RE: K8 D0 support

2004-12-08 Thread YhLu
>Long term I wish we had a better way to handle development before the
official
>product launch.

I think if I can keep pace with normal bios development, I can get updated
detail info from vendor and our BIOS engineers. Otherwise they may forget
some detail info and also some vendors may fail to update their datasheet.
Then it may take some time to make Linuxbios work.

YH
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: K8 D0 support

2004-12-07 Thread Eric W. Biederman
"Yinghai Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The D0 is released last week. And Normal BIOS support it already.
> 
> Thanks for your great job in raminit.c of K8 and others, and I add several
> lines to reflect the new mapping of memory bank.

Cool.

I am confused about what the current situation is.  All I know for
certain is that AMD has not updated their public documentation yet.  So it does
not appear as if these processors have been released to the public.

Long term I wish we had a better way to handle development before the official
product launch.

Eric
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


RE: K8 D0 support

2004-12-05 Thread Yinghai Lu
The D0 is released last week. And Normal BIOS support it already.

Thanks for your great job in raminit.c of K8 and others, and I add several
lines to reflect the new mapping of memory bank.

Regards

Yinghai Lu

-Original Message-
From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric W.
Biederman
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 4:12 PM
To: YhLu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K8 D0 support

YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Opteron Rev D0 support done.
> 
> So I need to wait for AMD put the updated Bios porting guide including
> Opteron Rev D0 info. Only after that, I can commit the patch?
> Or ask the AMD to review the code?

Essentially.

It all depends on your relationship.  But as a general rule if you have
knowledge under an NDA that is not public knowledge it is impolite
to publish it with out the vendors approval.

This is courtesy, and in the case of AMD not a large imposition, as we
know the information will be publicly available in time.  Having the work
done
sooner and published would not hurt my feelings though.

Eric

___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: K8 D0 support

2004-12-04 Thread Eric W. Biederman
YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Opteron Rev D0 support done.
> 
> So I need to wait for AMD put the updated Bios porting guide including
> Opteron Rev D0 info. Only after that, I can commit the patch?
> Or ask the AMD to review the code?

Essentially.

It all depends on your relationship.  But as a general rule if you have
knowledge under an NDA that is not public knowledge it is impolite
to publish it with out the vendors approval.

This is courtesy, and in the case of AMD not a large imposition, as we
know the information will be publicly available in time.  Having the work done
sooner and published would not hurt my feelings though.

Eric
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


RE: K8 D0 support

2004-12-03 Thread YhLu
Opteron Rev D0 support done.

So I need to wait for AMD put the updated Bios porting guide including
Opteron Rev D0 info. Only after that, I can commit the patch?
Or ask the AMD to review the code?

Regards

YH

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 6:24 PM
To: YhLu
Cc: Stefan Reinauer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K8 D0 support

YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Eric,
> 
> Are you working on Opteron D0 support? There are some memory
initialization
> changes to support D0...

It is on the near term TODO list, as are way to many other
things.  I need to make certain I have some so I can test with them.
My impression the biggest change was the E0 stepping processors.

In any event until the information goes into the public datasheet
I can't publish anything.

Eric
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: K8 D0 support

2004-12-03 Thread Eric W. Biederman
YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Eric,
> 
> Are you working on Opteron D0 support? There are some memory initialization
> changes to support D0...

It is on the near term TODO list, as are way to many other
things.  I need to make certain I have some so I can test with them.
My impression the biggest change was the E0 stepping processors.

In any event until the information goes into the public datasheet
I can't publish anything.

Eric
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


K8 D0 support

2004-12-03 Thread YhLu
Eric,

Are you working on Opteron D0 support? There are some memory initialization
changes to support D0...

YH

___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios