct tps65090_charger {
struct device *dev;
int ac_online;
int prev_ac_online;
int irq;
+ struct task_struct *poll_task;
+ boolpassive_mode;
struct power_supply ac;
struct tps65090_platform_data *pdata;
};
@@ -60,6 +66,9 @@ static int tps65090_low_chrg_current(struct tps65090_charger
*charger)
{
int ret;
+ if (charger->passive_mode)
+ return 0;
+
ret = tps65090_write(charger->dev->parent, TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL5,
TPS65090_NOITERM);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -75,6 +84,9 @@ static int tps65090_enable_charging(struct tps65090_charger
*charger)
int ret;
uint8_t ctrl0 = 0;
+ if (charger->passive_mode)
+ return 0;
+
ret = tps65090_read(charger->dev->parent, TPS65090_REG_CG_CTRL0,
&ctrl0);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -98,6 +110,9 @@ static int tps65090_config_charger(struct tps65090_charger
*charger)
uint8_t intrmask = 0;
int ret;
+ if (charger->passive_mode)
+ return 0;
+
if (charger->pdata->enable_low_current_chrg) {
ret = tps65090_low_chrg_current(charger);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -175,10 +190,14 @@ static irqreturn_t tps65090_charger_isr(int irq, void
*dev_id)
}
/* Clear interrupts. */
- ret = tps65090_write(charger->dev->parent, TPS65090_REG_INTR_STS, 0x00);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(charger->dev, "%s(): Error in writing reg 0x%x\n",
+ if (!charger->passive_mode) {
+ ret = tps65090_write(charger->dev->parent,
+TPS65090_REG_INTR_STS, 0x00);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(charger->dev,
+ "%s(): Error in writing reg 0x%x\n",
__func__, TPS65090_REG_INTR_STS);
+ }
}
if (charger->prev_ac_online != charger->ac_online)
@@ -209,6 +228,18 @@ static struct tps65090_platform_data *
}
+static int tps65090_charger_poll_task(void *data)
+{
+ set_freezable();
+
+ while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+ schedule_timeout_interruptible(POLL_INTERVAL);
+ try_to_freeze();
+ tps65090_charger_isr(-1, data);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int tps65090_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tps65090_charger *cdata;
@@ -255,22 +286,10 @@ static int tps65090_charger_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
}
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (irq <= 0) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unable to get charger irq = %d\n", irq);
- ret = irq;
- goto fail_unregister_supply;
- }
-
+ if (irq < 0)
+ irq = NO_IRQ;
cdata->irq = irq;
- ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
- tps65090_charger_isr, 0,
