Re: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support

2020-05-14 Thread Eugeniy Paltsev
Hi Claudiu,
ping!

Is is possible to switch between mcount modes (Linux-style <-> baremetal-style) 
via command-line options for ARC GCC?

>From: Alexey Brodkin 
>Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 17:15
>To: Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu
>Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Steven Rostedt; Ingo Molnar; 
>linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Eugeniy Paltsev; Vineet Gupta
>Subject: RE: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support
>
> Hi Claus,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-snps-arc  On Behalf 
>> Of Claudiu Zissulescu
>> Ianculescu
>> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 11:10 AM
>> To: Vineet Gupta 
>> Cc: Alexey Brodkin ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; 
>> Steven Rostedt
>> ; Ingo Molnar ; 
>> linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Eugeniy
>> Paltsev 
>> Subject: Re: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ARC-gcc has two modes to call the mcount routines. When using elf32
>> configuration, the toolchain is set to use newlib mcount. When
>> configured for linux, gcc toolchain is using a library call to _mcall
>> (single underscore)  having blink as input argument.
>> So, using the proper linux toolchain, your patch should work.
>
>
> Is there a chance to switch to Linux-style mcount in Elf32 toolchain with a 
> command-line
> option?
>
> Otherwise I guess we'll need to implement some warning which explicitly says 
> why Elf32
> toolchain is not usable for building the Linux kernel... at least in case 
> with ftrace enabled.
>
>-Alexey

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support

2020-04-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 01:17:01 +
Vineet Gupta  wrote:

> +CC Claudiu
> 
> On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:53:55 +0300
> > Eugeniy Paltsev  wrote:  
> 
> Maybe add a comment that gcc does the heavy lifting: I have following in glibc
> 
> +/* this is very simple as gcc does all the heavy lifting at _mcount call site
> + *  - sets up caller's blink in r0, so frompc is setup correctly
> + *  - preserve argument registers for original call */
> 
> >> +noinline void _mcount(unsigned long parent_ip)
> >> +{
> >> +  unsigned long ip = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
> >> +
> >> +  if (unlikely(ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub))
> >> +  ftrace_trace_function(ip - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE, parent_ip,
> >> +NULL, NULL);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_mcount);  
> > 
> > So, ARCv2 allows the _mcount code to be written in C? Nice!  
> 
> Yeah, the gcc backend for -pg was overhauled recently so it is a first class 
> "lib
> call" meaning we get all the register save/restore for free as well as caller 
> PC
> (blink) as explicit argument to _mcount
> 
> void bar(int a, int b, int c) {
>   printf("%d\n", a, b, c);
> }
> 
> bar:
>   push_s  blink
>   std.a r14,[sp,-8]
>   push_s  r13
>   mov_s   r14,r1
>   mov_s   r13,r0
>   mov_s   r0,blink
>   bl.d @_mcount
>   mov_s   r15,r2
> 
>   mov_s   r3,r15   <-- restore args for call

We really don't want this. :-/

This will make it really difficult to implement the dynamic ftrace, and
this causes more overhead when tracing is not enabled.

Also, ftrace is much more complex, and this will make it difficult to have
function graph tracing and other features.

Gcc has an "instrument-functions" which people asked me why I didn't go
that route, as it lets you do the same (call C code), and its because of
the overhead it adds to each function that I turned it down.

-- Steve



>   mov_s   r2,r14
>   mov_s   r1,r13
>   mov_s   r0,@.LC0
>   ld  blink,[sp,12]
>   pop_s   r13
>   b.d @printf
>   ldd.ab r14,[sp,12]
> 
> @Eugeniy, this patch looks ok to me, but a word of caution. This won't work 
> with
> elf32 toolchain which some of the build systems tend to use (Alexey ?)
> 
> The above _mcount semantics is only implemented for the linux tool-chains.
> elf32-gcc generates "legacy" __mcount (2 underscores, blink not provided as 
> arg)
> likely done by Claudiu to keep newlib stuff unchanged. Perhaps elf32 gcc can 
> add a
> toggle to get new _mcount.
> 
> And this is conditional to ARCv2 due to future ties into dynamic ftrace and
> instruction fudging etc ? We may have to revisit that for BE anyhow given 
> such a
> customer lining up.
> 
> -Vineet


___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


RE: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support

2020-04-02 Thread Alexey Brodkin
Hi Claus,

> -Original Message-
> From: linux-snps-arc  On Behalf 
> Of Claudiu Zissulescu
> Ianculescu
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 11:10 AM
> To: Vineet Gupta 
> Cc: Alexey Brodkin ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; 
> Steven Rostedt
> ; Ingo Molnar ; 
> linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Eugeniy
> Paltsev 
> Subject: Re: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support
> 
> Hi,
> 
> ARC-gcc has two modes to call the mcount routines. When using elf32
> configuration, the toolchain is set to use newlib mcount. When
> configured for linux, gcc toolchain is using a library call to _mcall
> (single underscore)  having blink as input argument.
> So, using the proper linux toolchain, your patch should work.


Is there a chance to switch to Linux-style mcount in Elf32 toolchain with a 
command-line
option?

Otherwise I guess we'll need to implement some warning which explicitly says 
why Elf32
toolchain is not usable for building the Linux kernel... at least in case with 
ftrace enabled.

-Alexey

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support

2020-04-02 Thread Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu
Hi,

ARC-gcc has two modes to call the mcount routines. When using elf32
configuration, the toolchain is set to use newlib mcount. When
configured for linux, gcc toolchain is using a library call to _mcall
(single underscore)  having blink as input argument.
So, using the proper linux toolchain, your patch should work.

//C

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:17 AM Vineet Gupta  wrote:
>
> +CC Claudiu
>
> On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:53:55 +0300
> > Eugeniy Paltsev  wrote:
>
> Maybe add a comment that gcc does the heavy lifting: I have following in glibc
>
> +/* this is very simple as gcc does all the heavy lifting at _mcount call site
> + *  - sets up caller's blink in r0, so frompc is setup correctly
> + *  - preserve argument registers for original call */
>
> >> +noinline void _mcount(unsigned long parent_ip)
> >> +{
> >> +unsigned long ip = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
> >> +
> >> +if (unlikely(ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub))
> >> +ftrace_trace_function(ip - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE, parent_ip,
> >> +  NULL, NULL);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_mcount);
> >
> > So, ARCv2 allows the _mcount code to be written in C? Nice!
>
> Yeah, the gcc backend for -pg was overhauled recently so it is a first class 
> "lib
> call" meaning we get all the register save/restore for free as well as caller 
> PC
> (blink) as explicit argument to _mcount
>
> void bar(int a, int b, int c) {
> printf("%d\n", a, b, c);
> }
>
> bar:
> push_s  blink
> std.a r14,[sp,-8]
> push_s  r13
> mov_s   r14,r1
> mov_s   r13,r0
> mov_s   r0,blink
> bl.d @_mcount
> mov_s   r15,r2
>
> mov_s   r3,r15   <-- restore args for call
> mov_s   r2,r14
> mov_s   r1,r13
> mov_s   r0,@.LC0
> ld  blink,[sp,12]
> pop_s   r13
> b.d @printf
> ldd.ab r14,[sp,12]
>
> @Eugeniy, this patch looks ok to me, but a word of caution. This won't work 
> with
> elf32 toolchain which some of the build systems tend to use (Alexey ?)
>
> The above _mcount semantics is only implemented for the linux tool-chains.
> elf32-gcc generates "legacy" __mcount (2 underscores, blink not provided as 
> arg)
> likely done by Claudiu to keep newlib stuff unchanged. Perhaps elf32 gcc can 
> add a
> toggle to get new _mcount.
>
> And this is conditional to ARCv2 due to future ties into dynamic ftrace and
> instruction fudging etc ? We may have to revisit that for BE anyhow given 
> such a
> customer lining up.
>
> -Vineet

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support

2020-04-01 Thread Vineet Gupta
+CC Claudiu

On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:53:55 +0300
> Eugeniy Paltsev  wrote:

Maybe add a comment that gcc does the heavy lifting: I have following in glibc

+/* this is very simple as gcc does all the heavy lifting at _mcount call site
+ *  - sets up caller's blink in r0, so frompc is setup correctly
+ *  - preserve argument registers for original call */

>> +noinline void _mcount(unsigned long parent_ip)
>> +{
>> +unsigned long ip = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
>> +
>> +if (unlikely(ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub))
>> +ftrace_trace_function(ip - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE, parent_ip,
>> +  NULL, NULL);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_mcount);
> 
> So, ARCv2 allows the _mcount code to be written in C? Nice!

Yeah, the gcc backend for -pg was overhauled recently so it is a first class 
"lib
call" meaning we get all the register save/restore for free as well as caller PC
(blink) as explicit argument to _mcount

void bar(int a, int b, int c) {
printf("%d\n", a, b, c);
}

bar:
push_s  blink
std.a r14,[sp,-8]
push_s  r13
mov_s   r14,r1
mov_s   r13,r0
mov_s   r0,blink
bl.d @_mcount
mov_s   r15,r2

mov_s   r3,r15   <-- restore args for call
mov_s   r2,r14
mov_s   r1,r13
mov_s   r0,@.LC0
ld  blink,[sp,12]
pop_s   r13
b.d @printf
ldd.ab r14,[sp,12]

@Eugeniy, this patch looks ok to me, but a word of caution. This won't work with
elf32 toolchain which some of the build systems tend to use (Alexey ?)

The above _mcount semantics is only implemented for the linux tool-chains.
elf32-gcc generates "legacy" __mcount (2 underscores, blink not provided as arg)
likely done by Claudiu to keep newlib stuff unchanged. Perhaps elf32 gcc can 
add a
toggle to get new _mcount.

And this is conditional to ARCv2 due to future ties into dynamic ftrace and
instruction fudging etc ? We may have to revisit that for BE anyhow given such a
customer lining up.

-Vineet
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [RFC] ARC: initial ftrace support

2020-03-27 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:53:55 +0300
Eugeniy Paltsev  wrote:

> +
> +noinline void _mcount(unsigned long parent_ip)
> +{
> + unsigned long ip = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
> +
> + if (unlikely(ftrace_trace_function != ftrace_stub))
> + ftrace_trace_function(ip - MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE, parent_ip,
> +   NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_mcount);

So, ARCv2 allows the _mcount code to be written in C? Nice!

-- Steve

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc