Re: [PATCH v3 0/13] IB SRP initiator patches for kernel 3.11

[Or Gerlitz]

On 03/07/2013 15:41, Bart Van Assche wrote:


[...]

Bart,


The individual patches in this series are as follows:
0001-IB-srp-Fix-remove_one-crash-due-to-resource-exhausti.patch
0002-IB-srp-Fix-race-between-srp_queuecommand-and-srp_cla.patch
0003-IB-srp-Avoid-that-srp_reset_host-is-skipped-after-a-.patch
0004-IB-srp-Fail-I-O-fast-if-target-offline.patch
0005-IB-srp-Skip-host-settle-delay.patch
0006-IB-srp-Maintain-a-single-connection-per-I_T-nexus.patch
0007-IB-srp-Keep-rport-as-long-as-the-IB-transport-layer.patch
0008-scsi_transport_srp-Add-transport-layer-error-handlin.patch
0009-IB-srp-Add-srp_terminate_io.patch
0010-IB-srp-Use-SRP-transport-layer-error-recovery.patch
0011-IB-srp-Start-timers-if-a-transport-layer-error-occur.patch
0012-IB-srp-Fail-SCSI-commands-silently.patch
0013-IB-srp-Make-HCA-completion-vector-configurable.patch
0014-IB-srp-Make-transport-layer-retry-count-configurable.patch
0015-IB-srp-Bump-driver-version-and-release-date.patch


Some of these patches were already picked by Roland (SB), I would 
suggest that you

post V4 and drop the ones which were accepted.

e8ca413 IB/srp: Bump driver version and release date
4b5e5f4 IB/srp: Make HCA completion vector configurable
96fc248 IB/srp: Maintain a single connection per I_T nexus
99e1c13 IB/srp: Fail I/O fast if target offline
2742c1d IB/srp: Skip host settle delay
086f44f IB/srp: Avoid skipping srp_reset_host() after a transport error
1fe0cb8 IB/srp: Fix remove_one crash due to resource exhaustion

Also, Would help if you use the --cover-letter of git format-patch and
the resulted cover letter  (patch 0/N) as it has standard content which
you can enhance and place your additions.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v3 0/13] IB SRP initiator patches for kernel 3.11

[Bart Van Assche]

On 07/03/13 15:38, Or Gerlitz wrote:

Some of these patches were already picked by Roland (SB), I would
suggest that you post V4 and drop the ones which were accepted.


One of the patches that is already in Roland's tree and that was in v1 
of this series has been split into two patches in v2 and v3 of this 
series. So I'd like to hear from Roland what he prefers himself - that I 
drop the patches that are already in his tree or that Roland updates his 
tree with the most recently posted patches.


Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html