RE: [PATCH V2 5/5] arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform
Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: Hello Kgene, On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: The FIMD register headers are moved to include/video/ hence, deleting these files from platform side Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h | 159 - arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h| 403 --- 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 562 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h No. This should be squashed into first patch on this series. See below. arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h| 159 .../plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 145 -- 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h (74%) If I squash it with the first patch and if somebody set that as a head commit, it will break the build. Hence, splitted it up from the first patch. NACK. your changes are not adding just moving. So should be squashed. If required, you could create just one patch for moving them, probably, 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th patches into one patch. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Thank you Sylwester for suggesting this split up change. Regards, Leela Krishna -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform
Hi, On 08/01/2012 11:39 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: The FIMD register headers are moved to include/video/ hence, deleting these files from platform side Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h | 159 - arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h| 403 --- 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 562 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h No. This should be squashed into first patch on this series. See below. arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h| 159 .../plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 145 -- 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h (74%) If I squash it with the first patch and if somebody set that as a head commit, it will break the build. Hence, splitted it up from the first patch. NACK. your changes are not adding just moving. So should be squashed. If required, you could create just one patch for moving them, probably, 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th patches into one patch. Yes, this patch series is mainly moving files around. But to avoid git bisect breakage, it should be split as it is done now, or the whole series should be squashed into one patch. The latter might be even easier to handle, but having a single patch touching arch/arm/ and drivers/ might not be a good idea. If you're fine handling that, then we just need to squash this series into single patch. It just need to be ensured, IMO, there is no bisection breakage. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH V2 5/5] arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Hi, On 08/01/2012 11:39 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: The FIMD register headers are moved to include/video/ hence, deleting these files from platform side Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h | 159 - arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h| 403 --- 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 562 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h No. This should be squashed into first patch on this series. See below. arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h| 159 .../plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 145 -- 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h (74%) If I squash it with the first patch and if somebody set that as a head commit, it will break the build. Hence, splitted it up from the first patch. NACK. your changes are not adding just moving. So should be squashed. If required, you could create just one patch for moving them, probably, 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th patches into one patch. Yes, this patch series is mainly moving files around. But to avoid git bisect breakage, it should be split as it is done now, or the whole series should be squashed into one patch. The latter might be even easier to handle, but having a single patch touching arch/arm/ and drivers/ might not be a good idea. If you're fine handling that, then we just need to squash this series into single patch. It just need to be ensured, IMO, there is no bisection breakage. I know you meant. But we don't need to keep the changes 'adding and removing' for just moving on this. I commented on 0/5 patch in this series before, if this is ready, I will create topic branch so that it could be merged into both mine and Florian's. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform
Hello Kgene, On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote: Leela Krishna Amudala wrote: The FIMD register headers are moved to include/video/ hence, deleting these files from platform side Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h | 159 - arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h| 403 --- 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 562 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h No. This should be squashed into first patch on this series. See below. arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h| 159 .../plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 145 -- 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h (74%) If I squash it with the first patch and if somebody set that as a head commit, it will break the build. Hence, splitted it up from the first patch. Thank you Sylwester for suggesting this split up change. Regards, Leela Krishna Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fbdev in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
