Personal firewall

2001-09-03 Thread Glenn Williams

Hi, Group:

I am running SuSE 7.2 Pro on an Intell P3 @ 450MHz w/ 128M memory.  
My DSL ethernet card is an Intel eePro 10/100.  DSL is working just 
dandy, thank you very much.

I set up the Personal Firewall a while ago and now I'm wondering how I 
can tell if it's working.  I edited the appropriate file a la the 
configuration manual, to enable it.  It is non-configurable; it's 
either on or off.  A look at /var/log/boot.msg yielded the following 
line:

    Starting personal-firewall  (initial)   [active]done

However, the word "active" is grayed or dimmed.

Anyone see anything similar in their lash-up?

TIA

Regards,

Glenn
-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-03 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Monday 03 September 2001 11:06 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Hi, Group:
>
> I am running SuSE 7.2 Pro on an Intell P3 @ 450MHz w/ 128M memory.
> My DSL ethernet card is an Intel eePro 10/100.  DSL is working just
> dandy, thank you very much.
>
> I set up the Personal Firewall a while ago and now I'm wondering how I
> can tell if it's working.  I edited the appropriate file a la the
> configuration manual, to enable it.  It is non-configurable; it's
> either on or off.  A look at /var/log/boot.msg yielded the following
> line:
>
>   Starting personal-firewall  (initial)   [active]done
>
> However, the word "active" is grayed or dimmed.
>
> Anyone see anything similar in their lash-up?
>
> TIA
>

go to:  www.vulnerabilities.org and request an nmap  scan.

I would not use the nessus scan until you find out more.  It will flood you 
with information.

> Regards,
>
> Glenn

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/03/01 23:32  +
++
"It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-03 Thread Joel Hammer

> I set up the Personal Firewall a while ago and now I'm wondering how I 
> can tell if it's working.  I edited the appropriate file a la the 
> configuration manual, to enable it.  It is non-configurable; it's 
> either on or off.  A look at /var/log/boot.msg yielded the following 

Is this ipchains? If so, there are ways to look at it to tell if it is
working.
ipchains -L -vn | less for example. Do it in an xterm with font set to
medium.
Joel


___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

Hi, Bruce:

Thanks for the info.  I went to 'vulnerabilities' web site and 
initiated a scan of my ISP, not knowing what else to use for a host 
address to be scanned.  It returned the following result:

==
66.55.21.94
From: Unprivileged user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA7 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
Skipping host   (66.55.21.94) due to host timeout
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 75 seconds
Nmap scan provided by www.vulnerabilities.org
==

As you can see, the host server timed out during the scan.  I'm not 
sure what would be a better host address to use.  Mayube I should try 
SuSE's web site.

Below are the results of  scanning SuSE's site

==
Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA7 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
Skipping host   (66.55.21.94) due to host timeout
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 75 seconds
Nmap scan provided by www.vulnerabilities.org
==

I'm not smart enough to evaluate the results.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,

Glenn

On Monday 03 September 2001 21:33, you wrote:
> On Monday 03 September 2001 11:06 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Hi, Group:
> >
> > I am running SuSE 7.2 Pro on an Intell P3 @ 450MHz w/ 128M memory.
> > My DSL ethernet card is an Intel eePro 10/100.  DSL is working just
> > dandy, thank you very much.
> >
> > I set up the Personal Firewall a while ago and now I'm wondering
> > how I can tell if it's working.  I edited the appropriate file a la
> > the configuration manual, to enable it.  It is non-configurable;
> > it's either on or off.  A look at /var/log/boot.msg yielded the
> > following line:
> >
> > Starting personal-firewall  (initial)   [active]done
> >
> > However, the word "active" is grayed or dimmed.
> >
> > Anyone see anything similar in their lash-up?
> >
> > TIA
>
> go to:  www.vulnerabilities.org and request an nmap  scan.
>
> I would not use the nessus scan until you find out more.  It will
> flood you with information.
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Glenn

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

Hi, Joel:

I followed your suggestion, and the results are meaningless to me; the 
output gave a list of sources and destinations, and the IP addresses 
were all 0.0.0.0s.  Port 53 figured prominently in the output also, if 
that has any significance.

I am nearly 8 years away from my amateur packet radio experience with 
TCP/IP and I have forgotten what little I knew.

I am grateful for your reply.

