RE: query on [PATCH 2/3] usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library

2012-09-25 Thread Mohammed, Afzal 
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 16:21:39, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde  
> wrote:

> > I'm interested in to get these patches into the kernel soon. Kishon any
> > news on this patch?
> >
> >> Something like this would be required for USB support
> >> on beagle bone (AM335X), which has 2 phy's of same type.
> >>
> >> Or is the plan to use generic phy framework instead ?
> >
> > Yes, Kishon's patches look more generic than mine.
> Will post the next version by this week.

Thanks Marc and Kishon

Regards
Afzal

Re: query on [PATCH 2/3] usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library

2012-09-25 Thread ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY 
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde  wrote:
> Hi Afzal,
>
> On 09/25/2012 10:47 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>> This is a query regarding patch,
>> "usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library" [1]
>>
>> It seems there is so far no consensus on this change.
>
> After I have posted this patch, Kishon had posted a better solution [2].
> We discussed the patch, but he has not posted any updates since then.
>
>> Do you have ideas to proceed on this ? is there something
>> that I can help you to proceed on this ?
>
> I'm interested in to get these patches into the kernel soon. Kishon any
> news on this patch?
>
>> Something like this would be required for USB support
>> on beagle bone (AM335X), which has 2 phy's of same type.
>>
>> Or is the plan to use generic phy framework instead ?
>
> Yes, Kishon's patches look more generic than mine.
Will post the next version by this week.

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: query on [PATCH 2/3] usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library

2012-09-25 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde 
Hi Afzal,

On 09/25/2012 10:47 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> This is a query regarding patch,
> "usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library" [1]
> 
> It seems there is so far no consensus on this change.

After I have posted this patch, Kishon had posted a better solution [2].
We discussed the patch, but he has not posted any updates since then.

> Do you have ideas to proceed on this ? is there something
> that I can help you to proceed on this ?

I'm interested in to get these patches into the kernel soon. Kishon any
news on this patch?

> Something like this would be required for USB support
> on beagle bone (AM335X), which has 2 phy's of same type.
> 
> Or is the plan to use generic phy framework instead ?

Yes, Kishon's patches look more generic than mine.

Marc

[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1457801/
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.  | Marc Kleine-Budde   |
Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund  | Fax:   +49-5121-206917- |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

query on [PATCH 2/3] usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library

2012-09-25 Thread Mohammed, Afzal 
Hi Marc,

This is a query regarding patch,
"usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library" [1]

It seems there is so far no consensus on this change.

Do you have ideas to proceed on this ? is there something
that I can help you to proceed on this ?

Something like this would be required for USB support
on beagle bone (AM335X), which has 2 phy's of same type.

Or is the plan to use generic phy framework instead ?

Regards
Afzal

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=134574263632422&w=2

N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+{��^n�r���z���h�&���G���h�(�階�ݢj"���m��z�ޖ���f���h���~�m