[PATCH] clocksource: arc_timer: use BIT() instead of _BITUL()
This is in-kernel C code, so there is no reason to use _BITUL(). Replace it with equivalent BIT(). I added #include explicitly although it has been included by other headers eventually. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c index b28970ca4a7a..b1f21bf3b83c 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -142,7 +143,7 @@ static u64 arc_read_rtc(struct clocksource *cs) l = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_LOW); h = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_HIGH); status = read_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_CTRL); - } while (!(status & _BITUL(31))); + } while (!(status & BIT(31))); return (((u64)h) << 32) | l; } -- 2.17.1 ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
[PATCH 5.0 131/139] perf bench numa: Add define for RUSAGE_THREAD if not present
[ Upstream commit bf561d3c13423fc54daa19b5d49dc15fafdb7acc ] While cross building perf to the ARC architecture on a fedora 30 host, we were failing with: CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’: bench/numa.c:1261:12: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SIGEV_THREAD’? getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, ); ^ SIGEV_THREAD bench/numa.c:1261:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ /arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_uclibc_le_archs_linux_install/bin/arc-linux-gcc --version | head -1 arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225 [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ Trying to reproduce a report by Vineet, I noticed that, with just cross-built zlib and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define, check for that and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define in the system headers, check if it is defined in the 'perf bench numa' sources and define it if not. Now it builds and I have to figure out if the problem reported by Vineet only takes place if we have libelf or some other library available. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Vineet Gupta Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2wb4r1gir9xrevbpq7qp0...@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 44195514b19e6..fa56fde6e8d80 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ #include #include +#ifndef RUSAGE_THREAD +# define RUSAGE_THREAD 1 +#endif + /* * Regular printout to the terminal, supressed if -q is specified: */ -- 2.20.1 ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
[PATCH 4.19 106/114] perf bench numa: Add define for RUSAGE_THREAD if not present
[ Upstream commit bf561d3c13423fc54daa19b5d49dc15fafdb7acc ] While cross building perf to the ARC architecture on a fedora 30 host, we were failing with: CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’: bench/numa.c:1261:12: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SIGEV_THREAD’? getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, ); ^ SIGEV_THREAD bench/numa.c:1261:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ /arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_uclibc_le_archs_linux_install/bin/arc-linux-gcc --version | head -1 arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225 [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ Trying to reproduce a report by Vineet, I noticed that, with just cross-built zlib and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define, check for that and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define in the system headers, check if it is defined in the 'perf bench numa' sources and define it if not. Now it builds and I have to figure out if the problem reported by Vineet only takes place if we have libelf or some other library available. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Vineet Gupta Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2wb4r1gir9xrevbpq7qp0...@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 44195514b19e6..fa56fde6e8d80 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ #include #include +#ifndef RUSAGE_THREAD +# define RUSAGE_THREAD 1 +#endif + /* * Regular printout to the terminal, supressed if -q is specified: */ -- 2.20.1 ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
[PATCH 4.14 71/77] perf bench numa: Add define for RUSAGE_THREAD if not present
[ Upstream commit bf561d3c13423fc54daa19b5d49dc15fafdb7acc ] While cross building perf to the ARC architecture on a fedora 30 host, we were failing with: CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’: bench/numa.c:1261:12: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SIGEV_THREAD’? getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, ); ^ SIGEV_THREAD bench/numa.c:1261:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ /arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_uclibc_le_archs_linux_install/bin/arc-linux-gcc --version | head -1 arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225 [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ Trying to reproduce a report by Vineet, I noticed that, with just cross-built zlib and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define, check for that and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define in the system headers, check if it is defined in the 'perf bench numa' sources and define it if not. Now it builds and I have to figure out if the problem reported by Vineet only takes place if we have libelf or some other library available. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Vineet Gupta Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2wb4r1gir9xrevbpq7qp0...@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 0afcc7eccc619..997875c770b10 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ #include #include +#ifndef RUSAGE_THREAD +# define RUSAGE_THREAD 1 +#endif + /* * Regular printout to the terminal, supressed if -q is specified: */ -- 2.20.1 ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
