[linux-usb-devel] Undeliverable: Re: That movie

2003-09-07 Thread System Administrator 
Your message

  To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: That movie
  Sent:Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:46:34 +0300

did not reach the following recipient(s):

[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:41:25 +0300
The recipient name is not recognized
The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=daewoo
automobil;l=NEPTUN0309071041RCS914CR
MSEXCH:IMS:DWAR:neptun:NEPTUN 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient


--- Begin Message ---
Please see the attached file for details.



Deleted Attachment.txt
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---

[linux-usb-devel] BANNED FILENAME (wicked_scr.scr) IN YOUR MAIL

2003-09-07 Thread amavisd-new 
BANNED FILENAME ALERT

Our virus checker found
banned filename: wicked_scr.scr
in your email to the following recipient:
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Delivery of the email was stopped!

Please check your system for viruses,
or ask your system administrator to do so.

For your reference, here are headers from your email:
- BEGIN HEADERS -
Received: from HPPAV (12-211-191-72.client.attbi.com [12.211.191.72])
by wawawa.emse.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8EB7C9A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  7 Sep 2003 20:52:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: That movie
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:52:54 --0500
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_NextPart_000_0187B597"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- END HEADERS --
Reporting-MTA: dns; wawawa
Received-From-MTA: smtp; wawawa.emse.fr ([127.0.0.1])
Arrival-Date: Sun,  7 Sep 2003 20:53:07 +0200 (CEST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Message content rejected, id=07100-05 - BANNED: wicked_scr.scr
Last-Attempt-Date: Sun,  7 Sep 2003 20:53:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from HPPAV (12-211-191-72.client.attbi.com [12.211.191.72])
	by wawawa.emse.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8EB7C9A
	for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  7 Sep 2003 20:52:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: That movie
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:52:54 --0500
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="_NextPart_000_0187B597"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[linux-usb-devel] an ehci-q.c fix that should be in 2.4 too

2003-09-07 Thread Vedran Rodic 
Hi.

This patch went into 2.6 kernel but not in 2.4. It applies to
2.4.23-pre3 cleanly.

This sounds like it should fix my last remaining 
"usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout" problems. David?

Vedran--- Begin Message ---
ChangeSet 1.1595.7.18, 2003/07/30 13:33:37-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] USB: ehci-hcd, TT fixup

I noticed that some cases where USB produced lots of TT messages
were clearly wrong, since the transactions completed cleanly
(with a stall) and the TT buffer cleanup is only supposed to
be needed when a CSPLIT transaction fails (for control or bulk).

This patch makes the TT buffer cleanup happen only in the rarer
cases where there was an error that might really need it.


 drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c |   18 ++
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)


diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c Fri Aug  1 10:54:55 2003
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c Fri Aug  1 10:54:55 2003
@@ -161,16 +161,18 @@
usb_endpoint_halt (urb->dev,
usb_pipeendpoint (pipe),
usb_pipeout (pipe));
-   if (urb->dev->tt && !usb_pipeint (pipe)) {
+
+   /* if async CSPLIT failed, try cleaning out the TT buffer */
+   } else if (urb->dev->tt && !usb_pipeint (urb->pipe)
+   && QTD_CERR(token) == 0) {
 #ifdef DEBUG
-   struct usb_device *tt = urb->dev->tt->hub;
-   dbg ("clear tt %s-%s p%d buffer, a%d ep%d",
-   tt->bus->bus_name, tt->devpath,
-   urb->dev->ttport, urb->dev->devnum,
-   usb_pipeendpoint (pipe));
+   struct usb_device *tt = urb->dev->tt->hub;
+   dev_dbg (&tt->dev,
+   "clear tt buffer port %d, a%d ep%d t%08x\n",
+   urb->dev->ttport, urb->dev->devnum,
+   usb_pipeendpoint (urb->pipe), token);
 #endif /* DEBUG */
-   usb_hub_tt_clear_buffer (urb->dev, pipe);
-   }
+   usb_hub_tt_clear_buffer (urb->dev, urb->pipe);
}
}
 }



---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
--- End Message ---

[linux-usb-devel] PATCH 2.4: Pad UFI commands to 12 bytes with zeros

2003-09-07 Thread Matthew Dharm 
This patch from Alan Stern zero-pads commands using the UFI protocol.  This
patch exists in 2.5, but never made it into 2.4

Not all devices require this padding, but some do.

Greg, please apply.

Matt

- Forwarded message from Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:24:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PATCH: (as93) (2.4.23) Pad UFI commands to 12 bytes with zeros
To: Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: USB Storage List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=UNIFIED_PATCH,RCVD_IN_ORBZ version=2.11

Matt:

This seems never to have made it into 2.4.  I don't know if it really 
matters for anything, but it can't hurt.

Alan Stern


--- 2.4.23/drivers/usb/storage/protocol.c.orig  Mon Aug 25 07:44:42 2003
+++ 2.4.23/drivers/usb/storage/protocol.c   Fri Sep  5 16:20:26 2003
@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@
 * a unsigned char cmnd[12], so we know we have storage available
 */
 
+   /* Pad the ATAPI command with zeros */
+   for (; srb->cmd_len<12; srb->cmd_len++)
+   srb->cmnd[srb->cmd_len] = 0;
+
/* set command length to 12 bytes (this affects the transport layer) */
srb->cmd_len = 12;
 

- End forwarded message -

-- 
Matthew Dharm  Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

G:  Let me guess, you started on the 'net with AOL, right?
C:  WOW! d00d! U r leet!
-- Greg and Customer 
User Friendly, 2/12/1999


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[linux-usb-devel] Undeliverable Mail

2003-09-07 Thread Postmaster 
No message body: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No message body: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Original message follows.



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: USB modem no longer detected in -test4

2003-09-07 Thread Mike Fedyk 
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:44:18AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 05:02:00PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > 
> > So many other things don't work automatically for me in 2.6 that one
> > little echo for cdc_acm is a little thing.  Besides, hotplug doesn't
> > work either - something about the arguments to /sbin/hotplug has
> > changed since 2.4 and I am in no rush to install a new version.
> 
> Sorry, but if you want hotplug to work in 2.6, you will have to install
> a new version due to some changes to the network arguments, and due to a
> bug in the older versions of the scripts.

What release date should the hotplug scripts be?  I still have that hotplug
related oops that I told you about a while ago...


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

[linux-usb-devel] VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL ()

2003-09-07 Thread virusalert 
   V I R U S  A L E R T

Our virus checker found the



virus in your email to the following recipient:

-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Delivery of the email was stopped!

Please check your system for viruses,
or ask your system administrator to do so.

For your reference, here are headers from your email:
- BEGIN HEADERS -
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from TEST (unknown [61.51.249.64])
by hera.fh-ooe.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32FA1C10F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  8 Sep 2003 08:24:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: My details
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:25:00 +0800
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_NextPart_000_012EBAF0"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- END HEADERS --


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel