RE: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
Sachin Kamat wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > Hi, > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> > >> Hi Kukjin, > >> > > Hi, > > > > > >> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >>> > >>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > >>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > >>> it will be done with using device tree. > >>> > >>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs > >>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes > >>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes > >>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 > >>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes > >>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd > >>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and > >>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC > >>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes > >>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes > >>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes > >>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC > >>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata > >>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes > >>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and > >>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes > >>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes > >> > >> > >> Thanks for this series. > >> > >> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series > >> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing. > >> > > Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just > > now but it should be fine with your series I think. > > > > Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch. > > Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week? > You mean whole patches in this series? OK, I will in this weekend. Note, as you know, missing patches in my tree are handled by other maintainer. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
Hi Kukjin, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> >> Hi Kukjin, >> > Hi, > > >> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> >>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, >>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, >>> it will be done with using device tree. >>> >>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs >>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes >>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes >>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 >>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes >>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd >>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and >>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC >>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes >>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes >>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes >>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC >>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata >>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes >>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and >>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes >>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes >> >> >> Thanks for this series. >> >> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series >> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing. >> > Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just > now but it should be fine with your series I think. > > Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch. Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week? Thanks. -- Regards, Sachin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote: Hi Kukjin, Hi, On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, it will be done with using device tree. [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes Thanks for this series. Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing. Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just now but it should be fine with your series I think. Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch. Thanks for your support for s5pv210 dt migration. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
Hi Kukjin, On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > it will be done with using device tree. > > [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs > [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes > [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes > [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 > [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes > [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd > [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and > [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC > [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes > [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes > [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes > [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC > [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata > [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes > [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and > [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes > [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes Thanks for this series. Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
Tushar Behera wrote: > > On 07/01/2014 03:02 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > > it will be done with using device tree. > > > > [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs > > [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes > > [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes > > [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 > > [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes > > [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd > > [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and > > [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC > > [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes > > [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes > > [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes > > [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC > > [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata > > [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes > > [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and > > [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes > > [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes > > > > One more reference to S5PC100 can be found at drivers/irqchip/Kconfig. > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > index 131f185..9f39cc6 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ config ARM_VIC > config ARM_VIC_NR > int > default 4 if ARCH_S5PV210 > - default 3 if ARCH_S5PC100 > default 2 > depends on ARM_VIC > help Tushar, thanks. BTW, it should be included in 8/17 patch. But not shown in mailing list because of big changes so I'm resending 1/17 and 8/17 now after re-creating as per Arnd's suggestion. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 30 June 2014 16:22:25 Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > > > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > > > > it will be done with using device tree. > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime > > directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What > > about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that > > there are no longer any users. How was this determined? > I asked whether we may remove its supporting in mainline before not just one time and then no objection at that time... > From what I can tell, the supported machines on these two platforms are > all the official development prototypes, not production boards, and they > came out in rather small quantities, probably Samsung-internal for the > most part. The maintainers have previously assured me they are not aware > of anybody using it, and I trust their judgment. > Yeah, I think so ;-) > I'm totally fine with removing support for these machines, and we have > removed a number of similar platforms in the past. The rule is not that S5P6442. I did commit a73ddc61 'ARM: S5P6442: Removing ARCH_S5P6442' in 2011 because that could not be mass-produced. > we never remove stuff, the rule is that we never break things for > active users. > YES. > As always, if it turns out that we missed some active users, we will > revert these patches, or bring support back another way. > Sure, so please let us know if you have any objection on this removing. > This should probably all be spelled out explicitly in the changelog > for patch 1, which I admit I have not seen. > It's my fault, sorry I forgot it and I'm resending 1/17 and 8/17 with -D. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
On 07/01/2014 03:02 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > it will be done with using device tree. > > [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs > [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes > [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes > [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 > [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes > [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd > [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and > [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC > [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes > [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes > [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes > [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC > [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata > [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes > [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and > [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes > [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes > One more reference to S5PC100 can be found at drivers/irqchip/Kconfig. diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index 131f185..9f39cc6 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ config ARM_VIC config ARM_VIC_NR int default 4 if ARCH_S5PV210 - default 3 if ARCH_S5PC100 default 2 depends on ARM_VIC help > > > ___ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Tushar Behera -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
On Monday 30 June 2014 16:22:25 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > > > it will be done with using device tree. > > > > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime > directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What > about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that > there are no longer any users. How was this determined? >From what I can tell, the supported machines on these two platforms are all the official development prototypes, not production boards, and they came out in rather small quantities, probably Samsung-internal for the most part. The maintainers have previously assured me they are not aware of anybody using it, and I trust their judgment. I'm totally fine with removing support for these machines, and we have removed a number of similar platforms in the past. The rule is not that we never remove stuff, the rule is that we never break things for active users. As always, if it turns out that we missed some active users, we will revert these patches, or bring support back another way. This should probably all be spelled out explicitly in the changelog for patch 1, which I admit I have not seen. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote: > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > > it will be done with using device tree. > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that there are no longer any users. How was this determined? Thierry pgpGeWqtfBEcw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote: > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline, > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later, > it will be done with using device tree. > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Your patch 1/17 has not made it to the mailing list, it's probably too large. Can you try recreating the patch using 'git format-patch -D'? I'd like to see the changes to arch/arm/plat-samsung. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
