Re: [PATCH] ARC: adjust memblock_reserve of kernel memory

2018-12-19 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 12/19/18 8:16 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> In setup_arch_memory we reserve the memory area wherein the kernel
> is located. Current implementation may reserve more memory than
> it actually required in case of CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE is not
> equal to CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE. This happens because we calculate
> start of the reserved region relatively to the CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE
> and end of the region relatively to the CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE.
>
> For example in case of HSDK board we wasted 256MiB of physical memory:
> --->8--
> Memory: 770416K/1048576K available (5496K kernel code,
> 240K rwdata, 1064K rodata, 2200K init, 275K bss,
> 278160K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
> --->8--
>
> Fix that.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org

For backports, please also check how far back this needs to be applied (else we
get bot emails specifying they don't apply to ver x, y z)

> Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev 
> ---
>  arch/arc/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/init.c b/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> index f8fe5668b30f..a56e6a8ed259 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/mm/init.c
> @@ -137,7 +137,8 @@ void __init setup_arch_memory(void)
>*/
>  
>   memblock_add_node(low_mem_start, low_mem_sz, 0);
> - memblock_reserve(low_mem_start, __pa(_end) - low_mem_start);
> + memblock_reserve(CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE,
> +  __pa(_end) - CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
>   if (initrd_start)

So I looked into the history for restricting stable, and it seems this was
introduced with our earlier work for HSDK.

Before commit 9ed68785f7f this code was ok, since low_mem_start =
CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE.
With the patch we changed low_mem_start to CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE and missed 
this.

-Vineet

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [PATCH] ARC: adjust memblock_reserve of kernel memory

2018-12-19 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 12/19/18 8:16 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> In setup_arch_memory we reserve the memory area wherein the kernel
> is located. Current implementation may reserve more memory than
> it actually required in case of CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE is not
> equal to CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE. This happens because we calculate
> start of the reserved region relatively to the CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE
> and end of the region relatively to the CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE.
>
> For example in case of HSDK board we wasted 256MiB of physical memory:
> --->8--
> Memory: 770416K/1048576K available (5496K kernel code,
> 240K rwdata, 1064K rodata, 2200K init, 275K bss,
> 278160K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
> --->8--
>
> Fix that.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev 

LGTM. I presume you have booted HSDK with it and done some smoke testing.

-Vineet

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [PATCH] ARC: adjust memblock_reserve of kernel memory

2018-12-19 Thread Sasha Levin
Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all

The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.10, v4.14.89, v4.9.146, v4.4.168, 
v3.18.130, 

v4.19.10: Build OK!
v4.14.89: Build OK!
v4.9.146: Build OK!
v4.4.168: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
26f9d5fd82ca ("ARC: support HIGHMEM even without PAE40")
37eda9df5bd8 ("ARC: mm: Introduce explicit super page size support")
c2ff5cf2735c ("ARC: mm: Use virt_to_pfn() for addr >> PAGE_SHIFT pattern")

v3.18.130: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
09f3b37e4e3b ("ARC: entry.S: Introduce INTERRUPT_{PROLOGUE,EPILOGUE}")
1f6ccfff6314 ("ARCv2: Support for ARCv2 ISA and HS38x cores")
26f9d5fd82ca ("ARC: support HIGHMEM even without PAE40")
37eda9df5bd8 ("ARC: mm: Introduce explicit super page size support")
4bf4564b27db ("ARC: entry.S: comments cleanup")
565a9b497c51 ("ARC: RIP broken 64bit RTSC")
5793e273a134 ("ARC: intc: split into ARCompact ISA specific, common bits")
6d1a20b1d237 ("ARC: entry.S: split into ARCompact ISA specific, common 
bits")
820970a5aa3c ("ARCv2: [intc] HS38 core interrupt controller")
9b8c7d1e7107 ("ARC: entry.S: FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN can always use r9")
a44ec8bd2a55 ("ARC: Fix RTT boot printing")
a615b47dbf0d ("ARC: entry.S: confine EXCEPTION_* macros to one file")
a8717d280879 ("ARC: entry.S: Trap handler to use r10 for syscall vs. brkpt 
decision")
c10d6969b095 ("ARC: entry.S: Ensure that restore_regs is local to 
compilation unit")
dc9e234f91c7 ("ARC: cosmetic: Remove unused ECR bitfield masks")
f033737e77d9 ("ARC: entry.S: canonical'ize EXCEPTION_{PROLOGUE,EPILOGUE}")
fbfa26ae3b20 ("ARC: entry.S: common'ize scrtach reg freeup in intr + 
exceptions")


How should we proceed with this patch?

--
Thanks,
Sasha

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc