Re: [patch] [SCSI] atp870u: 64 bit bug in probe()

2015-07-30 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 07/29/2015 11:36 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
 On 64 bit CPUs there is a memory corruption bug on probe().  It should
 be a u32 pointer instead of an unsigned long pointer or we write past
 the end of the setupdata[] array.
 
 Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
 ---
 Someone reported in 2003 that probe has a NULL deref so maybe it's
 related to this memory corruption?
 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1118
 
 If only we had applied this patch when I originally sent it two years
 ago, then it would only be 10 years too late instead of 12!  :P
 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.com

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes ReineckezSeries  Storage
h...@suse.de   +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[patch] [SCSI] atp870u: 64 bit bug in probe()

2015-07-29 Thread Dan Carpenter
On 64 bit CPUs there is a memory corruption bug on probe().  It should
be a u32 pointer instead of an unsigned long pointer or we write past
the end of the setupdata[] array.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
---
Someone reported in 2003 that probe has a NULL deref so maybe it's
related to this memory corruption?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1118

If only we had applied this patch when I originally sent it two years
ago, then it would only be 10 years too late instead of 12!  :P

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
index 05301bc..62acabd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
@@ -2791,11 +2791,11 @@ next_fblk_885:
p-global_map[m]= 0;
for (k=0; k  4; k++) {
outw(n++,base_io + 0x3c);
-   ((unsigned long *)setupdata[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 
0x38);
+   ((u32 *)setupdata[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 0x38);
}
for (k=0; k  4; k++) {
outw(n++,base_io + 0x3c);
-   ((unsigned long *)p-sp[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 0x38);
+   ((u32 *)p-sp[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 0x38);
}
n += 8;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[patch] [SCSI] atp870u: 64 bit bug in probe()

2013-09-04 Thread Dan Carpenter
On 64 bit CPUs there is a memory corruption bug on probe().  It should
be setting 32 bits of data on both 32 and 64 bit.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
---
Static checker stuff.  I can't test this.

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
index 15a629d..3edbf30 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
@@ -2791,11 +2791,11 @@ next_fblk_885:
p-global_map[m]= 0;
for (k=0; k  4; k++) {
outw(n++,base_io + 0x3c);
-   ((unsigned long *)setupdata[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 
0x38);
+   ((u32 *)setupdata[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 0x38);
}
for (k=0; k  4; k++) {
outw(n++,base_io + 0x3c);
-   ((unsigned long *)p-sp[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 0x38);
+   ((u32 *)p-sp[m][0])[k]=inl(base_io + 0x38);
}
n += 8;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html