Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ath10k: Configure rxnss_override for 10.4 firmware.
On Freitag, 16. Juni 2017 08:50:13 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > We have hw_params for stuff like this so I changed this and the > following patch to use that. Please review: Looks good. Thanks for adjusting the patches. Kind regards, Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ath10k: Configure rxnss_override for 10.4 firmware.
Sven Eckelmannwrites: > From: Ben Greear > > QCA9984 hardware can do 4x4 at 80Mhz, but only 2x2 at 160Mhz. > > First, report this to user-space by setting the max-tx-speed > and max-rx-speed vht capabilities. > > Second, if the peer rx-speed is configured, and if we > are in 160 or 80+80 mode, and the peer rx-speed matches > the max speed for 2x2 or 1x1 at 160Mhz (long guard interval), > then use that info to set the peer_bw_rxnss_override appropriately. > > Without this, a 9984 firmware will not use 2x2 ratesets when > transmitting to peer (it will be stuck at 1x1), because > the firmware would not have configured the rxnss_override. > > This could use some testing Sven, I assume you have tested this so I removed the last sentence. > @@ -4408,6 +4422,23 @@ static struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap > ath10k_create_vht_cap(struct ath10k *ar) > vht_cap.vht_mcs.rx_mcs_map = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); > vht_cap.vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); > > + /* If we are supporting 160Mhz or 80+80, then the NIC may be able to do > + * a restricted NSS for 160 or 80+80 vs what it can do for 80Mhz. Give > + * user-space a clue if that is the case. > + */ > + if (vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK) { > + switch (ar->dev_id) { > + case QCA9984_1_0_DEVICE_ID: > + /* Can do only 2x2 VHT160 or 80+80. > + * 1560Mbps is 4x4 80Mhz or 2x2 160Mhz, > + * long-guard-interval > + */ > + vht_cap.vht_mcs.rx_highest = 1560; > + vht_cap.vht_mcs.tx_highest = 1560; > + break; > + } > + } We have hw_params for stuff like this so I changed this and the following patch to use that. Please review: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending=81f55f2a3e1837287a52de6577ca89a2c7393456 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending=09ce674529472c8deca41fbb28bad59e03330321 -- Kalle Valo
Re: [v2,2/3] ath10k: Configure rxnss_override for 10.4 firmware.
Sven Eckelmannwrote: > QCA9984 hardware can do 4x4 at 80Mhz, but only 2x2 at 160Mhz. > > First, report this to user-space by setting the max-tx-speed > and max-rx-speed vht capabilities. > > Second, if the peer rx-speed is configured, and if we > are in 160 or 80+80 mode, and the peer rx-speed matches > the max speed for 2x2 or 1x1 at 160Mhz (long guard interval), > then use that info to set the peer_bw_rxnss_override appropriately. > > Without this, a 9984 firmware will not use 2x2 ratesets when > transmitting to peer (it will be stuck at 1x1), because > the firmware would not have configured the rxnss_override. > > This could use some testing > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear > [sven.eckelm...@openmesh.com: rebase, cleanup, drop 160Mhz workaround cleanup] > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo This one had warnings, fixed in pending branch: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:4436:52: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:4436:52:expected restricted __le16 [assigned] [usertype] rx_highest drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:4436:52:got int drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:4437:52: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:4437:52:expected restricted __le16 [assigned] [usertype] tx_highest drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:4437:52:got int -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9778087/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
[PATCH v2 2/3] ath10k: Configure rxnss_override for 10.4 firmware.
From: Ben GreearQCA9984 hardware can do 4x4 at 80Mhz, but only 2x2 at 160Mhz. First, report this to user-space by setting the max-tx-speed and max-rx-speed vht capabilities. Second, if the peer rx-speed is configured, and if we are in 160 or 80+80 mode, and the peer rx-speed matches the max speed for 2x2 or 1x1 at 160Mhz (long guard interval), then use that info to set the peer_bw_rxnss_override appropriately. Without this, a 9984 firmware will not use 2x2 ratesets when transmitting to peer (it will be stuck at 1x1), because the firmware would not have configured the rxnss_override. This could use some testing Signed-off-by: Ben Greear [sven.eckelm...@openmesh.com: rebase, cleanup, drop 160Mhz workaround cleanup] Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann --- v2: - rebased patch - minor cleanups - removal of the 160 MHz workaround (see patch 1) drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 31 +++ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 7 ++- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c index 8087b6be5484..0752cf351b4a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c @@ -2519,6 +2519,20 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); + + if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate && + (sta->vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)) { + switch (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate) { + case 1560: + /* Must be 2x2 at 160Mhz is all it can do. */ + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 2; + break; + case 780: + /* Can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz (Long Guard Interval) */ + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 1; + break; + } + } } static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(struct ath10k *ar, @@ -4408,6 +4422,23 @@ static struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap ath10k_create_vht_cap(struct ath10k *ar) vht_cap.vht_mcs.rx_mcs_map = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); vht_cap.vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); + /* If we are supporting 160Mhz or 80+80, then the NIC may be able to do +* a restricted NSS for 160 or 80+80 vs what it can do for 80Mhz. Give +* user-space a clue if that is the case. +*/ + if (vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK) { + switch (ar->dev_id) { + case QCA9984_1_0_DEVICE_ID: + /* Can do only 2x2 VHT160 or 80+80. +* 1560Mbps is 4x4 80Mhz or 2x2 160Mhz, +* long-guard-interval +*/ + vht_cap.vht_mcs.rx_highest = 1560; + vht_cap.vht_mcs.tx_highest = 1560; + break; + } + } + return vht_cap; } diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c index 6afc8d27f0d5..2c3b0214ba5f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c @@ -6757,7 +6757,12 @@ ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_4(struct ath10k *ar, void *buf, struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd *cmd = buf; ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_2(ar, buf, arg); - cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; + if (arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override) + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = + __cpu_to_le32((arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override - 1) | + BIT(PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET)); + else + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; } static int diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h index 1b4865a55595..dd6cac150749 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h @@ -6028,6 +6028,7 @@ struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { __le32 info0; /* WMI_PEER_ASSOC_INFO0_ */ } __packed; +#define PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET 31 struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd cmd; __le32 peer_bw_rxnss_override; @@ -6051,6 +6052,7 @@ struct wmi_peer_assoc_complete_arg { u32 peer_vht_caps; enum wmi_phy_mode peer_phymode; struct wmi_vht_rate_set_arg peer_vht_rates; + u32 peer_bw_rxnss_override; }; struct wmi_peer_add_wds_entry_cmd { -- 2.11.0
Re: ath10k: Configure rxnss_override for 10.4 firmware.
On Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2017 01:26:58 CEST Kalle Valo wrote: > Ben Greearwrote: > > From: Ben Greear > > > > QCA9984 hardware can do 4x4 at 80Mhz, but only 2x2 at 160Mhz. [] > Does not apply: > > error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:2760 > error: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c: patch does not apply > error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h:6173 > error: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h: patch does not apply > stg import: Diff does not apply cleanly > > Patch set to Changes Requested. I wanted to use this patch to announce the maximum speed for QCA9888. I hope it is ok for Ben Greear when I rebase and resubmit it. Kind regards, Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: ath10k: Configure rxnss_override for 10.4 firmware.
Ben Greearwrote: > From: Ben Greear > > QCA9984 hardware can do 4x4 at 80Mhz, but only 2x2 at 160Mhz. > > First, report this to user-space by setting the max-tx-speed > and max-rx-speed vht capabilities. > > Second, if the peer rx-speed is configured, and if we > are in 160 or 80+80 mode, and the peer rx-speed matches > the max speed for 2x2 or 1x1 at 160Mhz (long guard interval), > then use that info to set the peer_bw_rxnss_override appropriately. > > Without this, a 9984 firmware will not use 2x2 ratesets when > transmitting to peer (it will be stuck at 1x1), because > the firmware would not have configured the rxnss_override. > > This could use some testing > > Signed-off-by: Ben Greear Does not apply: error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c:2760 error: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c: patch does not apply error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h:6173 error: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h: patch does not apply stg import: Diff does not apply cleanly Patch set to Changes Requested. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9567655/ Documentation about submitting wireless patches and checking status from patchwork: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
[PATCH] ath10k: Configure rxnss_override for 10.4 firmware.
From: Ben GreearQCA9984 hardware can do 4x4 at 80Mhz, but only 2x2 at 160Mhz. First, report this to user-space by setting the max-tx-speed and max-rx-speed vht capabilities. Second, if the peer rx-speed is configured, and if we are in 160 or 80+80 mode, and the peer rx-speed matches the max speed for 2x2 or 1x1 at 160Mhz (long guard interval), then use that info to set the peer_bw_rxnss_override appropriately. Without this, a 9984 firmware will not use 2x2 ratesets when transmitting to peer (it will be stuck at 1x1), because the firmware would not have configured the rxnss_override. This could use some testing Signed-off-by: Ben Greear --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 30 +- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 7 ++- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c index b9c9105..0bde1db 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c @@ -2760,6 +2760,18 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags, arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate, arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_mcs_set, arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_max_rate, arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set); + + if ((arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate) && + (sta->vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)) { + if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate == 1560) { + /* Must be 2x2 at 160Mhz is all it can do. */ + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 2; + } + else if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate == 780) { + /* Can only do 1x2 at 160Mhz (Long Guard Interval) */ + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 1; + } + } } static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(struct ath10k *ar, @@ -4899,7 +4911,8 @@ static struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap ath10k_create_vht_cap(struct ath10k *ar) vht_cap.cap |= val; } - if ((ar->vht_cap_info & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SHORT_GI_160) && !(ar->vht_cap_info & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160_80PLUS80MHZ)) { + if ((ar->vht_cap_info & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SHORT_GI_160) && + ((ar->vht_cap_info & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK) == 0)) { vht_cap.cap |= IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ; } @@ -4917,6 +4930,21 @@ static struct ieee80211_sta_vht_cap ath10k_create_vht_cap(struct ath10k *ar) vht_cap.vht_mcs.rx_mcs_map = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); vht_cap.vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); + /* If we are supporting 160Mhz or 80+80, then the NIC may be able to do a restricted NSS +* for 160 or 80+80 vs what it can do for 80Mhz. Give user-space a clue if that is the +* case. +*/ + if (vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK) { + /* Something more than 80Mhz at least */ + if (ar->dev_id == QCA9984_1_0_DEVICE_ID) { + /* Can do only 2x2 VHT160 or 80+80. +* 1560Mbps is 4x4 80Mhz or 2x2 160Mhz, long-guard-interval +*/ + vht_cap.vht_mcs.rx_highest = 1560; + vht_cap.vht_mcs.tx_highest = 1560; + } + } + return vht_cap; } diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c index 38db6be..05ca7f5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c @@ -7036,7 +7036,12 @@ ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_4(struct ath10k *ar, void *buf, struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd *cmd = buf; ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_2(ar, buf, arg); - cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; + if (arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override) + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = + __cpu_to_le32((arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override - 1) | + (1< peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; } static int diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h index 5a71bb4..ccbb1bc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h @@ -6173,6 +6173,7 @@ struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd_ct { struct wmi_ct_assoc_overrides overrides; } __packed; +#define PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET 31 struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd cmd; __le32 peer_bw_rxnss_override; @@ -6201,6 +6202,7 @@ struct wmi_peer_assoc_complete_arg { u32 peer_vht_caps; enum wmi_phy_mode