Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7864] New: A MTIOCTOP/MTWEOF within the early warning will cause the file number to be incorrect

2007-01-25 Thread Kai Makisara
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:07:20 -0800
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7864
> > 
> >Summary: A MTIOCTOP/MTWEOF within the early warning will cause
> > the file number to be incorrect
> > Kernel Version: 2.6.19.2
> > Status: NEW
> >   Severity: low
> >  Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  Submitter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > Write records to a SCSI tape until a write fails with a ENOSPC (you have 
> > reached
> > early warning.
> > Now perform a:
> >struct mtget before, after;
> >ioctl(fd, MTIOCGET, &before);
> >struct mtop mtop = { MTWEOF, 1 };
> >ioctl(fd, MTIOCTOP, &mtop);
> >ioctl(fd, MTIOCGET, &after);
> > 
> > Check the value of mt_fileno in the before and after structures. Notice the
> > after is 2 greater then the before.
> > 
> > The problem appears to be in the block of code starting at line 2817 in 
> > st.c.
> > This block is entered because the drive did return a CHECK CONDITION with NO
> > SENSE and the SENSE_EOM bit set. At lines 2824/5 the fileno is incremented. 
> > But
> > it has already been increased by the number of filemarks requested by the
> > MTIOCTOP. I believe that the residue count in the sense data should be
> > subtracted from fileno, not a increment as is done.
> > 
> 
> Thanks.  Could you please send us a tested patch to fix these things, as
> per http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt ?
> 
The analysis is basically correct and explains the bug. According to the 
SCSI standards, the sense code is NO SENSE or RECOVERED ERROR in case 
writing filemark(s) succeeds. If it fails (partly or completely) the sense 
code is VOLUME OVERFLOW. The patch below is tested to fix the case when 
one filemark is successfully written after the EOM early warning. It 
should also fix the case at real EOM but this has not been tested.

Carl, thanks for reporting the bug and providing the analysis for the fix.

Signed-off-by: Kai Makisara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/st.c 2006-12-09 13:29:31.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc6-km/drivers/scsi/st.c   2007-01-25 22:51:35.0 
+0200
@@ -2816,15 +2816,18 @@ static int st_int_ioctl(struct scsi_tape
 
if (cmd_in == MTWEOF &&
cmdstatp->have_sense &&
-   (cmdstatp->flags & SENSE_EOM) &&
-   (cmdstatp->sense_hdr.sense_key == NO_SENSE ||
-cmdstatp->sense_hdr.sense_key == RECOVERED_ERROR) &&
-   undone == 0) {
-   ioctl_result = 0;   /* EOF written successfully at 
EOM */
-   if (fileno >= 0)
-   fileno++;
+   (cmdstatp->flags & SENSE_EOM)) {
+   if (cmdstatp->sense_hdr.sense_key == NO_SENSE ||
+   cmdstatp->sense_hdr.sense_key == RECOVERED_ERROR) {
+   ioctl_result = 0;   /* EOF(s) written 
successfully at EOM */
+   STps->eof = ST_NOEOF;
+   } else {  /* Writing EOF(s) failed */
+   if (fileno >= 0)
+   fileno -= undone;
+   if (undone < arg)
+   STps->eof = ST_NOEOF;
+   }
STps->drv_file = fileno;
-   STps->eof = ST_NOEOF;
} else if ((cmd_in == MTFSF) || (cmd_in == MTFSFM)) {
if (fileno >= 0)
STps->drv_file = fileno - undone;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7864] New: A MTIOCTOP/MTWEOF within the early warning will cause the file number to be incorrect

2007-01-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:07:20 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7864
> 
>Summary: A MTIOCTOP/MTWEOF within the early warning will cause
> the file number to be incorrect
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19.2
> Status: NEW
>   Severity: low
>  Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Submitter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Write records to a SCSI tape until a write fails with a ENOSPC (you have 
> reached
> early warning.
> Now perform a:
>struct mtget before, after;
>ioctl(fd, MTIOCGET, &before);
>struct mtop mtop = { MTWEOF, 1 };
>ioctl(fd, MTIOCTOP, &mtop);
>ioctl(fd, MTIOCGET, &after);
> 
> Check the value of mt_fileno in the before and after structures. Notice the
> after is 2 greater then the before.
> 
> The problem appears to be in the block of code starting at line 2817 in st.c.
> This block is entered because the drive did return a CHECK CONDITION with NO
> SENSE and the SENSE_EOM bit set. At lines 2824/5 the fileno is incremented. 
> But
> it has already been increased by the number of filemarks requested by the
> MTIOCTOP. I believe that the residue count in the sense data should be
> subtracted from fileno, not a increment as is done.
> 

Thanks.  Could you please send us a tested patch to fix these things, as
per http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html