Re: Test 3

[kwall]

On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 08:32:42PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote:
 
 It was my understanding that the list standard required, nay, demanded
 a humourous anecdote for such dalliances.

Gasp! Horror! I have been remiss. Keith is correct. With the completion 
of my latest book project, I was able to replace Red Hat 7.2 with Slackware.
Easily accomplished, except that Slackware's default Sendmail configuration
is rather stringent: list email was bouncing with relaying denied messages
and I needed to use Cw kurtwerks.com in sendmail.cf to let Sendmail
know that the box receives mail for kurtwerks.com. I'd really like to
get rid of the utterly lax mail relaying from the configuration file, but
I've been stymied about how to do it without creating an ongoing maintenance
nightmare for myself.

Sorry, a little light on the humor. I suppose there is nothing funny
about Sendmail configuration. It occurs to me that someone had to
think up this mess -- SICK AND WRONG!

Kurt
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

OT Re: Test 3

[Zoki]

-On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 08:32:42PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote:
- 
- It was my understanding that the list standard required, nay, demanded
- a humourous anecdote for such dalliances.


*** Quite so! In fact this standard demands a
seveere punishment for the unrespectful:  
Thou shall write an anecdote or thou shall be tied to a 486DX-66 with
Windows XP and be forced to reinstall it untill thou can't anymore, or
something very terrible like that...

--
Cheers,
Zoran.




___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Re: Test 3

[Keith Morse]

It was my understanding that the list standard required, nay, demanded
a humourous anecdote for such dalliances.

___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users