[PATCH 4.9 50/53] perf bench numa: Add define for RUSAGE_THREAD if not present
[ Upstream commit bf561d3c13423fc54daa19b5d49dc15fafdb7acc ] While cross building perf to the ARC architecture on a fedora 30 host, we were failing with: CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’: bench/numa.c:1261:12: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SIGEV_THREAD’? getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, ); ^ SIGEV_THREAD bench/numa.c:1261:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ /arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_uclibc_le_archs_linux_install/bin/arc-linux-gcc --version | head -1 arc-linux-gcc (ARCv2 ISA Linux uClibc toolchain 2019.03-rc1) 8.3.1 20190225 [perfbuilder@60d5802468f6 perf]$ Trying to reproduce a report by Vineet, I noticed that, with just cross-built zlib and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define, check for that and numactl libraries, I ended up with the above failure. So, since RUSAGE_THREAD is available as a define in the system headers, check if it is defined in the 'perf bench numa' sources and define it if not. Now it builds and I have to figure out if the problem reported by Vineet only takes place if we have libelf or some other library available. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Vineet Gupta Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2wb4r1gir9xrevbpq7qp0...@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index ee9565a033f47..e58be7eeced83 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ #include #include +#ifndef RUSAGE_THREAD +# define RUSAGE_THREAD 1 +#endif + /* * Regular printout to the terminal, supressed if -q is specified: */ -- 2.20.1 ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH] ARC: Don't set CROSS_COMPILE in arch's Makefile
On 9/16/18 1:47 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> There's not much sense in doing that because if user or
> his build-system didn't set CROSS_COMPILE we still may
> very well make incorrect guess.
>
> But as it turned out setting CROSS_COMPILE is not as harmless
> as one may think: with recent changes that implemented automatic
> discovery of __host__ gcc features unconditional setup of
> CROSS_COMPILE leads to failures on execution of "make xxx_defconfig"
> with absent cross-compiler, for more info see [1].
>
> Set CROSS_COMPILE as well gets in the way if we want only to build
> .dtb's (again with absent cross-compiler which is not really needed
> for building .dtb's), see [2].
@Alexey, can we revisit this (revert back partially). I'm getting sick of having
to specify the CROSS_COMPILE in my cmdline.
Will something along the lines fc2b47b55f17fd996f7a019 ("h8300: use
cc-cross-prefix instead of hardcoding h8300-unknown-linux-") work ?
>
+ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
+CROSS_COMPILE := $(call cc-cross-prefix, arc-linux-)
+endif
>
> Note, we had to change LIBGCC assignment type from ":=" to "="
> so that is is resolved on its usage, otherwise if it is resolved
> at declaration time with missing CROSS_COMPILE we're getting this
> error message from host GCC:
> ->8-
> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mmedium-calls’
> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-mno-sdata’; did you mean
> ‘-fno-stats’?
> ->8-
>
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2018-September/004308.html
> [2]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2018-September/004320.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada
> Cc: Rob Herring
> ---
> arch/arc/Makefile | 10 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/Makefile b/arch/arc/Makefile
> index 99cce77ab98f..5f6b67917dc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arc/Makefile
> @@ -6,14 +6,6 @@
> # published by the Free Software Foundation.
> #
>
> -ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
> -ifndef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> -CROSS_COMPILE := arc-linux-
> -else
> -CROSS_COMPILE := arceb-linux-
> -endif
> -endif
> -
> KBUILD_DEFCONFIG := nsim_700_defconfig
>
> cflags-y += -fno-common -pipe -fno-builtin -mmedium-calls -D__linux__
> @@ -79,7 +71,7 @@ cflags-$(disable_small_data)+= -mno-sdata
> -fcall-used-gp
> cflags-$(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN) += -mbig-endian
> ldflags-$(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN) += -EB
>
> -LIBGCC := $(shell $(CC) $(cflags-y) --print-libgcc-file-name)
> +LIBGCC = $(shell $(CC) $(cflags-y) --print-libgcc-file-name)
>
> # Modules with short calls might break for calls into builtin-kernel
> KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE += -mlong-calls -mno-millicode
>
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
