Re: [PATCH][sas] Fix potential NULL pointer dereference bug in sas_smp_get_phy_events()

2007-07-27 Thread Jesper Juhl


On 28/07/07, James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 23:27 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to
> > alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run
> > the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far
> > better to test if we got NULL back and in that case return -ENOMEM
> > just as we already do for the other memory allocation in that
> > function.
> > This patch reworks the memory allocation a bit to deal with it
> > (compile tested only).
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c |   11 +--
> >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c 
> > b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> > index b500f0c..85f5145 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> > @@ -507,14 +507,21 @@ static int sas_dev_present_in_domain(struct 
> > asd_sas_port *port,
> >  int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
> >  {
> >   int res;
> > + u8 *req;
> > + u8 *resp;
> >   struct sas_rphy *rphy = dev_to_rphy(phy->dev.parent);
> >   struct domain_device *dev = sas_find_dev_by_rphy(rphy);
> > - u8 *req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
> > - u8 *resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > + resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Actually, this should be alloc_smp_resp(RPEL_RESP_SIZE);
> 
> >   if (!resp)
> >   return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
> > + if (!req) {
> > + res = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> 
> Just for the sake of being the same as all the rest of the code, the
> sequence should be
> 
> req = alloc_smp_req(xxx_REQ_SIZE);
> if (!req)
> return -ENOMEM;
> 
> resp = alloc_smp_resp(xxx_RESP_SIZE);
> if (!resp) {
> kfree(req);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> 
> (allocate request then response).
> 
Fair enough. It makes the code a bit larger though : 

 My way, as per the original patch:
textdata bss dec hex filename
   13820   0   8   138283604 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.o
 Your way, as per this patch:
textdata bss dec hex filename
   13832   0   8   138403610 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.o

I hope this patch is acceptable : 


In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to
alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run
the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far
better to test if we got NULL back and in that case return -ENOMEM
just as we already do for the other memory allocation in that
function.
This patch should take care of it (compile tested only).


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c |   13 ++---
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c 
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index b500f0c..e98d2b9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -507,14 +507,21 @@ static int sas_dev_present_in_domain(struct asd_sas_port 
*port,
 int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
 {
int res;
+   u8 *req;
+   u8 *resp;
struct sas_rphy *rphy = dev_to_rphy(phy->dev.parent);
struct domain_device *dev = sas_find_dev_by_rphy(rphy);
-   u8 *req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
-   u8 *resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 
-   if (!resp)
+   req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
+   if (!req)
return -ENOMEM;
 
+   resp = alloc_smp_resp(RPEL_RESP_SIZE);
+   if (!resp) {
+   kfree(req);
+   return -ENOMEM;
+   }
+
req[1] = SMP_REPORT_PHY_ERR_LOG;
req[9] = phy->number;
 




> It looks like disc_resp could use a little love too (it's using the req
> alloc routines).
> 
I'll take a look at that later.


-- 
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please  http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH][sas] Fix potential NULL pointer dereference bug in sas_smp_get_phy_events()

2007-07-27 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 23:27 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to 
> alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run 
> the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far 
> better to test if we got NULL back and in that case return -ENOMEM 
> just as we already do for the other memory allocation in that 
> function.
> This patch reworks the memory allocation a bit to deal with it 
> (compile tested only).
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c |   11 +--
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> index b500f0c..85f5145 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> @@ -507,14 +507,21 @@ static int sas_dev_present_in_domain(struct 
> asd_sas_port *port,
>  int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
>  {
>   int res;
> + u8 *req;
> + u8 *resp;
>   struct sas_rphy *rphy = dev_to_rphy(phy->dev.parent);
>   struct domain_device *dev = sas_find_dev_by_rphy(rphy);
> - u8 *req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
> - u8 *resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
> + resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);

Actually, this should be alloc_smp_resp(RPEL_RESP_SIZE);

>   if (!resp)
>   return -ENOMEM;
>  
> + req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
> + if (!req) {
> + res = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }

Just for the sake of being the same as all the rest of the code, the
sequence should be

req = alloc_smp_req(xxx_REQ_SIZE);
if (!req)
return -ENOMEM;

resp = alloc_smp_resp(xxx_RESP_SIZE);
if (!resp) {
kfree(req);
return -ENOMEM;
}

(allocate request then response).

It looks like disc_resp could use a little love too (it's using the req
alloc routines).

James

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH][sas] Fix potential NULL pointer dereference bug in sas_smp_get_phy_events()

2007-07-27 Thread Jesper Juhl
Hello,

In sas_smp_get_phy_events() we never test if the call to 
alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE) succeeds or fails. That means we run 
the risk of dereferencing a NULL pointer if it does fail. Far 
better to test if we got NULL back and in that case return -ENOMEM 
just as we already do for the other memory allocation in that 
function.
This patch reworks the memory allocation a bit to deal with it 
(compile tested only).


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c |   11 +--
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c 
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index b500f0c..85f5145 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -507,14 +507,21 @@ static int sas_dev_present_in_domain(struct asd_sas_port 
*port,
 int sas_smp_get_phy_events(struct sas_phy *phy)
 {
int res;
+   u8 *req;
+   u8 *resp;
struct sas_rphy *rphy = dev_to_rphy(phy->dev.parent);
struct domain_device *dev = sas_find_dev_by_rphy(rphy);
-   u8 *req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
-   u8 *resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 
+   resp = kzalloc(RPEL_RESP_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!resp)
return -ENOMEM;
 
+   req = alloc_smp_req(RPEL_REQ_SIZE);
+   if (!req) {
+   res = -ENOMEM;
+   goto out;
+   }
+
req[1] = SMP_REPORT_PHY_ERR_LOG;
req[9] = phy->number;
 





  PS. Please keep me on Cc when replying.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html