[PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: add test validating uprobe/uretprobe stack traces

2024-05-08 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
Add a set of tests to validate that stack traces captured from or in the
presence of active uprobes and uretprobes are valid and complete.

For this we use BPF program that are installed either on entry or exit
of user function, plus deep-nested USDT. One of target funtions
(target_1) is recursive to generate two different entries in the stack
trace for the same uprobe/uretprobe, testing potential edge conditions.

Without fixes in this patch set, we get something like this for one of
the scenarios:

 caller: 0x758fff - 0x7595ab
 target_1: 0x758fd5 - 0x758fff
 target_2: 0x758fca - 0x758fd5
 target_3: 0x758fbf - 0x758fca
 target_4: 0x758fb3 - 0x758fbf
 ENTRY #0: 0x758fb3 (in target_4)
 ENTRY #1: 0x758fd3 (in target_2)
 ENTRY #2: 0x758ffd (in target_1)
 ENTRY #3: 0x7fffe000
 ENTRY #4: 0x7fffe000
 ENTRY #5: 0x6f8f39
 ENTRY #6: 0x6fa6f0
 ENTRY #7: 0x7f403f229590

Entry #3 and #4 (0x7fffe000) are uretprobe trampoline addresses
which obscure actual target_1 and another target_1 invocations. Also
note that between entry #0 and entry #1 we are missing an entry for
target_3, which is fixed in patch #2.

With all the fixes, we get desired full stack traces:

 caller: 0x758fff - 0x7595ab
 target_1: 0x758fd5 - 0x758fff
 target_2: 0x758fca - 0x758fd5
 target_3: 0x758fbf - 0x758fca
 target_4: 0x758fb3 - 0x758fbf
 ENTRY #0: 0x758fb7 (in target_4)
 ENTRY #1: 0x758fc8 (in target_3)
 ENTRY #2: 0x758fd3 (in target_2)
 ENTRY #3: 0x758ffd (in target_1)
 ENTRY #4: 0x758ff3 (in target_1)
 ENTRY #5: 0x75922c (in caller)
 ENTRY #6: 0x6f8f39
 ENTRY #7: 0x6fa6f0
 ENTRY #8: 0x7f986adc4cd0

Now there is a logical and complete sequence of function calls.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/uretprobe_stack.c  | 185 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/uretprobe_stack.c |  96 +
 2 files changed, 281 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uretprobe_stack.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uretprobe_stack.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uretprobe_stack.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uretprobe_stack.c
new file mode 100644
index ..2974553da6e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uretprobe_stack.c
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include 
+#include "uretprobe_stack.skel.h"
+#include "../sdt.h"
+
+/* We set up target_1() -> target_2() -> target_3() -> target_4() -> USDT()
+ * call chain, each being traced by our BPF program. On entry or return from
+ * each target_*() we are capturing user stack trace and recording it in
+ * global variable, so that user space part of the test can validate it.
+ *
+ * Note, we put each target function into a custom section to get those
+ * __start_XXX/__stop_XXX symbols, generated by linker for us, which allow us
+ * to know address range of those functions
+ */
+__attribute__((section("uprobe__target_4")))
+__weak int target_4(void)
+{
+   STAP_PROBE1(uretprobe_stack, target, 42);
+   return 42;
+}
+
+extern const void *__start_uprobe__target_4;
+extern const void *__stop_uprobe__target_4;
+
+__attribute__((section("uprobe__target_3")))
+__weak int target_3(void)
+{
+   return target_4();
+}
+
+extern const void *__start_uprobe__target_3;
+extern const void *__stop_uprobe__target_3;
+
+__attribute__((section("uprobe__target_2")))
+__weak int target_2(void)
+{
+   return target_3();
+}
+
+extern const void *__start_uprobe__target_2;
+extern const void *__stop_uprobe__target_2;
+
+__attribute__((section("uprobe__target_1")))
+__weak int target_1(int depth)
+{
+   if (depth < 1)
+   return 1 + target_1(depth + 1);
+   else
+   return target_2();
+}
+
+extern const void *__start_uprobe__target_1;
+extern const void *__stop_uprobe__target_1;
+
+extern const void *__start_uretprobe_stack_sec;
+extern const void *__stop_uretprobe_stack_sec;
+
+struct range {
+   long start;
+   long stop;
+};
+
+static struct range targets[] = {
+   {}, /* we want target_1 to map to target[1], so need 1-based indexing */
+   { (long)&__start_uprobe__target_1, (long)&__stop_uprobe__target_1 },
+   { (long)&__start_uprobe__target_2, (long)&__stop_uprobe__target_2 },
+   { (long)&__start_uprobe__target_3, (long)&__stop_uprobe__target_3 },
+   { (long)&__start_uprobe__target_4, (long)&__stop_uprobe__target_4 },
+};
+
+static struct range caller = {
+   (long)&__start_uretprobe_stack_sec,
+   (long)&__stop_uretprobe_stack_sec,
+};
+
+static void validate_stack(__u64 *ips, int stack_len, int cnt, ...)
+{
+   int i, j;
+   va_list args;
+
+   if (!ASSERT_GT(stack_len, 0, "stack_len"))
+   return;
+
+   stack_len /= 8;
+
+   /* check if we have enough entries to satisfy test expectations */
+   if (!ASSERT_GE(stack_len, cnt, "stack_len2"))
+

[PATCH 3/4] perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe

2024-05-08 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
When tracing user functions with uprobe functionality, it's common to
install the probe (e.g., a BPF program) at the first instruction of the
function. This is often going to be `push %rbp` instruction in function
preamble, which means that within that function frame pointer hasn't
been established yet. This leads to consistently missing an actual
caller of the traced function, because perf_callchain_user() only
records current IP (capturing traced function) and then following frame
pointer chain (which would be caller's frame, containing the address of
caller's caller).

So when we have target_1 -> target_2 -> target_3 call chain and we are
tracing an entry to target_3, captured stack trace will report
target_1 -> target_3 call chain, which is wrong and confusing.

This patch proposes a x86-64-specific heuristic to detect `push %rbp`
instruction being traced. If that's the case, with the assumption that
applicatoin is compiled with frame pointers, this instruction would be
a strong indicator that this is the entry to the function. In that case,
return address is still pointed to by %rsp, so we fetch it and add to
stack trace before proceeding to unwind the rest using frame
pointer-based logic.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c  | 20 
 include/linux/uprobes.h |  2 ++
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 5b0dd07b1ef1..82d5570b58ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2884,6 +2884,26 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx 
*entry, struct pt_regs *regs
return;
 
pagefault_disable();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
+   /*
+* If we are called from uprobe handler, and we are indeed at the very
+* entry to user function (which is normally a `push %rbp` instruction,
+* under assumption of application being compiled with frame pointers),
+* we should read return address from *regs->sp before proceeding
+* to follow frame pointers, otherwise we'll skip immediate caller
+* as %rbp is not yet setup.
+*/
+   if (current->utask) {
+   struct arch_uprobe *auprobe = current->utask->auprobe;
+   u64 ret_addr;
+
+   if (auprobe && auprobe->insn[0] == 0x55 /* push %rbp */ &&
+   !__get_user(ret_addr, (const u64 __user *)regs->sp))
+   perf_callchain_store(entry, ret_addr);
+   }
+#endif
+
while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
if (!valid_user_frame(fp, sizeof(frame)))
break;
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 0c57eec85339..7b785cd30d86 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ struct uprobe_task {
struct uprobe   *active_uprobe;
unsigned long   xol_vaddr;
 
+   struct arch_uprobe  *auprobe;
+
struct return_instance  *return_instances;
unsigned intdepth;
 };
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 1c99380dc89d..504693845187 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -2072,6 +2072,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct 
pt_regs *regs)
bool need_prep = false; /* prepare return uprobe, when needed */
 
down_read(>register_rwsem);
+   current->utask->auprobe = >arch;
for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
int rc = 0;
 
@@ -2086,6 +2087,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct 
pt_regs *regs)
 
remove &= rc;
}
+   current->utask->auprobe = NULL;
 
if (need_prep && !remove)
prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs); /* put bp at return */
-- 
2.43.0




[PATCH 2/4] perf,uprobes: fix user stack traces in the presence of pending uretprobes

2024-05-08 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
When kernel has pending uretprobes installed, it hijacks original user
function return address on the stack with a uretprobe trampoline
address. There could be multiple such pending uretprobes (either on
different user functions or on the same recursive one) at any given
time within the same task.

This approach interferes with the user stack trace capture logic, which
would report suprising addresses (like 0x7fffe000) that correspond
to a special "[uprobes]" section that kernel installs in the target
process address space for uretprobe trampoline code, while logically it
should be an address somewhere within the calling function of another
traced user function.

This is easy to correct for, though. Uprobes subsystem keeps track of
pending uretprobes and records original return addresses. This patch is
using this to do a post-processing step and restore each trampoline
address entries with correct original return address. This is done only
if there are pending uretprobes for current task.

Reported-by: Riham Selim 
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
---
 kernel/events/callchain.c | 42 ++-
 kernel/events/uprobes.c   |  9 +
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
index 1273be84392c..2f7ceca7ae3f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
+++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 
 #include "internal.h"
 
@@ -176,13 +177,50 @@ put_callchain_entry(int rctx)
put_recursion_context(this_cpu_ptr(callchain_recursion), rctx);
 }
 
+static void fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(struct perf_callchain_entry 
*entry,
+  int start_entry_idx)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
+   struct uprobe_task *utask = current->utask;
+   struct return_instance *ri;
+   __u64 *cur_ip, *last_ip, tramp_addr;
+
+   if (likely(!utask || !utask->return_instances))
+   return;
+
+   cur_ip = >ip[start_entry_idx];
+   last_ip = >ip[entry->nr - 1];
+   ri = utask->return_instances;
+   tramp_addr = uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr();
+
+   /* If there are pending uretprobes for current thread, they are
+* recorded in a list inside utask->return_instances; each such
+* pending uretprobe replaces traced user function's return address on
+* the stack, so when stack trace is captured, instead of seeing
+* actual function's return address, we'll have one or many uretprobe
+* trampoline addresses in the stack trace, which are not helpful and
+* misleading to users.
+* So here we go over the pending list of uretprobes, and each
+* encountered trampoline address is replaced with actual return
+* address.
+*/
+   while (ri && cur_ip <= last_ip) {
+   if (*cur_ip == tramp_addr) {
+   *cur_ip = ri->orig_ret_vaddr;
+   ri = ri->next;
+   }
+   cur_ip++;
+   }
+#endif
+}
+
 struct perf_callchain_entry *
 get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool kernel, bool user,
   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
 {
struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
-   int rctx;
+   int rctx, start_entry_idx;
 
entry = get_callchain_entry();
if (!entry)
@@ -215,7 +253,9 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 init_nr, bool 
kernel, bool user,
if (add_mark)
perf_callchain_store_context(, 
PERF_CONTEXT_USER);
 
+   start_entry_idx = entry->nr;
perf_callchain_user(, regs);
+   fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(entry, 
start_entry_idx);
}
}
 
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index d60d24f0f2f4..1c99380dc89d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -2149,6 +2149,15 @@ static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
instruction_pointer_set(regs, ri->orig_ret_vaddr);
do {
+   /* pop current instance from the stack of pending 
return instances,
+* as it's not pending anymore: we just fixed up 
original
+* instruction pointer in regs and are about to call 
handlers;
+* this allows fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries() to 
properly fix up
+* captured stack traces from uretprobe handlers, in 
which pending
+* trampoline addresses on the stack are replaced with 
correct
+* original return addresses
+*/
+   utask->return_instances = ri->next;
if (valid)

[PATCH 1/4] uprobes: rename get_trampoline_vaddr() and make it global

2024-05-08 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
This helper is needed in another file, so make it a bit more uniquely
named and expose it internally.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko 
---
 include/linux/uprobes.h | 1 +
 kernel/events/uprobes.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index f46e0ca0169c..0c57eec85339 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance 
*ret, enum rp_check c
 extern bool arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
 void *src, unsigned long len);
+extern unsigned long uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr(void);
 #else /* !CONFIG_UPROBES */
 struct uprobes_state {
 };
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 8ae0eefc3a34..d60d24f0f2f4 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ void uprobe_copy_process(struct task_struct *t, unsigned 
long flags)
  *
  * Returns -1 in case the xol_area is not allocated.
  */
-static unsigned long get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
+unsigned long uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
 {
struct xol_area *area;
unsigned long trampoline_vaddr = -1;
@@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, 
struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!ri)
return;
 
-   trampoline_vaddr = get_trampoline_vaddr();
+   trampoline_vaddr = uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr();
orig_ret_vaddr = arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(trampoline_vaddr, 
regs);
if (orig_ret_vaddr == -1)
goto fail;
@@ -2187,7 +2187,7 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
int is_swbp;
 
bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs);
-   if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr())
+   if (bp_vaddr == uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr())
return handle_trampoline(regs);
 
uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, _swbp);
-- 
2.43.0




[PATCH 0/4] Fix user stack traces captured from uprobes

2024-05-08 Thread Andrii Nakryiko
This patch set reports two issues with captured stack traces.

First issue, fixed in patch #2, deals with fixing up uretprobe trampoline
addresses in captured stack trace. This issue happens when there are pending
return probes, for which kernel hijacks some of the return addresses on user
stacks. The code is matching those special uretprobe trampoline addresses with
the list of pending return probe instances and replaces them with actual
return addresses.

Second issue, which patch #3 is trying to fix with the help of heuristic, is
having to do with capturing user stack traces in entry uprobes. At the very
entrance to user function, frame pointer in rbp register is not yet setup, so
actual caller return address is still pointed to by rsp. Patch is using
a simple heuristic, looking for `push %rbp` instruction, to fetch this extra
direct caller return address, before proceeding to unwind the stack using rbp.

Consider this patch #3 an RFC, if there are better suggestions how this can be
solved, I'd be happy to hear that.

Patch #4 adds tests into BPF selftests, that validate that captured stack
traces at various points is what we expect to get. This patch, while being BPF
selftests, is isolated from any other BPF selftests changes and can go in
through non-BPF tree without the risk of merge conflicts.

Patches are based on latest linux-trace's probes/for-next branch.

Andrii Nakryiko (4):
  uprobes: rename get_trampoline_vaddr() and make it global
  perf,uprobes: fix user stack traces in the presence of pending
uretprobes
  perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in
uprobe
  selftests/bpf: add test validating uprobe/uretprobe stack traces

 arch/x86/events/core.c|  20 ++
 include/linux/uprobes.h   |   3 +
 kernel/events/callchain.c |  42 +++-
 kernel/events/uprobes.c   |  17 +-
 .../bpf/prog_tests/uretprobe_stack.c  | 185 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/uretprobe_stack.c |  96 +
 6 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uretprobe_stack.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/uretprobe_stack.c

-- 
2.43.0