Fixed kernel warning on spinlock usage on some distributions

Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.sm...@emulex.com>

 ---

 lpfc_scsi.c |   21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c     2012-09-26 20:19:47.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c     2012-09-26 21:11:42.521154049 -0400
@@ -3829,9 +3829,9 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba
        cmd->scsi_done(cmd);
 
        if (phba->cfg_poll & ENABLE_FCP_RING_POLLING) {
-               spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
                lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
-               spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 
                /*
                 * If there is a thread waiting for command completion
@@ -3871,9 +3871,9 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba
                }
        }
 
-       spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
        lpfc_cmd->pCmd = NULL;
-       spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 
        /*
         * If there is a thread waiting for command completion
@@ -4398,16 +4398,17 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmn
        struct lpfc_scsi_buf *lpfc_cmd;
        IOCB_t *cmd, *icmd;
        int ret = SUCCESS, status = 0;
+       unsigned long flags;
        DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(waitq);
 
        status = fc_block_scsi_eh(cmnd);
        if (status != 0 && status != SUCCESS)
                return status;
 
-       spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, flags);
        /* driver queued commands are in process of being flushed */
        if (phba->hba_flag & HBA_FCP_IOQ_FLUSH) {
-               spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
                lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_WARNING, LOG_FCP,
                        "3168 SCSI Layer abort requested I/O has been "
                        "flushed by LLD.\n");
@@ -4416,7 +4417,7 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmn
 
        lpfc_cmd = (struct lpfc_scsi_buf *)cmnd->host_scribble;
        if (!lpfc_cmd || !lpfc_cmd->pCmd) {
-               spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
                lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_WARNING, LOG_FCP,
                         "2873 SCSI Layer I/O Abort Request IO CMPL Status "
                         "x%x ID %d LUN %d\n",
@@ -4427,7 +4428,7 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmn
        iocb = &lpfc_cmd->cur_iocbq;
        /* the command is in process of being cancelled */
        if (!(iocb->iocb_flag & LPFC_IO_ON_TXCMPLQ)) {
-               spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
                lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_WARNING, LOG_FCP,
                        "3169 SCSI Layer abort requested I/O has been "
                        "cancelled by LLD.\n");
@@ -4484,7 +4485,7 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmn
        abtsiocb->iocb_cmpl = lpfc_sli_abort_fcp_cmpl;
        abtsiocb->vport = vport;
        /* no longer need the lock after this point */
-       spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 
        if (lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, LPFC_FCP_RING, abtsiocb, 0) ==
            IOCB_ERROR) {
@@ -4516,7 +4517,7 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmn
        goto out;
 
 out_unlock:
-       spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
 out:
        lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_WARNING, LOG_FCP,
                         "0749 SCSI Layer I/O Abort Request Status x%x ID %d "



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to