Re: [PATCH 31/39] USB: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro

2013-12-09 Thread 'Greg Kroah-Hartman'
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:03:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:27:58AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
  Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro
  is not preferred.
  
  Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com
 
 I wonder why I wasn't Cc:ed to this email considering it touches three
 drivers I care about.
 
 Greg, I have the original ones in my tree and I would really like to
 avoid rebasing my 'next' branch. Do we keep it there or do you want to
 avoid merging those commits ?

Just keep it there and we can handle the merge, it shouldn't be a big
deal, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-usb in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 31/39] USB: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro

2013-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:33:17AM -0800, 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:03:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
  On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:27:58AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
   Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro
   is not preferred.
   
   Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com
  
  I wonder why I wasn't Cc:ed to this email considering it touches three
  drivers I care about.
  
  Greg, I have the original ones in my tree and I would really like to
  avoid rebasing my 'next' branch. Do we keep it there or do you want to
  avoid merging those commits ?
 
 Just keep it there and we can handle the merge, it shouldn't be a big
 deal, right?

Should not. Thanks Greg.

-- 
balbi


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [PATCH 31/39] USB: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro

2013-12-08 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:27:58AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
 Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro
 is not preferred.
 
 Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com

I wonder why I wasn't Cc:ed to this email considering it touches three
drivers I care about.

Greg, I have the original ones in my tree and I would really like to
avoid rebasing my 'next' branch. Do we keep it there or do you want to
avoid merging those commits ?

Jingoo, please keep maintainers in Cc next time, it's very tough to
filter emails you care about otherwise.

cheers

-- 
balbi


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature