Re: [PATCH v10 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core

2016-06-13 Thread Peter Chen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:37:59AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 13/06/16 10:20, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:14:31AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> On 12/06/16 14:36, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>   
>  +/**
>  + * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver 
>  list
>  + * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
>  + * driver's device.
> >>>
> >>> It seems it should be udc device
> >>
> >> Parent and udc->dev are not the same right?
> > 
> > Sure, udc's parent is otg device.
> > 
> >>
> >> I guess i'll omit the second statement to avoid confusion. So.
> >>
> >> @parent: the parent device to this udc.
> > 
> > Where you call below APIs? It seems to be a udc driver, right?
> > So, when you try to get "otg-controller" from the node, this node
> > should be udc.
> 
> @parent is actually the device that represents the USB Device controller
> in the device tree. When you call usb_add_gadget_udc_release() a new
> udc->dev device is created as it's child.
> 
> See explanation for the @parent argument in usb_add_gadget_udc_release().
> As we want to keep the parent argument identical to that I will not make
> any changes then.

Oh, yes. The parent should be glue layer udc device or the dual-role controller
device.

Peter
> 
> > 
> > /**
> >  * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver list
> >  * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
> >  * driver's device.
> >  * @gadget: the gadget to be added to the list
> >  * @otg_dev: the OTG controller device
> >  *
> >  * If otg_dev is NULL then device tree node is checked
> >  * for OTG controller via the otg-controller property.
> >  * Returns zero on success, negative errno otherwise.
> >  */
> > int usb_otg_add_gadget_udc(struct device *parent, struct usb_gadget *gadget,
> >struct device *otg_dev)
> > {
> > if (!otg_dev) {
> > gadget->otg_dev = of_usb_get_otg(parent->of_node);
> > if (!gadget->otg_dev)
> > return -ENODEV;
> > } else {
> > gadget->otg_dev = otg_dev;
> > }
> > 
> > return usb_add_gadget_udc_release(parent, gadget, NULL);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_otg_add_gadget_udc);
> > 
> 
> --
> cheers,
> -roger

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v10 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core

2016-06-13 Thread Roger Quadros
On 13/06/16 10:20, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:14:31AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 12/06/16 14:36, Peter Chen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
  
 +/**
 + * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver list
 + * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
 + * driver's device.
>>>
>>> It seems it should be udc device
>>
>> Parent and udc->dev are not the same right?
> 
> Sure, udc's parent is otg device.
> 
>>
>> I guess i'll omit the second statement to avoid confusion. So.
>>
>> @parent: the parent device to this udc.
> 
> Where you call below APIs? It seems to be a udc driver, right?
> So, when you try to get "otg-controller" from the node, this node
> should be udc.

@parent is actually the device that represents the USB Device controller
in the device tree. When you call usb_add_gadget_udc_release() a new
udc->dev device is created as it's child.

See explanation for the @parent argument in usb_add_gadget_udc_release().
As we want to keep the parent argument identical to that I will not make
any changes then.

> 
> /**
>  * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver list
>  * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
>  * driver's device.
>  * @gadget: the gadget to be added to the list
>  * @otg_dev: the OTG controller device
>  *
>  * If otg_dev is NULL then device tree node is checked
>  * for OTG controller via the otg-controller property.
>  * Returns zero on success, negative errno otherwise.
>  */
> int usb_otg_add_gadget_udc(struct device *parent, struct usb_gadget *gadget,
>  struct device *otg_dev)
> {
>   if (!otg_dev) {
>   gadget->otg_dev = of_usb_get_otg(parent->of_node);
>   if (!gadget->otg_dev)
>   return -ENODEV;
>   } else {
>   gadget->otg_dev = otg_dev;
>   }
> 
>   return usb_add_gadget_udc_release(parent, gadget, NULL);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_otg_add_gadget_udc);
> 

--
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v10 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core

2016-06-13 Thread Peter Chen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:14:31AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 12/06/16 14:36, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>  
> >> +/**
> >> + * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver list
> >> + * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
> >> + * driver's device.
> > 
> > It seems it should be udc device
> 
> Parent and udc->dev are not the same right?

Sure, udc's parent is otg device.

> 
> I guess i'll omit the second statement to avoid confusion. So.
> 
> @parent: the parent device to this udc.

Where you call below APIs? It seems to be a udc driver, right?
So, when you try to get "otg-controller" from the node, this node
should be udc.

/**
 * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver list
 * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
 * driver's device.
 * @gadget: the gadget to be added to the list
 * @otg_dev: the OTG controller device
 *
 * If otg_dev is NULL then device tree node is checked
 * for OTG controller via the otg-controller property.
 * Returns zero on success, negative errno otherwise.
 */
int usb_otg_add_gadget_udc(struct device *parent, struct usb_gadget *gadget,
   struct device *otg_dev)
{
if (!otg_dev) {
gadget->otg_dev = of_usb_get_otg(parent->of_node);
if (!gadget->otg_dev)
return -ENODEV;
} else {
gadget->otg_dev = otg_dev;
}

return usb_add_gadget_udc_release(parent, gadget, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_otg_add_gadget_udc);
-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v10 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core

2016-06-13 Thread Roger Quadros
On 12/06/16 14:36, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver list
>> + * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
>> + * driver's device.
> 
> It seems it should be udc device

Parent and udc->dev are not the same right?

I guess i'll omit the second statement to avoid confusion. So.

@parent: the parent device to this udc.

> 
>> +/* udc_lock must be held */
>>  static int udc_bind_to_driver(struct usb_udc *udc, struct usb_gadget_driver 
>> *driver)
>>  {
>>  int ret;
>> @@ -1282,17 +1449,26 @@ static int udc_bind_to_driver(struct usb_udc *udc, 
>> struct usb_gadget_driver *dri
>>  ret = driver->bind(udc->gadget, driver);
>>  if (ret)
>>  goto err1;
>> -ret = usb_gadget_udc_start(udc);
>> -if (ret) {
>> -driver->unbind(udc->gadget);
>> -goto err1;
>> +
>> +/* If OTG/dual-role, the otg core manages UDC start/stop */
>> +if (udc->gadget->otg_dev) {
>> +mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
>> +usb_otg_gadget_ready(udc->gadget, true);
>> +mutex_lock(&udc_lock);
>> +} else {
>> +ret = usb_gadget_udc_start(udc);
>> +if (ret) {
>> +mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
>> +driver->unbind(udc->gadget);
>> +goto err1;
>> +}
>> +usb_udc_connect_control(udc);
>>  }
>> -usb_udc_connect_control(udc);
>>  
>>  kobject_uevent(&udc->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
>>  return 0;
>>  err1:
>> -if (ret != -EISNAM)
>> +if ((ret != -EISNAM) && (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER))
> 
> It seems it will not introduce -EPROBE_DEFER with your changes
> in udc_bind_to_driver
> 

Good catch. Left over bit when I moved defer probing out of here.

--
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v10 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core

2016-06-12 Thread Peter Chen
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:07:22PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>  
> +/**
> + * usb_otg_add_gadget_udc - adds a new gadget to the udc class driver list
> + * @parent: the parent device to this udc. Usually the controller
> + * driver's device.

It seems it should be udc device

> +/* udc_lock must be held */
>  static int udc_bind_to_driver(struct usb_udc *udc, struct usb_gadget_driver 
> *driver)
>  {
>   int ret;
> @@ -1282,17 +1449,26 @@ static int udc_bind_to_driver(struct usb_udc *udc, 
> struct usb_gadget_driver *dri
>   ret = driver->bind(udc->gadget, driver);
>   if (ret)
>   goto err1;
> - ret = usb_gadget_udc_start(udc);
> - if (ret) {
> - driver->unbind(udc->gadget);
> - goto err1;
> +
> + /* If OTG/dual-role, the otg core manages UDC start/stop */
> + if (udc->gadget->otg_dev) {
> + mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
> + usb_otg_gadget_ready(udc->gadget, true);
> + mutex_lock(&udc_lock);
> + } else {
> + ret = usb_gadget_udc_start(udc);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&udc_lock);
> + driver->unbind(udc->gadget);
> + goto err1;
> + }
> + usb_udc_connect_control(udc);
>   }
> - usb_udc_connect_control(udc);
>  
>   kobject_uevent(&udc->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
>   return 0;
>  err1:
> - if (ret != -EISNAM)
> + if ((ret != -EISNAM) && (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER))

It seems it will not introduce -EPROBE_DEFER with your changes
in udc_bind_to_driver

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html