Regards,

Glenn

On Monday 03 September 2001 22:45, you wrote:
> > I set up the Personal Firewall a while ago and now I'm wondering
> > how I can tell if it's working.  I edited the appropriate file a la
> > the configuration manual, to enable it.  It is non-configurable;
> > it's either on or off.  A look at /var/log/boot.msg yielded the
> > following
>
> Is this ipchains? If so, there are ways to look at it to tell if it
> is working.
> ipchains -L -vn | less for example. Do it in an xterm with font set
> to medium.
> Joel
>
>
> ___
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Monday 03 September 2001 07:38 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Hi, Bruce:
>
> Thanks for the info.  I went to 'vulnerabilities' web site and
> initiated a scan of my ISP, not knowing what else to use for a host
> address to be scanned.  It returned the following result:

You would want to put in your own IP number as determined by the use of the  
ifconfig command.

However, my scan too timed out.   Don't know what their problem is.

Next choice would be to get someone else to run the scan for you.I'd be 
glad to do it if we can coordinate.   You'd have to send me your IP address 
via email   and I'd run the scan.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 08:31  +
++
Roger's Law:
   "As soon as the stewardesss serves the coffee, the airliner
  encounters turbulence.  Davis's explanation:  Serving coffee
  on an airliner causes turbulence."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

Hi, Bruce:

I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so I dunno 
how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use the current 
dynamic address for that purpose?

Regards,

Glenn

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 06:34, you wrote:
> On Monday 03 September 2001 07:38 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Hi, Bruce:
> >
> > Thanks for the info.  I went to 'vulnerabilities' web site and
> > initiated a scan of my ISP, not knowing what else to use for a host
> > address to be scanned.  It returned the following result:
>
> You would want to put in your own IP number as determined by the use
> of the ifconfig command.
>
> However, my scan too timed out.   Don't know what their problem is.
>
> Next choice would be to get someone else to run the scan for you.   
> I'd be glad to do it if we can coordinate.   You'd have to send me
> your IP address via email   and I'd run the scan.

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



RE: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Wil McGilvery

You can use your current IP address for the purpose of being scanned.

Regards,
 
Wil McGilvery
Manager, Digital Media

 
Lynch Technologies Inc.
416-744-7191
1-888-622-3729
416-744-0406  FAX
www.lynchdigital.com
 
 
 

 
 
 

-Original Message-
From: Glenn Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Personal firewall

Hi, Bruce:

I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so I dunno 
how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use the current 
dynamic address for that purpose?

Regards,

Glenn

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 06:34, you wrote:
> On Monday 03 September 2001 07:38 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Hi, Bruce:
> >
> > Thanks for the info.  I went to 'vulnerabilities' web site and
> > initiated a scan of my ISP, not knowing what else to use for a host
> > address to be scanned.  It returned the following result:
>
> You would want to put in your own IP number as determined by the use
> of the ifconfig command.
>
> However, my scan too timed out.   Don't know what their problem is.
>
> Next choice would be to get someone else to run the scan for you.   
> I'd be glad to do it if we can coordinate.   You'd have to send me
> your IP address via email   and I'd run the scan.

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Hi, Bruce:
>
> I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so I dunno
> how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use the current
> dynamic address for that purpose?

Yes...  you would:

1) Connect up and stay connected.

2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.

3) Send me email with same.

4) I run the scan.



++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 11:56  +
++
"Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so many memories..."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

Hi, Wil:

Thanks for the info.

Regards,

Glenn

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 08:48, you wrote:
> You can use your current IP address for the purpose of being scanned.
>
> Regards,
>
> Wil McGilvery
> Manager, Digital Media
>
>
> Lynch Technologies Inc.
> 416-744-7191
> 1-888-622-3729
> 416-744-0406  FAX
> www.lynchdigital.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Personal firewall
>
> Hi, Bruce:
>
> I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so I
> dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use the
> current dynamic address for that purpose?
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 06:34, you wrote:
> > On Monday 03 September 2001 07:38 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > Hi, Bruce:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info.  I went to 'vulnerabilities' web site and
> > > initiated a scan of my ISP, not knowing what else to use for a
> > > host address to be scanned.  It returned the following result:
> >
> > You would want to put in your own IP number as determined by the
> > use of the ifconfig command.
> >
> > However, my scan too timed out.   Don't know what their problem is.
> >
> > Next choice would be to get someone else to run the scan for you.
> > I'd be glad to do it if we can coordinate.   You'd have to send me
> > your IP address via email   and I'd run the scan.

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

Hi, Bruce:

Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of 
'ifconfig' (long form):



eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5

  inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  ^^^
  inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
  inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
  RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9 Kb)
  Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000

Thanks.

Regards, 

Glenn



On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
> On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Hi, Bruce:
> >
> > I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so I
> > dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use the
> > current dynamic address for that purpose?
>
> Yes...  you would:
>
> 1) Connect up and stay connected.
>
> 2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.
>
> 3) Send me email with same.
>
> 4) I run the scan.
>
>
>
> +
>+ + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI
> 09/04/01 11:56  +
> +
>+ "Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so many
> memories..." ___
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:42 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Hi, Bruce:
>
> Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of
> 'ifconfig' (long form):
>

Well yes,   but don't you dial up on the phone??   I would need the ppp0  
part of the ifconfig  output.   The  10.0.0.2  address must be your local LAN 
address.



>
>
> eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5
>
>   inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>   ^^^
>   inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
>   inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
>   UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>   RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>   TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>   RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9 Kb)
>   Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
> > On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > Hi, Bruce:
> > >
> > > I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so I
> > > dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use the
> > > current dynamic address for that purpose?
> >
> > Yes...  you would:
> >
> > 1) Connect up and stay connected.
> >
> > 2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.
> >
> > 3) Send me email with same.
> >
> > 4) I run the scan.
> >
> >
> >
> > +
> >+ + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI
> > 09/04/01 11:56  +
> > +
> >+ "Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so many
> > memories..." ___
> > http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> > ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 14:02  +
++
"There's no traffic jam on the extra mile."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

Bruce:

Sorry - I guess I neglected to mention - as of last Thursday I am on 
DSL - hot all the time.  No dial-up or dial-on-demand.

Anything else I should furnish?

Regards,

Glenn


On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:42 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Hi, Bruce:
> >
> > Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of
> > 'ifconfig' (long form):
>
> Well yes,   but don't you dial up on the phone??   I would need the
> ppp0 part of the ifconfig  output.   The  10.0.0.2  address must be
> your local LAN address.
>
> > eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5
> >
> >   inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> >   ^^^
> >   inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> >   inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> >   UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >   RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >   TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> >   RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9 Kb)
> >   Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Glenn
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
> > > On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > > Hi, Bruce:
> > > >
> > > > I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so
> > > > I dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use
> > > > the current dynamic address for that purpose?
> > >
> > > Yes...  you would:
> > >
> > > 1) Connect up and stay connected.
> > >
> > > 2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.
> > >
> > > 3) Send me email with same.
> > >
> > > 4) I run the scan.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +
> > > + + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire,
> > > MI 09/04/01 11:56  +
> > > +
> > > + "Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so
> > > many memories..." ___
> > > http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> > > ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 02:58 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Bruce:
>
> Sorry - I guess I neglected to mention - as of last Thursday I am on
> DSL - hot all the time.  No dial-up or dial-on-demand.
>

Well, I think then that the ISP has you on a local network.  I am pretty sure 
that 10.0.0.x is one of those 'non-routable' addresses and therefore your box 
can't be accessed.

Maybe someone else can give us a clue.



> Anything else I should furnish?
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:42 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > Hi, Bruce:
> > >
> > > Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of
> > > 'ifconfig' (long form):
> >
> > Well yes,   but don't you dial up on the phone??   I would need the
> > ppp0 part of the ifconfig  output.   The  10.0.0.2  address must be
> > your local LAN address.
> >
> > > eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5
> > >
> > >   inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> > >   ^^^
> > >   inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> > >   inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> > >   UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> > >   RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > >   TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > >   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> > >   RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9 Kb)
> > >   Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Glenn
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
> > > > On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > > > Hi, Bruce:
> > > > >
> > > > > I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so
> > > > > I dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use
> > > > > the current dynamic address for that purpose?
> > > >
> > > > Yes...  you would:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Connect up and stay connected.
> > > >
> > > > 2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.
> > > >
> > > > 3) Send me email with same.
> > > >
> > > > 4) I run the scan.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +
> > > > + + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire,
> > > > MI 09/04/01 11:56  +
> > > > +
> > > > + "Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so
> > > > many memories..." ___
> > > > http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> > > > ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 15:06  +
++
"I'm just working here till a good fast-food job opens up."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Tim Wunder

The IP you gave for eth0 is definately an internal network address, not 
accessible from the outside world. Did your DSL provider give/sell you a 
router? Many DSL routers are capable of providing DHCP services for an internal 
network.

You could always go to GRC.com, https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2, and do a 
"Sheilds-Up" scan. It's not the most thorough scan in the world, but it'll tell 
you your external IP address, at the least.

HTH,
Tim

Glenn Williams wrote:

> Bruce:
> 
> Sorry - I guess I neglected to mention - as of last Thursday I am on 
> DSL - hot all the time.  No dial-up or dial-on-demand.
> 
> Anything else I should furnish?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Glenn
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> 
>>On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:42 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
>>
>>>Hi, Bruce:
>>>
>>>Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of
>>>'ifconfig' (long form):
>>>
>>Well yes,   but don't you dial up on the phone??   I would need the
>>ppp0 part of the ifconfig  output.   The  10.0.0.2  address must be
>>your local LAN address.
>>
>>
>>>eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5
>>>
>>>  inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>>  ^^^
>>>  inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
>>>  inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
>>>  UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>>  RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>  TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>  collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>>>  RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9 Kb)
>>>  Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Glenn
>>>
>>>On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
>>>
On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:

>Hi, Bruce:
>
>I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so
>I dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use
>the current dynamic address for that purpose?
>
Yes...  you would:

1) Connect up and stay connected.

