Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user if loading firmware file with NVRAM fails

2017-02-16 Thread Rafał Miłecki

On 2017-02-16 02:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Rafał Miłecki  
wrote:

From: Rafał Miłecki 

This isn't critical as we use platform NVRAM as fallback and it's very
common case of all Broadcom home routers. Thanks for the new firmware
loading function we can achieve this by simply passing FW_OPT_NO_WARN.



What kind of warning you are talking about?

On Intel Edison brcmfmac isn't backed up by NVRAM (there no such) and
the platform is not ACPI-based. The warning might be crucial for
debugging Wi-Fi issues on such platforms.


Sorry, I should have tried better with that commit message. V2 in a 
second.


Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user if loading firmware file with NVRAM fails

2017-02-15 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Rafał Miłecki  wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki 
>
> This isn't critical as we use platform NVRAM as fallback and it's very
> common case of all Broadcom home routers. Thanks for the new firmware
> loading function we can achieve this by simply passing FW_OPT_NO_WARN.
>

What kind of warning you are talking about?

On Intel Edison brcmfmac isn't backed up by NVRAM (there no such) and
the platform is not ACPI-based. The warning might be crucial for
debugging Wi-Fi issues on such platforms.

> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki 
> ---
> Kalle, Arend: this patch is strictly related to the bigger 1/2. Could you ack
> this change as I expect this patchset to be picked by Ming, Luis or Greg.
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
> index c7c1e9906500..26ec445a8d2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
> @@ -504,9 +504,9 @@ static void brcmf_fw_request_code_done(const struct 
> firmware *fw, void *ctx)
> return;
> }
> fwctx->code = fw;
> -   ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, true, fwctx->nvram_name,
> - fwctx->dev, GFP_KERNEL, fwctx,
> - brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done);
> +   ret = request_firmware_async(THIS_MODULE, FW_OPT_NO_WARN,
> +fwctx->nvram_name, fwctx->dev, 
> GFP_KERNEL,
> +fwctx, brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done);
>
> if (!ret)
> return;
> --
> 2.11.0
>



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko