Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
On 12/20/18 4:57 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> Despite this, lockdep still barfs (see next change), but this patch >> still has merit as in we use smaller/localized buffers now and there's >> less instructoh trace to sift thru when debugging pesky issues. > But show_regs is called from contexts which might be called from deep > call chains (e.g WARN). Is it safe to allocate such a large stack there? ARC has 8K pages and 256 additional bytes of stack usage doesn't seem absurdly high to me ! -Vineet ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
On 12/20/18 5:30 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> | mmput+0x16/0xb8 > Then, does mmput_async() help? Probably, I can try. ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
On 2018/12/20 10:16, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 12/19/18 9:04 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: >> As I can see x86 use print_vma_addr() in their show_signal_msg() >> function which allocate page with __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT); > > Indeed with that the __get_free_page() lockdep splat is gone. > > There's a different one now hence my other patch. > > | [ARCLinux]# ./segv-null-ptr > | potentially unexpected fatal signal 11. > | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:1011 > | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 70, name: segv-null-ptr > | no locks held by segv-null-ptr/70. > | CPU: 0 PID: 70 Comm: segv-null-ptr Not tainted 4.18.0+ #69 > | > | Stack Trace: > | arc_unwind_core+0xcc/0x100 > | ___might_sleep+0x17a/0x190 > | mmput+0x16/0xb8 Then, does mmput_async() help? > | show_regs+0x52/0x310 > | get_signal+0x5ee/0x610 > | do_signal+0x2c/0x218 > | resume_user_mode_begin+0x90/0xd8 ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
On Tue 18-12-18 10:53:58, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Use on-stack smaller buffers instead of dynamic pages. > > The motivation for this change was to address lockdep splat when > signal handling code calls show_regs (with preemption disabled) and > ARC show_regs calls into sleepable page allocator. > > | potentially unexpected fatal signal 11. > | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > ../mm/page_alloc.c:4317 > | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 57, name: segv > | no locks held by segv/57. > | Preemption disabled at: > | [<8182f17e>] get_signal+0x4a6/0x7c4 > | CPU: 0 PID: 57 Comm: segv Not tainted 4.17.0+ #23 > | > | Stack Trace: > | arc_unwind_core.constprop.1+0xd0/0xf4 > | __might_sleep+0x1f6/0x234 > | __get_free_pages+0x174/0xca0 > | show_regs+0x22/0x330 > | get_signal+0x4ac/0x7c4 # print_fatal_signals() -> preempt_disable() > | do_signal+0x30/0x224 > | resume_user_mode_begin+0x90/0xd8 > > Despite this, lockdep still barfs (see next change), but this patch > still has merit as in we use smaller/localized buffers now and there's > less instructoh trace to sift thru when debugging pesky issues. But show_regs is called from contexts which might be called from deep call chains (e.g WARN). Is it safe to allocate such a large stack there? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
On 12/19/18 9:04 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > As I can see x86 use print_vma_addr() in their show_signal_msg() > function which allocate page with __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT); Indeed with that the __get_free_page() lockdep splat is gone. There's a different one now hence my other patch. | [ARCLinux]# ./segv-null-ptr | potentially unexpected fatal signal 11. | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:1011 | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 70, name: segv-null-ptr | no locks held by segv-null-ptr/70. | CPU: 0 PID: 70 Comm: segv-null-ptr Not tainted 4.18.0+ #69 | | Stack Trace: | arc_unwind_core+0xcc/0x100 | ___might_sleep+0x17a/0x190 | mmput+0x16/0xb8 | show_regs+0x52/0x310 | get_signal+0x5ee/0x610 | do_signal+0x2c/0x218 | resume_user_mode_begin+0x90/0xd8 ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
On 12/19/18 12:46 PM, William Kucharski wrote: > I would rather see 256 as a #define somewhere rather than a magic number > sprinkled > around arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c. That bothered me as well, but I was too lazy to define one and the existing ones don't apply. PATH_MAX is 4K which will blow up the stack usage. > > Still, that's what the existing code does, so I suppose it's OK. I'll define one locally. > Otherwise the change looks good. Thx for taking a look. > Reviewed-by: William Kucharski I'll add this to the patch. Thx, -Vineet ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
> On Dec 18, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > Use on-stack smaller buffers instead of dynamic pages. > > The motivation for this change was to address lockdep splat when > signal handling code calls show_regs (with preemption disabled) and > ARC show_regs calls into sleepable page allocator. > > | potentially unexpected fatal signal 11. > | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > ../mm/page_alloc.c:4317 > | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 57, name: segv > | no locks held by segv/57. > | Preemption disabled at: > | [<8182f17e>] get_signal+0x4a6/0x7c4 > | CPU: 0 PID: 57 Comm: segv Not tainted 4.17.0+ #23 > | > | Stack Trace: > | arc_unwind_core.constprop.1+0xd0/0xf4 > | __might_sleep+0x1f6/0x234 > | __get_free_pages+0x174/0xca0 > | show_regs+0x22/0x330 > | get_signal+0x4ac/0x7c4 # print_fatal_signals() -> preempt_disable() > | do_signal+0x30/0x224 > | resume_user_mode_begin+0x90/0xd8 > > Despite this, lockdep still barfs (see next change), but this patch > still has merit as in we use smaller/localized buffers now and there's > less instructoh trace to sift thru when debugging pesky issues. > > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta I would rather see 256 as a #define somewhere rather than a magic number sprinkled around arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c. Still, that's what the existing code does, so I suppose it's OK. Otherwise the change looks good. Reviewed-by: William Kucharski ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
On 12/19/18 9:04 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > Just curious: isn't that enough to use GFP_NOWAIT instead > of GFP_KERNEL when we allocate page in show_regs()? > > As I can see x86 use print_vma_addr() in their show_signal_msg() > function which allocate page with __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT); I'm not sure if lockdep will be happy with it still. At any rate, as explained in changelog, this still has merit, since the buffer is only needed for nested d_path calls, which are better served with a smaller on-stack buffer. For cases such as kernel crash, we want lesser code/traces in fault path to sift thru ! -Vineet ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: show_regs: avoid page allocator
Hi Vineet,
Just curious: isn't that enough to use GFP_NOWAIT instead
of GFP_KERNEL when we allocate page in show_regs()?
As I can see x86 use print_vma_addr() in their show_signal_msg()
function which allocate page with __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT);
On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 10:53 -0800, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Use on-stack smaller buffers instead of dynamic pages.
>
> The motivation for this change was to address lockdep splat when
> signal handling code calls show_regs (with preemption disabled) and
> ARC show_regs calls into sleepable page allocator.
>
> > potentially unexpected fatal signal 11.
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > ../mm/page_alloc.c:4317
> > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 57, name: segv
> > no locks held by segv/57.
> > Preemption disabled at:
> > [<8182f17e>] get_signal+0x4a6/0x7c4
> > CPU: 0 PID: 57 Comm: segv Not tainted 4.17.0+ #23
> >
> > Stack Trace:
> > arc_unwind_core.constprop.1+0xd0/0xf4
> > __might_sleep+0x1f6/0x234
> > __get_free_pages+0x174/0xca0
> > show_regs+0x22/0x330
> > get_signal+0x4ac/0x7c4 # print_fatal_signals() -> preempt_disable()
> > do_signal+0x30/0x224
> > resume_user_mode_begin+0x90/0xd8
>
> Despite this, lockdep still barfs (see next change), but this patch
> still has merit as in we use smaller/localized buffers now and there's
> less instructoh trace to sift thru when debugging pesky issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
> ---
> arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c | 22 +-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c b/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c
> index e8d9fb452346..2885bec71fb8 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c
> @@ -58,11 +58,12 @@ static void show_callee_regs(struct callee_regs *cregs)
> print_reg_file(&(cregs->r13), 13);
> }
>
> -static void print_task_path_n_nm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *buf)
> +static void print_task_path_n_nm(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> char *path_nm = NULL;
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> struct file *exe_file;
> + char buf[256];
>
> mm = get_task_mm(tsk);
> if (!mm)
> @@ -80,10 +81,9 @@ static void print_task_path_n_nm(struct task_struct *tsk,
> char *buf)
> pr_info("Path: %s\n", !IS_ERR(path_nm) ? path_nm : "?");
> }
>
> -static void show_faulting_vma(unsigned long address, char *buf)
> +static void show_faulting_vma(unsigned long address)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> - char *nm = buf;
> struct mm_struct *active_mm = current->active_mm;
>
> /* can't use print_vma_addr() yet as it doesn't check for
> @@ -96,8 +96,11 @@ static void show_faulting_vma(unsigned long address, char
> *buf)
>* if the container VMA is not found
>*/
> if (vma && (vma->vm_start <= address)) {
> + char buf[256];
> + char *nm = "?";
> +
> if (vma->vm_file) {
> - nm = file_path(vma->vm_file, buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> + nm = file_path(vma->vm_file, buf, 256-1);
> if (IS_ERR(nm))
> nm = "?";
> }
> @@ -173,13 +176,8 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> struct callee_regs *cregs;
> - char *buf;
> -
> - buf = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!buf)
> - return;
>
> - print_task_path_n_nm(tsk, buf);
> + print_task_path_n_nm(tsk);
> show_regs_print_info(KERN_INFO);
>
> show_ecr_verbose(regs);
> @@ -189,7 +187,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> (void *)regs->blink, (void *)regs->ret);
>
> if (user_mode(regs))
> - show_faulting_vma(regs->ret, buf); /* faulting code, not data */
> + show_faulting_vma(regs->ret); /* faulting code, not data */
>
> pr_info("[STAT32]: 0x%08lx", regs->status32);
>
> @@ -221,8 +219,6 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> cregs = (struct callee_regs *)current->thread.callee_reg;
> if (cregs)
> show_callee_regs(cregs);
> -
> - free_page((unsigned long)buf);
> }
>
> void show_kernel_fault_diag(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs,
--
Eugeniy Paltsev
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