2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.

3) Send me email with same.

4) I run the scan.



+
 + + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire,
MI 09/04/01 11:56  +
+
 + "Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so
many memories..." ___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

> 



___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 03:25 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
> The IP you gave for eth0 is definately an internal network address, not
> accessible from the outside world. Did your DSL provider give/sell you a
> router? Many DSL routers are capable of providing DHCP services for an
> internal network.
>
> You could always go to GRC.com, https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2, and do a
> "Sheilds-Up" scan. It's not the most thorough scan in the world, but it'll
> tell you your external IP address, at the least.
>
> HTH,
> Tim
>
> Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Bruce:
> >
> > Sorry - I guess I neglected to mention - as of last Thursday I am on
> > DSL - hot all the time.  No dial-up or dial-on-demand.
> >
> > Anything else I should furnish?

Hey Glenn:

I assume you have only one nic card in your machine

What is the output of your 'route' command?

The problem is to find out what your IP address is on the far side of 
whatever box you have connected to eth0

You might also try:traceroute and see whether we can 
determine anything from that.


> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Glenn
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> >>On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:42 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> >>>Hi, Bruce:
> >>>
> >>>Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of
> >>>'ifconfig' (long form):
> >>
> >>Well yes,   but don't you dial up on the phone??   I would need the
> >>ppp0 part of the ifconfig  output.   The  10.0.0.2  address must be
> >>your local LAN address.
> >>
> >>>eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5
> >>>
> >>>  inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> >>>  ^^^
> >>>  inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> >>>  inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> >>>  UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >>>  RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >>>  TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >>>  collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> >>>  RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9 Kb)
> >>>  Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000
> >>>
> >>>Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>
> >>>Glenn
> >>>
> >>>On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
> On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> >Hi, Bruce:
> >
> >I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so
> >I dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use
> >the current dynamic address for that purpose?
> 
> Yes...  you would:
> 
> 1) Connect up and stay connected.
> 
> 2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.
> 
> 3) Send me email with same.
> 
> 4) I run the scan.
> 
> 
> 
> +
>  + + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire,
> MI 09/04/01 11:56  +
> +
>  + "Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so
> many memories..." ___
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
>
> ___
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 15:30  +
++
"How can you tell when a programmer is lying?  His lawyer's lips move."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

Bruce and Tim:

Thanks for your help and comments.  More info follows, below:

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 13:32, you wrote:

[snip]

> Hey Glenn:
>
> I assume you have only one nic card in your machine
>
> What is the output of your 'route' command?
>
> The problem is to find out what your IP address is on the far side of
> whatever box you have connected to eth0
>
> You might also try:traceroute and see whether we
> can determine anything from that.

Bruce:

The 'route' command yields a *totally* blank routing table.  
'Traceroute' gives:

traceroute to www.cybermesa.com (209.12.73.3), 30 hops max, 40 byte 
packets
 1  10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1)  2 ms  1 ms  1 ms
 2  66.55.21.1 (66.55.21.1)  51 ms  56 ms  56 ms
 3  www.cybermesa.com (209.12.73.3)  56 ms  54 ms  56 ms

FYI:  I rebooted into windoze and downloaded IP Agent (IP_Agent.exe) 
from grc.com and ran it from windoze.  It said that addresses such as 
mine (10.0.0.2 - current dynamic address) are recyclable, and 
"unreachable from the external public Internet, and thus secure against 
typical threats and discovery from passing Internet scanners."

Regards,

Glenn

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 04:43 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Bruce and Tim:
>
> Thanks for your help and comments.  More info follows, below:
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 13:32, you wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Hey Glenn:
> >
> > I assume you have only one nic card in your machine
> >
> > What is the output of your 'route' command?
> >
> > The problem is to find out what your IP address is on the far side of
> > whatever box you have connected to eth0
> >
> > You might also try:traceroute and see whether we
> > can determine anything from that.
>
> Bruce:
>
> The 'route' command yields a *totally* blank routing table.
> 'Traceroute' gives:
>
> traceroute to www.cybermesa.com (209.12.73.3), 30 hops max, 40 byte
> packets
>  1  10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1)  2 ms  1 ms  1 ms
>  2  66.55.21.1 (66.55.21.1)  51 ms  56 ms  56 ms
>  3  www.cybermesa.com (209.12.73.3)  56 ms  54 ms  56 ms
>
> FYI:  I rebooted into windoze and downloaded IP Agent (IP_Agent.exe)
> from grc.com and ran it from windoze.  It said that addresses such as
> mine (10.0.0.2 - current dynamic address) are recyclable, and
> "unreachable from the external public Internet, and thus secure against
> typical threats and discovery from passing Internet scanners."
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 18:47  +
++
" Ever stop to think, and forget to start again?"
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 04:43 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Bruce and Tim:
>
> Thanks for your help and comments.  More info follows, below:
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 13:32, you wrote:
>

