Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: composite: fill bcdUSB as 0x0320 for SuperSpeed or higher speeds
Hi, Chunfeng Yun writes: > On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 14:33 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Chunfeng Yun writes: >> > The USB3CV version 2.1.80 (March 26, 2018) requires all devices >> > ( gen1, gen2, single lane, dual lane) to return the value of 0x0320 >> > in the bcdUSB field >> >> this sounds really odd. What happens when I get a USB 3.1 compliant >> device off-the-shelf and run it through USB3CV? will it fail now? > Yes, it will fail, the last version requires it 0x0310 >> >> Care to share a screenshot or the raw html of the test result? > A screenshot is attached really odd. But I'll apply the patch. thanks -- balbi signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: composite: fill bcdUSB as 0x0320 for SuperSpeed or higher speeds
Hi, On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 14:33 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > Chunfeng Yun writes: > > The USB3CV version 2.1.80 (March 26, 2018) requires all devices > > ( gen1, gen2, single lane, dual lane) to return the value of 0x0320 > > in the bcdUSB field > > this sounds really odd. What happens when I get a USB 3.1 compliant > device off-the-shelf and run it through USB3CV? will it fail now? It will fail, the last version require it 0x0310 > > Care to share a screenshot or the raw html of the test result? A screenshot is attached >
Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: composite: fill bcdUSB as 0x0320 for SuperSpeed or higher speeds
Hi, Chunfeng Yun writes: > The USB3CV version 2.1.80 (March 26, 2018) requires all devices > ( gen1, gen2, single lane, dual lane) to return the value of 0x0320 > in the bcdUSB field this sounds really odd. What happens when I get a USB 3.1 compliant device off-the-shelf and run it through USB3CV? will it fail now? Care to share a screenshot or the raw html of the test result? -- balbi signature.asc Description: PGP signature
