Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] trace: platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add SBAF trace support

2024-06-27 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan


On 6/27/24 6:56 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 02:35:16 +
> Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan  wrote:
>
>> From: Jithu Joseph 
>>
>> Add tracing support for the SBAF IFS tests, which may be useful for
>> debugging systems that fail these tests. Log details like test content
>> batch number, SBAF bundle ID, program index and the exact errors or
>> warnings encountered by each HT thread during the test.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj 
>> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck 
>> Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph 
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
>> 
>> ---
>>  include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h | 27 
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h 
>> b/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
>> index 0d88ebf2c980..9c7413de432b 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
>> @@ -35,6 +35,33 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ifs_status,
>>  __entry->status)
>>  );
>>  
>> +TRACE_EVENT(ifs_sbaf,
>> +
>> +TP_PROTO(int batch, union ifs_sbaf activate, union ifs_sbaf_status 
>> status),
>> +
>> +TP_ARGS(batch, activate, status),
>> +
>> +TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> +__field(int,batch   )
>> +__field(u64,status  )
> Please put the 64 bit status field before the 32 bit batch field,
> otherwise this will likely create a 4 byte hole between the two fields.
> Space on the ring buffer is expensive real-estate.

Agree. I will fix this in next version.

>
> -- Steve
>
>> +__field(u16,bundle  )
>> +__field(u16,pgm )
>> +),
>> +
>> +TP_fast_assign(
>> +__entry->batch  = batch;
>> +__entry->bundle = activate.bundle_idx;
>> +__entry->pgm= activate.pgm_idx;
>> +__entry->status = status.data;
>> +),
>> +
>> +TP_printk("batch: 0x%.2x, bundle_idx: 0x%.4x, pgm_idx: 0x%.4x, status: 
>> 0x%.16llx",
>> +__entry->batch,
>> +__entry->bundle,
>> +__entry->pgm,
>> +__entry->status)
>> +);
>> +
>>  #endif /* _TRACE_IFS_H */
>>  
>>  /* This part must be outside protection */
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c 
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
>> index bdb31b2f45b4..69ee0eb72025 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
>> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static int dosbaf(void *data)
>>   */
>>  wrmsrl(MSR_ACTIVATE_SBAF, run_params->activate->data);
>>  rdmsrl(MSR_SBAF_STATUS, status.data);
>> +trace_ifs_sbaf(ifsd->cur_batch, *run_params->activate, status);
>>  
>>  /* Pass back the result of the test */
>>  if (cpu == first)

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer




Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] trace: platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add SBAF trace support

2024-06-27 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 02:35:16 +
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan  wrote:

> From: Jithu Joseph 
> 
> Add tracing support for the SBAF IFS tests, which may be useful for
> debugging systems that fail these tests. Log details like test content
> batch number, SBAF bundle ID, program index and the exact errors or
> warnings encountered by each HT thread during the test.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj 
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck 
> Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph 
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
> 
> ---
>  include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h | 27 
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h 
> b/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
> index 0d88ebf2c980..9c7413de432b 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,33 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ifs_status,
>   __entry->status)
>  );
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(ifs_sbaf,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(int batch, union ifs_sbaf activate, union ifs_sbaf_status 
> status),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(batch, activate, status),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(int,batch   )
> + __field(u64,status  )

Please put the 64 bit status field before the 32 bit batch field,
otherwise this will likely create a 4 byte hole between the two fields.
Space on the ring buffer is expensive real-estate.

-- Steve

> + __field(u16,bundle  )
> + __field(u16,pgm )
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->batch  = batch;
> + __entry->bundle = activate.bundle_idx;
> + __entry->pgm= activate.pgm_idx;
> + __entry->status = status.data;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("batch: 0x%.2x, bundle_idx: 0x%.4x, pgm_idx: 0x%.4x, status: 
> 0x%.16llx",
> + __entry->batch,
> + __entry->bundle,
> + __entry->pgm,
> + __entry->status)
> +);
> +
>  #endif /* _TRACE_IFS_H */
>  
>  /* This part must be outside protection */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c 
> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
> index bdb31b2f45b4..69ee0eb72025 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static int dosbaf(void *data)
>*/
>   wrmsrl(MSR_ACTIVATE_SBAF, run_params->activate->data);
>   rdmsrl(MSR_SBAF_STATUS, status.data);
> + trace_ifs_sbaf(ifsd->cur_batch, *run_params->activate, status);
>  
>   /* Pass back the result of the test */
>   if (cpu == first)




[PATCH v1 4/4] trace: platform/x86/intel/ifs: Add SBAF trace support

2024-06-26 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
From: Jithu Joseph 

Add tracing support for the SBAF IFS tests, which may be useful for
debugging systems that fail these tests. Log details like test content
batch number, SBAF bundle ID, program index and the exact errors or
warnings encountered by each HT thread during the test.

Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj 
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck 
Signed-off-by: Jithu Joseph 
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 

---
 include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h | 27 
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c |  1 +
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h b/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
index 0d88ebf2c980..9c7413de432b 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/intel_ifs.h
@@ -35,6 +35,33 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ifs_status,
__entry->status)
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(ifs_sbaf,
+
+   TP_PROTO(int batch, union ifs_sbaf activate, union ifs_sbaf_status 
status),
+
+   TP_ARGS(batch, activate, status),
+
+   TP_STRUCT__entry(
+   __field(int,batch   )
+   __field(u64,status  )
+   __field(u16,bundle  )
+   __field(u16,pgm )
+   ),
+
+   TP_fast_assign(
+   __entry->batch  = batch;
+   __entry->bundle = activate.bundle_idx;
+   __entry->pgm= activate.pgm_idx;
+   __entry->status = status.data;
+   ),
+
+   TP_printk("batch: 0x%.2x, bundle_idx: 0x%.4x, pgm_idx: 0x%.4x, status: 
0x%.16llx",
+   __entry->batch,
+   __entry->bundle,
+   __entry->pgm,
+   __entry->status)
+);
+
 #endif /* _TRACE_IFS_H */
 
 /* This part must be outside protection */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c 
b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
index bdb31b2f45b4..69ee0eb72025 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/runtest.c
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static int dosbaf(void *data)
 */
wrmsrl(MSR_ACTIVATE_SBAF, run_params->activate->data);
rdmsrl(MSR_SBAF_STATUS, status.data);
+   trace_ifs_sbaf(ifsd->cur_batch, *run_params->activate, status);
 
/* Pass back the result of the test */
if (cpu == first)
-- 
2.25.1