Try this sometime:


 1)  Send me an email that you are about to:

2)  telnet  bmarsh.com

I can then match up the email time with the time that I find someone knocking 
on my door..

Just for grins



++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 18:48  +
++
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice,"
"but in practice... there is no similarity between theory and practice."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Glenn Williams

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 16:49, you wrote:

> Try this sometime:
>
>
>  1)  Send me an email that you are about to:
>
> 2)  telnet  bmarsh.com
>
> I can then match up the email time with the time that I find someone
> knocking on my door..
>
> Just for grins


Okay, Bruce:

Here goes...  I don't know what to expect, so I'll just 'wing it.'
It is 5:42 MDT.
-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 07:44 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Here goes...  I don't know what to expect, so I'll just 'wing it.'
> It is 5:42 MDT.

MDT??   MDT??oh sure, make it really tough on me...:o)


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 20:12  +
++
"The average woman would rather have beauty than brains, because the
average man can see better than he can think."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-04 Thread Joel Hammer

 DENY  tcp  l- 0xFF 0x00  eth1 0.0.0.0/0  24.182.146.18 * ->   1:1023 
 rule protocol log Who knows  NIC  any ip   my ip  from any port to your ports
  
Translation:
Deny tcp packets, logging it, Huh??, to my eth1 from any ip on the planet to
the ip address of the NIC of my router (which connects to the internet)
from any port to my ports 1 to 1023.
ip's are in dot quad format with a netmask if needed.
0.0.0.0. is host 0.0.0.0 but 0.0.0.0/0 is any ip.
127.0.0.0/24 is the local host.
Firewalls are simple once you have the few rules figured out. Here is a
simple rule from my firewall. It denies all requests from any host to my
internet facing NIC to access the ports from 1 to 1023 (These are the
privileged ports to which various services, like ftp, telnet, printing, and
others listen for requests for services. You likely didn't know that port
515 (port for printing local or network files) is ripe for exploitation.

You are at a crucial stage. If you don't learn this simple stuff, you will
be like those poor souls in Shakespeare, who, not catching the tide at its
flood, will wallow in the shallows, etc., at least as far as security.

For your own good, and for the good of your security, firewalls are way too
important to leave to magic security scripts.
You should know which other ports you have to protect, like 6000 (your X server)
and make sure to prevent unwanted people from attaching to such services.
I just edit my firewall using vi. It is so simple that way.
ipchains-save > file
Edit the file
ipchains -F; cat file | ipchains-restore -f
Piece of cake.
Buy a book or read about firewalls. You have been warned.
In addition, if you want to arrange ipmasq or use nonstandard ports for
services (Say, to disguise your web page from your ISP which bans such
things), knowing about firewalls is essential. 
Joel
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



RE: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Wil McGilvery

What is your gateway address?

Also, This may be a bit cheesy, but what is the IP address that is shown when you have 
your have your shields tested at www.grc.com?

Regards,
 
Wil McGilvery
Manager, Digital Media

 
Lynch Technologies Inc.
416-744-7191
1-888-622-3729
416-744-0406  FAX
www.lynchdigital.com
 
 
 

 
 
 

-Original Message-
From: Bruce Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Personal firewall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 02:58 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Bruce:
>
> Sorry - I guess I neglected to mention - as of last Thursday I am on
> DSL - hot all the time.  No dial-up or dial-on-demand.
>

Well, I think then that the ISP has you on a local network.  I am pretty sure 
that 10.0.0.x is one of those 'non-routable' addresses and therefore your box 
can't be accessed.

Maybe someone else can give us a clue.



> Anything else I should furnish?
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:42 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > Hi, Bruce:
> > >
> > > Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of
> > > 'ifconfig' (long form):
> >
> > Well yes,   but don't you dial up on the phone??   I would need the
> > ppp0 part of the ifconfig  output.   The  10.0.0.2  address must be
> > your local LAN address.
> >
> > > eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5
> > >
> > >   inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> > >   ^^^
> > >   inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> > >   inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> > >   UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> > >   RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > >   TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > >   collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> > >   RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9 Kb)
> > >   Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Glenn
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
> > > > On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > > > Hi, Bruce:
> > > > >
> > > > > I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP server, so
> > > > > I dunno how we could do that using my IP address.  Cann one use
> > > > > the current dynamic address for that purpose?
> > > >
> > > > Yes...  you would:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Connect up and stay connected.
> > > >
> > > > 2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.
> > > >
> > > > 3) Send me email with same.
> > > >
> > > > 4) I run the scan.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +
> > > > + + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire,
> > > > MI 09/04/01 11:56  +
> > > > +
> > > > + "Whenever I think of the past, it brings back so
> > > > many memories..." ___
> > > > http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> > > > ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 15:06  +
++
"I'm just working here till a good fast-food job opens up."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Glenn Williams

Hi, Joel:

Thanks for the firewall tutorial.  I'm sure it will be useful, once 
I've digested all the information in it.  I'm grateful to you for 
taking the time to send this to me.

I have some books on TCP/IP and one which specifically covers firewalls 
and Internet security, but they are obsolete - written in the mid-90s 
when I was using TCP/IP in amateur packet radio networks.

I'm using the SuSE 7.2 Pro "personal firewall" which is 
non-configurable.  It's either enabled or disabled, and that's about 
it.  However, there's a SuSE Firewall that ships with this distro, and 
it is *very* configurable.  So I will examine that with deeper scrutiny.

I'll also check amazon.com for what books are available on-line about 
firewalls and security.

Thanks again for the advice and information.

73 de Glenn

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 18:25, you wrote:
>  DENY  tcp  l- 0xFF 0x00  eth1 0.0.0.0/0  24.182.146.18 * ->  
> 1:1023 rule protocol log Who knows  NIC  any ip   my ip  from any
> port to your ports
>
> Translation:
> Deny tcp packets, logging it, Huh??, to my eth1 from any ip on the
> planet to the ip address of the NIC of my router (which connects to
> the internet) from any port to my ports 1 to 1023.
> ip's are in dot quad format with a netmask if needed.
> 0.0.0.0. is host 0.0.0.0 but 0.0.0.0/0 is any ip.
> 127.0.0.0/24 is the local host.
> Firewalls are simple once you have the few rules figured out. Here is
> a simple rule from my firewall. It denies all requests from any host
> to my internet facing NIC to access the ports from 1 to 1023 (These
> are the privileged ports to which various services, like ftp, telnet,
> printing, and others listen for requests for services. You likely
> didn't know that port 515 (port for printing local or network files)
> is ripe for exploitation.
>
> You are at a crucial stage. If you don't learn this simple stuff, you
> will be like those poor souls in Shakespeare, who, not catching the
> tide at its flood, will wallow in the shallows, etc., at least as far
> as security.
>
> For your own good, and for the good of your security, firewalls are
> way too important to leave to magic security scripts.
> You should know which other ports you have to protect, like 6000
> (your X server) and make sure to prevent unwanted people from
> attaching to such services. I just edit my firewall using vi. It is
> so simple that way.
> ipchains-save > file
> Edit the file
> ipchains -F; cat file | ipchains-restore -f
> Piece of cake.
> Buy a book or read about firewalls. You have been warned.
> In addition, if you want to arrange ipmasq or use nonstandard ports
> for services (Say, to disguise your web page from your ISP which bans
> such things), knowing about firewalls is essential.
> Joel
> ___
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional

___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Glenn Williams

Wil:

Here's the info route -n returned:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse 
Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 
eth0
0.0.0.0 10.0.0.10.0.0.0 UG0  00 
eth0

grc.com was not much help.  First of all, I had to switch to windoze 
and a different firewall.  They report my IP address as 10.0.0.2, and 
then gave me a boilerplate blurb about how IETF in their wisdom set 
aside a large block of addresses for internal network use (which was 
rather astute, and all very true, of course).

Thanks.

Regards,

Glenn


On Wednesday 05 September 2001 06:03, you wrote:
> What is your gateway address?
>
> Also, This may be a bit cheesy, but what is the IP address that is
> shown when you have your have your shields tested at www.grc.com?
>
> Regards,
>
> Wil McGilvery
> Manager, Digital Media
>
>
> Lynch Technologies Inc.
> 416-744-7191
> 1-888-622-3729
> 416-744-0406  FAX
> www.lynchdigital.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Personal firewall
>
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 02:58 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Bruce:
> >
> > Sorry - I guess I neglected to mention - as of last Thursday I am
> > on DSL - hot all the time.  No dial-up or dial-on-demand.
>
> Well, I think then that the ISP has you on a local network.  I am
> pretty sure that 10.0.0.x is one of those 'non-routable' addresses
> and therefore your box can't be accessed.
>
> Maybe someone else can give us a clue.
>
> > Anything else I should furnish?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Glenn
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 01:42 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > > Hi, Bruce:
> > > >
> > > > Busy morning - later getting back to you.  Here's the output of
> > > > 'ifconfig' (long form):
> > >
> > > Well yes,   but don't you dial up on the phone??   I would need
> > > the ppp0 part of the ifconfig  output.   The  10.0.0.2  address
> > > must be your local LAN address.
> > >
> > > > eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:03:47:95:E1:B5
> > > >
> > > >   inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.0.0.255 
> > > > Mask:255.255.255.0 ^^^
> > > >   inet6 addr: fe80::203:47ff:fe95:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> > > >   inet6 addr: fe80::3:4795:e1b5/10 Scope:Link
> > > >   UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> > > >   RX packets:72619 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > > frame:0 TX packets:8775 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> > > >   RX bytes:9553606 (9.1 Mb)  TX bytes:1018790 (994.9
> > > > Kb) Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf000
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Glenn
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 09:56, you wrote:
> > > > > On Monday 03 September 2001 10:32 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > > > > Hi, Bruce:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I appreciate the offer.  However, my ISP uses a DHCP
> > > > > > server, so I dunno how we could do that using my IP
> > > > > > address.  Cann one use the current dynamic address for that
> > > > > > purpose?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes...  you would:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) Connect up and stay connected.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) Do an ifconfig to find your current IP address.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) Send me email with same.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) I run the scan.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > >  + + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > > Bellaire, MI 09/04/01 11:56  +
> > > > > +
> > > > >  + "Whenever I think of the past, it brings
> > > > > back so many memories..."
> > > > > ___
> > > > > http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> > > > > ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Tim Wunder

Glenn Williams wrote:




> grc.com was not much help.  First of all, I had to switch to windoze 
> and a different firewall.  They report my IP address as 10.0.0.2, and 
> then gave me a boilerplate blurb about how IETF in their wisdom set 
> aside a large block of addresses for internal network use (which was 
> rather astute, and all very true, of course).
> 
> Thanks.



IIRC, you downloaded and ran IP_agent. That does require windows to run, it's a 
windows program. grc.com offers a "Shields Up" scan that tells you you external 
IP address, the IP that the Internet sees. I just navigated to the shields up 
page from RedHat, https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2, running the scan is not 
OS-specific.

On that screen, just navigate down past the "Free IP Agent" BS and click on the 
button for "Test My Shields!". There's also a button there for a minimal Port 
scan.


No download of any software should be required.


HTH,
Tim




___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 21:30 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> I'm using the SuSE 7.2 Pro "personal firewall" which is
> non-configurable.  It's either enabled or disabled, and that's about
> it.  However, there's a SuSE Firewall that ships with this distro, and
> it is *very* configurable.  So I will examine that with deeper scrutiny.

Are you talking about  SuSEfirewall2 ??   It seems pretty good.


-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/05/01 10:57  +
++
"All the world's a stage and the people on it are poorly rehearsed."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Glenn Williams

On Wednesday 05 September 2001 08:58, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 21:30 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > I'm using the SuSE 7.2 Pro "personal firewall" which is
> > non-configurable.  It's either enabled or disabled, and that's
> > about it.  However, there's a SuSE Firewall that ships with this
> > distro, and it is *very* configurable.  So I will examine that with
> > deeper scrutiny.
>
> Are you talking about  SuSEfirewall2 ??   It seems pretty good.

Yep, that's the one.  SuSE ships two firewalls - "personal firewall" 
which I'm using now, and the configurable SuSEFirewall, which I will 
probably switch to in the future when I am somewhat more knowledgeable, 
i.e. 5 or 10 years.

73 de Glenn

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Glenn Williams



Thanks, Tim:

Obviously I did not read the info on the grc site carefully.  I'll give 
that a try.

