Re: [PATCH 17/20 v1] [SCSI] mpt3sas: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() API instead of create_singlethread_workqueue() API

2015-06-19 Thread Martin K. Petersen
> Sreekanth Reddy  writes:

> Created a thread using alloc_ordered_workqueue() API in order to
> process the works from firmware Work-queue sequentially instead of
> create_singlethread_workqueue() API.

Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen 

-- 
Martin K. Petersen  Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in


Re: [PATCH 17/20 v1] [SCSI] mpt3sas: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() API instead of create_singlethread_workqueue() API

2015-06-18 Thread Joe Lawrence
On 06/18/2015 09:06 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Joe Lawrence  
> wrote:
>> On 06/16/2015 01:37 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>>> Created a thread using alloc_ordered_workqueue() API in order to process
>>> the works from firmware Work-queue sequentially instead of
>>> create_singlethread_workqueue() API.
>>>
>>> Changes in v1:
>>> No need to check for backport compatibility in the upstream kernel.
>>> so removing the else section where driver use
>>> create_singlethread_workqueue() API if alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is
>>> not defined, This else section is not required since in the latest upstream
>>> kernel this alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is always defined.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy 
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c 
>>> b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>>> index b848458..7e5926c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>>> @@ -8085,8 +8085,8 @@ _scsih_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct 
>>> pci_device_id *id)
>>>   /* event thread */
>>>   snprintf(ioc->firmware_event_name, sizeof(ioc->firmware_event_name),
>>>   "fw_event%d", ioc->id);
>>> - ioc->firmware_event_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(
>>> - ioc->firmware_event_name);
>>> + ioc->firmware_event_thread = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
>>> + ioc->firmware_event_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
>>>   if (!ioc->firmware_event_thread) {
>>>   pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
>>>   ioc->name, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
>>>
>>
>> Hi Sreekanth,
>>
>> Is this change still needed after e09c2c2954684 workqueue: apply
>> __WQ_ORDERED to create_singlethread_workqueue() ?  (3.17+)
> 
> I won't say that it is compulsory required, but I feel it is better if
> these changes are included. since initially we thought that thread
> created by using create_singlethread_workqueue() will process the
> works sequentially but in-between  it has broken and then it is fixed
> by Tejun.  So I thought it is better to directly use the
> alloc_ordered_workqueue() as create_singlethead_workqueue() API also
> invoked the same API.

Ok, I was just wondering if maybe create_singlethread_workqueue was
fixed after this patch was initially written.  Since it's effectively
the same...

Reviewed-by: Joe Lawrence 

Regards,

-- Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 17/20 v1] [SCSI] mpt3sas: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() API instead of create_singlethread_workqueue() API

2015-06-18 Thread Sreekanth Reddy
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Joe Lawrence  wrote:
> On 06/16/2015 01:37 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>> Created a thread using alloc_ordered_workqueue() API in order to process
>> the works from firmware Work-queue sequentially instead of
>> create_singlethread_workqueue() API.
>>
>> Changes in v1:
>> No need to check for backport compatibility in the upstream kernel.
>> so removing the else section where driver use
>> create_singlethread_workqueue() API if alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is
>> not defined, This else section is not required since in the latest upstream
>> kernel this alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is always defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy 
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c 
>> b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>> index b848458..7e5926c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
>> @@ -8085,8 +8085,8 @@ _scsih_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct 
>> pci_device_id *id)
>>   /* event thread */
>>   snprintf(ioc->firmware_event_name, sizeof(ioc->firmware_event_name),
>>   "fw_event%d", ioc->id);
>> - ioc->firmware_event_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(
>> - ioc->firmware_event_name);
>> + ioc->firmware_event_thread = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
>> + ioc->firmware_event_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
>>   if (!ioc->firmware_event_thread) {
>>   pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
>>   ioc->name, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
>>
>
> Hi Sreekanth,
>
> Is this change still needed after e09c2c2954684 workqueue: apply
> __WQ_ORDERED to create_singlethread_workqueue() ?  (3.17+)

I won't say that it is compulsory required, but I feel it is better if
these changes are included. since initially we thought that thread
created by using create_singlethread_workqueue() will process the
works sequentially but in-between  it has broken and then it is fixed
by Tejun.  So I thought it is better to directly use the
alloc_ordered_workqueue() as create_singlethead_workqueue() API also
invoked the same API.

>
> In upstream, this change looks cosmetic (unless Tejun has a preference
> for one over the other), but maybe converting to alloc_ordered_workqueue
> keeps your in house version in closer sync?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Joe



-- 

Regards,
Sreekanth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 17/20 v1] [SCSI] mpt3sas: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() API instead of create_singlethread_workqueue() API

2015-06-18 Thread Joe Lawrence
On 06/16/2015 01:37 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> Created a thread using alloc_ordered_workqueue() API in order to process
> the works from firmware Work-queue sequentially instead of
> create_singlethread_workqueue() API.
> 
> Changes in v1:
> No need to check for backport compatibility in the upstream kernel.
> so removing the else section where driver use 
> create_singlethread_workqueue() API if alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is
> not defined, This else section is not required since in the latest upstream
> kernel this alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is always defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy 
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> index b848458..7e5926c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> @@ -8085,8 +8085,8 @@ _scsih_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct 
> pci_device_id *id)
>   /* event thread */
>   snprintf(ioc->firmware_event_name, sizeof(ioc->firmware_event_name),
>   "fw_event%d", ioc->id);
> - ioc->firmware_event_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(
> - ioc->firmware_event_name);
> + ioc->firmware_event_thread = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
> + ioc->firmware_event_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
>   if (!ioc->firmware_event_thread) {
>   pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
>   ioc->name, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> 

Hi Sreekanth,

Is this change still needed after e09c2c2954684 workqueue: apply
__WQ_ORDERED to create_singlethread_workqueue() ?  (3.17+)

In upstream, this change looks cosmetic (unless Tejun has a preference
for one over the other), but maybe converting to alloc_ordered_workqueue
keeps your in house version in closer sync?

Thanks,

-- Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH 17/20 v1] [SCSI] mpt3sas: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() API instead of create_singlethread_workqueue() API

2015-06-15 Thread Sreekanth Reddy
Created a thread using alloc_ordered_workqueue() API in order to process
the works from firmware Work-queue sequentially instead of
create_singlethread_workqueue() API.

Changes in v1:
No need to check for backport compatibility in the upstream kernel.
so removing the else section where driver use 
create_singlethread_workqueue() API if alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is
not defined, This else section is not required since in the latest upstream
kernel this alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is always defined.

Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy 
---
 drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c 
b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
index b848458..7e5926c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
@@ -8085,8 +8085,8 @@ _scsih_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct 
pci_device_id *id)
/* event thread */
snprintf(ioc->firmware_event_name, sizeof(ioc->firmware_event_name),
"fw_event%d", ioc->id);
-   ioc->firmware_event_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(
-   ioc->firmware_event_name);
+   ioc->firmware_event_thread = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
+   ioc->firmware_event_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
if (!ioc->firmware_event_thread) {
pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
ioc->name, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
-- 
2.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html