Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Fix standard/base pollution
On 2016-09-30 5:32 PM, Cal Sullivan wrote: On 09/30/2016 01:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2016-09-30 4:46 PM, California Sullivan wrote: Hi Bruce, Saul, A while back before we created the standard/intel/base branches some patches that were not appropriate for standard/base were merged into the branch and caused bug [YOCTO #9587]. This patch set aims to fix that. The first patch reverts the inappropriate patches in standard/base. The second patch reverts the revert and is intended for standard/intel/base after the first revert patch waterfalls into it. I know this is kind of kludgey but I believe its the right thing to do. Let me know if you think otherwise. I can do the individual reverts, rather than via a single patch. Just provide the commit IDs (which you did in your email, so that is fine). I can then apply those same changes to standard/intel/base again. That way we keep a 1:1 commit granularity. If git objects, I can go the route of these patches :D Bruce That will work! I forgot to mention, this is intended for the 4.1 tree. The 4.4 tree has more inappropriate patches and their order matters. Here are the commit IDs in an order that reverted cleanly for me: 4086f8c349569926fd8fbe967ec24bdeabc79f95 0148b3601f29b159b4f84c1478ff1859bbd48efe 08943f2bbd507f8b7f5ef101ccc4755cbec79aad a517d5b72e764ec22f0055edeb685c102051239e cd83f4095b234652ae65321f35700f7e3441f0f9 I was able to do the reverts for 4.1 and 4.4 in standard/base and then cherry pick the same commits back into standard/intel/base, standard/preempt-rt/intel/base and standard/tiny/intel/base This is along with some -stable updates that I have staged, so we'll need those to get these changes. If anything is broken, send patches or exact sequences of commits to revert/cherry-pick. Cheers, Bruce Thanks, Cal Thanks, Cal California Sullivan (2): Revert Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits in standard/base Reapply Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits removed from standard/base -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Fix standard/base pollution
On 09/30/2016 01:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2016-09-30 4:46 PM, California Sullivan wrote: Hi Bruce, Saul, A while back before we created the standard/intel/base branches some patches that were not appropriate for standard/base were merged into the branch and caused bug [YOCTO #9587]. This patch set aims to fix that. The first patch reverts the inappropriate patches in standard/base. The second patch reverts the revert and is intended for standard/intel/base after the first revert patch waterfalls into it. I know this is kind of kludgey but I believe its the right thing to do. Let me know if you think otherwise. I can do the individual reverts, rather than via a single patch. Just provide the commit IDs (which you did in your email, so that is fine). I can then apply those same changes to standard/intel/base again. That way we keep a 1:1 commit granularity. If git objects, I can go the route of these patches :D Bruce That will work! I forgot to mention, this is intended for the 4.1 tree. The 4.4 tree has more inappropriate patches and their order matters. Here are the commit IDs in an order that reverted cleanly for me: 4086f8c349569926fd8fbe967ec24bdeabc79f95 0148b3601f29b159b4f84c1478ff1859bbd48efe 08943f2bbd507f8b7f5ef101ccc4755cbec79aad a517d5b72e764ec22f0055edeb685c102051239e cd83f4095b234652ae65321f35700f7e3441f0f9 Thanks, Cal Thanks, Cal California Sullivan (2): Revert Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits in standard/base Reapply Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits removed from standard/base -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Fix standard/base pollution
On 2016-09-30 4:46 PM, California Sullivan wrote: Hi Bruce, Saul, A while back before we created the standard/intel/base branches some patches that were not appropriate for standard/base were merged into the branch and caused bug [YOCTO #9587]. This patch set aims to fix that. The first patch reverts the inappropriate patches in standard/base. The second patch reverts the revert and is intended for standard/intel/base after the first revert patch waterfalls into it. I know this is kind of kludgey but I believe its the right thing to do. Let me know if you think otherwise. I can do the individual reverts, rather than via a single patch. Just provide the commit IDs (which you did in your email, so that is fine). I can then apply those same changes to standard/intel/base again. That way we keep a 1:1 commit granularity. If git objects, I can go the route of these patches :D Bruce Thanks, Cal California Sullivan (2): Revert Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits in standard/base Reapply Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits removed from standard/base -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
[linux-yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Fix standard/base pollution
Hi Bruce, Saul, A while back before we created the standard/intel/base branches some patches that were not appropriate for standard/base were merged into the branch and caused bug [YOCTO #9587]. This patch set aims to fix that. The first patch reverts the inappropriate patches in standard/base. The second patch reverts the revert and is intended for standard/intel/base after the first revert patch waterfalls into it. I know this is kind of kludgey but I believe its the right thing to do. Let me know if you think otherwise. Thanks, Cal California Sullivan (2): Revert Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits in standard/base Reapply Upstream-status: Inappropriate commits removed from standard/base -- 2.5.5 -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto