Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: at91: using USBA_NR_DMAS for DMA channels
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:59:25AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: When the SoC is earlier than sama5d3 SoC, which have the same number endpoints and DMAs. However for sama5d3 SoC, it has different number for endpoints and DMAs. So, define USBA_NR_DMAs for DMA channels Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@atmel.com --- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c index 7e67a81..5cded1c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_udc_irq(int irq, void *devid) if (dma_status) { int i; - for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS; i++) + for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_DMAS; i++) if (dma_status (1 i)) usba_dma_irq(udc, udc-usba_ep[i]); } diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h index 2922db5..a70706e 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ #define USBA_FIFO_BASE(x)((x) 16) /* Synth parameters */ -#define USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS7 +#define USBA_NR_DMAS 7 what's the difference ? You just renamed this macro. Also, please clarify a bit your commit log. -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: at91: using USBA_NR_DMAS for DMA channels
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:14:58AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: Hi Felipe Balbi, On 02/19/2014 12:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:59:25AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: When the SoC is earlier than sama5d3 SoC, which have the same number endpoints and DMAs. However for sama5d3 SoC, it has different number for endpoints and DMAs. So, define USBA_NR_DMAs for DMA channels Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@atmel.com --- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c index 7e67a81..5cded1c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_udc_irq(int irq, void *devid) if (dma_status) { int i; - for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS; i++) + for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_DMAS; i++) if (dma_status (1 i)) usba_dma_irq(udc, udc-usba_ep[i]); } diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h index 2922db5..a70706e 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ #define USBA_FIFO_BASE(x) ((x) 16) /* Synth parameters */ -#define USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS 7 +#define USBA_NR_DMAS 7 what's the difference ? You just renamed this macro. Also, please clarify a bit your commit log. As commit message said, the SoC before sama5d3, the endpoint number is the same as DMA channel number, so use endpoints definition for DMA channel number, however after sama5d3, the endpoints is not the same as DMA channel, so use DMA micro for DMA channels. which means you're just renaming the macro for the sake of clarity. That's fine, just needs to be clearer in commit message. -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: at91: using USBA_NR_DMAS for DMA channels
On 02/19/2014 09:22 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:14:58AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: Hi Felipe Balbi, On 02/19/2014 12:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:59:25AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: When the SoC is earlier than sama5d3 SoC, which have the same number endpoints and DMAs. However for sama5d3 SoC, it has different number for endpoints and DMAs. So, define USBA_NR_DMAs for DMA channels Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@atmel.com --- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c index 7e67a81..5cded1c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_udc_irq(int irq, void *devid) if (dma_status) { int i; - for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS; i++) + for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_DMAS; i++) if (dma_status (1 i)) usba_dma_irq(udc, udc-usba_ep[i]); } diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h index 2922db5..a70706e 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ #define USBA_FIFO_BASE(x) ((x) 16) /* Synth parameters */ -#define USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS 7 +#define USBA_NR_DMAS 7 what's the difference ? You just renamed this macro. Also, please clarify a bit your commit log. As commit message said, the SoC before sama5d3, the endpoint number is the same as DMA channel number, so use endpoints definition for DMA channel number, however after sama5d3, the endpoints is not the same as DMA channel, so use DMA micro for DMA channels. which means you're just renaming the macro for the sake of clarity. That's fine, just needs to be clearer in commit message. Thanks, I will send v2 to make the commit message more clearer. Best Regards, Bo Shen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-usb in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: at91: using USBA_NR_DMAS for DMA channels
On 17/01/2014 03:59, Bo Shen : When the SoC is earlier than sama5d3 SoC, which have the same number endpoints and DMAs. However for sama5d3 SoC, it has different number for endpoints and DMAs. So, define USBA_NR_DMAs for DMA channels Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@atmel.com Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com --- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c index 7e67a81..5cded1c 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_udc_irq(int irq, void *devid) if (dma_status) { int i; - for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS; i++) + for (i = 1; i USBA_NR_DMAS; i++) if (dma_status (1 i)) usba_dma_irq(udc, udc-usba_ep[i]); } diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h index 2922db5..a70706e 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ #define USBA_FIFO_BASE(x)((x) 16) /* Synth parameters */ -#define USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS7 +#define USBA_NR_DMAS 7 #define EP0_FIFO_SIZE64 #define EP0_EPT_SIZE USBA_EPT_SIZE_64 -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-usb in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html