Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-10-18 Thread Denys Vlasenko
Hi Andrew, James,

On Monday 15 October 2007 14:53, Gabriel C wrote:
> >> Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23.
> >> I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches.
> > 
> > I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you 
> > want.
> 
> Works fine for me tested on :
> 
> 03:0e.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Adaptec AIC-7892P U160/m [9005:008f] 
> (rev 02)

I hope this is enough for these patches to be accepted.

If it is not, please let me know what do I need to do more.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-10-16 Thread Gabriel C
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 18:47, Gabriel C wrote:
>>> Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23.
>>> I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches.
>> I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you want.
> 
> I'd appreciate that.
> 
> Do you, by any chance, use aic94xx driver too (drivers/scsi/aic94xx/*)?
> After i'm done with aic7xxx, I may attack this one.

Sorry I don't have any box uses this one , but I'll ask some friends maybe 
someone has :)

> 
>> BTW while you seems to care about this driver could you have a look at :
>>
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3062 ?!?
> 
> I am a desktop Linux user, so far I don't use suspend at all. Sorry.

Ok , no problem maybe one 'day' the SCSI folks cares ( where the 'day' may be 
never ),  I dunno :(
  
> --
> vda
> 

Gabriel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-10-15 Thread Gabriel C
>> Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23.
>> I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches.
> 
> I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you want.

Works fine for me tested on :

03:0e.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Adaptec AIC-7892P U160/m [9005:008f] 
(rev 02)


Gabriel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-10-15 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Sunday 14 October 2007 18:47, Gabriel C wrote:
> > Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23.
> > I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches.
> 
> I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you want.

I'd appreciate that.

Do you, by any chance, use aic94xx driver too (drivers/scsi/aic94xx/*)?
After i'm done with aic7xxx, I may attack this one.

> BTW while you seems to care about this driver could you have a look at :
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3062 ?!?

I am a desktop Linux user, so far I don't use suspend at all. Sorry.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-10-14 Thread Gabriel C
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

> Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23.
> I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches.

I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you want.

BTW while you seems to care about this driver could you have a look at :

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3062 ?!?


Regards,

Gabriel C

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-08-31 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Friday 31 August 2007 17:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:13:59 BST, Denys Vlasenko said:
> >
> >textdata bss dec hex filename
> >  261433   500181172  312623   4c52f 
> > linux-2.6.23-rc1.org.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
> >  199654   500181172  250844   3d3dc 
> > linux-2.6.23-rc1.aic.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
> >  184014   213141172  206500   326a4 
> > linux-2.6.23-rc1.aic1.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
> >  20237828501172  206400   32640 
> > linux-2.6.23-rc1.aic2.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
> > 
> > 1-debloat.patchdeinlines a lot of functions
> > 2-addstatic.patch  adds statics, #ifdefs out huge amount of unused code, 
> > adds consts
> > 3-addconst.patch   adds more consts
> 
> Yowza.  Looking at aic1->aic2, it looks like 20K became 'const', and only
> 3K *wasn't* 'const'?  

Exactly. There are firmware images/patches and a lot of structures
with char* members pointing to text/messages.

Btw, aic94xx driver needs the same treatment.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers

2007-08-31 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:13:59 BST, Denys Vlasenko said:
>
>textdata bss dec hex filename
>  261433   500181172  312623   4c52f 
> linux-2.6.23-rc1.org.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
>  199654   500181172  250844   3d3dc 
> linux-2.6.23-rc1.aic.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
>  184014   213141172  206500   326a4 
> linux-2.6.23-rc1.aic1.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
>  20237828501172  206400   32640 
> linux-2.6.23-rc1.aic2.t/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/built-in.o
> 
> 1-debloat.patchdeinlines a lot of functions
> 2-addstatic.patch  adds statics, #ifdefs out huge amount of unused code, adds 
> consts
> 3-addconst.patch   adds more consts

Yowza.  Looking at aic1->aic2, it looks like 20K became 'const', and only
3K *wasn't* 'const'?  


pgpAnWeUyBl9V.pgp
Description: PGP signature