block: remove dead code in scsi_ioctl:blk_verify_command

2014-05-29 Thread Dave Jones
filter gets assigned the address of blk_default_cmd_filter on
entry to this function, so the !filter condition can never be true.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com

diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
index 26487972ac54..9c28a5b38042 100644
--- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -205,10 +205,6 @@ int blk_verify_command(unsigned char *cmd, fmode_t 
has_write_perm)
if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
return 0;
 
-   /* if there's no filter set, assume we're filtering everything out */
-   if (!filter)
-   return -EPERM;
-
/* Anybody who can open the device can do a read-safe command */
if (test_bit(cmd[0], filter-read_ok))
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: block: remove dead code in scsi_ioctl:blk_verify_command

2014-05-29 Thread Jens Axboe
On 05/29/2014 01:11 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
 filter gets assigned the address of blk_default_cmd_filter on
 entry to this function, so the !filter condition can never be true.
 
 Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
 
 diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
 index 26487972ac54..9c28a5b38042 100644
 --- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
 +++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
 @@ -205,10 +205,6 @@ int blk_verify_command(unsigned char *cmd, fmode_t 
 has_write_perm)
   if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
   return 0;
  
 - /* if there's no filter set, assume we're filtering everything out */
 - if (!filter)
 - return -EPERM;
 -
   /* Anybody who can open the device can do a read-safe command */
   if (test_bit(cmd[0], filter-read_ok))
   return 0;

Thanks Dave, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html