Regards,

Glenn

On Wednesday 05 September 2001 08:57, you wrote:
> Glenn Williams wrote:
>
> 
>
> > grc.com was not much help.  First of all, I had to switch to
> > windoze and a different firewall.  They report my IP address as
> > 10.0.0.2, and then gave me a boilerplate blurb about how IETF in
> > their wisdom set aside a large block of addresses for internal
> > network use (which was rather astute, and all very true, of
> > course).
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> 
>
>
> IIRC, you downloaded and ran IP_agent. That does require windows to
> run, it's a windows program. grc.com offers a "Shields Up" scan that
> tells you you external IP address, the IP that the Internet sees. I
> just navigated to the shields up page from RedHat,
> https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2, running the scan is not
> OS-specific.
>
> On that screen, just navigate down past the "Free IP Agent" BS and
> click on the button for "Test My Shields!". There's also a button
> there for a minimal Port scan.
>
>
> No download of any software should be required.
>
>
> HTH,
> Tim
>
>
>
>
> ___
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 11:28 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2001 08:58, you wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 September 2001 21:30 pm, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > > I'm using the SuSE 7.2 Pro "personal firewall" which is
> > > non-configurable.  It's either enabled or disabled, and that's
> > > about it.  However, there's a SuSE Firewall that ships with this
> > > distro, and it is *very* configurable.  So I will examine that with
> > > deeper scrutiny.
> >
> > Are you talking about  SuSEfirewall2 ??   It seems pretty good.
>
> Yep, that's the one.  SuSE ships two firewalls - "personal firewall"
> which I'm using now, and the configurable SuSEFirewall, which I will
> probably switch to in the future when I am somewhat more knowledgeable,
> i.e. 5 or 10 years.
>

Firewall2   is on a special site.   It is different than  SuSEfirewall

(don't have the site handy)


> 73 de Glenn

-- 
++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/05/01 11:51  +
++
"Mind like a steel trap -  rusty and illegal in 37 states."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Bruce Marshall

On Tuesday 04 September 2001 11:30 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> Thanks, Tim:
>
> Obviously I did not read the info on the grc site carefully.  I'll give
> that a try.
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn
>

Here's your NMAP scan:

Starting nmap V. 2.53 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
Interesting ports on  (66.55.21.94):
(The 1522 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
Port   State   Service
23/tcp opentelnet
 
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2228 seconds


One port open...  and just the port you don't want open.

And here's what I got when I tried to telnet to it:

bmarsh@linux1:~ > telnet xxx.xx.21.94
Trying xxx.xx.21.94...
Connected to xxx.xx.21.94.
Escape character is '^]'.
 
 
User Access Verification
Password:*
Password:**
Password:


Didn't ask for a userid  so maybe this is your router responding  and it just 
needs a password.

In any event, looks like your pretty well protected.

++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/05/01 12:20  +
++
Murphy's Eighth Corollary:
   "It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools
  are so ingenious."
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-05 Thread Glenn Williams

Bruce:

Thanks for the scan and analysis.  I found a couple of my old books on 
TCP/IP (published in '91 and '92 respectively), but could not find the 
one called 'Internet Security and Firewalls' so I will be browsing 
amazon.com for something along those lines.

If anyone has a favorite title or recommendation, I'd like to hear it 
while I'm in a browsing mode.

Best regards,

Glenn

On Wednesday 05 September 2001 10:23, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 September 2001 11:30 am, Glenn Williams wrote:
> > Thanks, Tim:
> >
> > Obviously I did not read the info on the grc site carefully.  I'll
> > give that a try.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Glenn
>
> Here's your NMAP scan:
>
> Starting nmap V. 2.53 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( www.insecure.org/nmap/
> ) RTTVAR has grown to over 2.3 seconds, decreasing to 2.0
> Interesting ports on  (66.55.21.94):
> (The 1522 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
> Port   State   Service
> 23/tcp opentelnet
>
> Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2228
> seconds
>
>
> One port open...  and just the port you don't want open.
>
> And here's what I got when I tried to telnet to it:
>
> bmarsh@linux1:~ > telnet xxx.xx.21.94
> Trying xxx.xx.21.94...
> Connected to xxx.xx.21.94.
> Escape character is '^]'.
>
>
> User Access Verification
> Password:*
> Password:**
> Password:
>
>
> Didn't ask for a userid  so maybe this is your router responding  and
> it just needs a password.
>
> In any event, looks like your pretty well protected.
>
> +
>+ + Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI
> 09/05/01 12:20  +
> +
>+ Murphy's Eighth Corollary:
>"It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools
>   are so ingenious."
> ___
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-06 Thread Bruce Marshall

Thought you might want to make a note of this site:


http://www.whatismyip.com/


++
+ Bruce S. Marshall  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bellaire, MI 09/06/01 11:29  +
++
"Books are good enough in their own way, but they are a mighty bloodless
  substitute for life." - Robert Louis Stevenson
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Personal firewall

2001-09-06 Thread Glenn Williams

Very cool, Bruce:

Thanks for posting this.  I have it bookmarked.

73 de Glenn

On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:30, you wrote:
> Thought you might want to make a note of this site:
>
>
> http://www.whatismyip.com/
>

-- 
Glenn Williams - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User #135678
Powered by SuSE 7.2 Linux Professional
___
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users