Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Dave Ashley wrote:

 What disadvantages does SPD have other than it is more complex? Wouldn't it
 let you then be able to correctly use any DDR module you want?

some SPD roms have incorrect information. You have to take care with SPD. 

Overall, SPD is better. However, if you are on a short fuse and need to 
deliver soon, I would go with probing for now and restrict the type of ram 
you use. 

Longer term, we want to do SPD.

ron

___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030718 21:12]:
 On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Dave Ashley wrote:
 
  What disadvantages does SPD have other than it is more complex? Wouldn't it
  let you then be able to correctly use any DDR module you want?
 
 some SPD roms have incorrect information. You have to take care with SPD. 

Does this happen if you buy cheap ram, or ram of a certain type?
How can this kind of problem be avoided? I heard and read this a couple
of times now, but (I think) it never happened to me 'til now

Stefan

-- 
Architecture Team
SuSE Linux AG
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Stefan Reinauer wrote:

  some SPD roms have incorrect information. You have to take care with SPD. 
 
 Does this happen if you buy cheap ram, or ram of a certain type?

You need to find quality vendors and stick with them. Even then, you can 
get in trouble. 

 How can this kind of problem be avoided? I heard and read this a couple
 of times now, but (I think) it never happened to me 'til now

It can't as long as vendors mix up SEEPROM and DRAM parts incorrectly.

ron

___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread Dave Ashley
src/sdram/smbus_pcibus.inc has some smbus code, I was able to compile it
into the epia-m tree and do some test SMBUS_READ_BYTE calls that actually
read out values from the ddr eeprom. I had to #if out the section that
actually does the dram configuration to get it to compile.

I'm in a bad way for experimenting with this, I have to physically remove
the BIOS and plug in a new one if something goes bad, and do the reverse
to recover. I've fried 2 motherboards with my pliers rubbing out traces
under the flashrom socket (good luck fixing that!).

If the dram settings are wrong it might make the product flaky. We're
trying to field some units for in situ testing real soon, and the system
has to be solid. We can probably hardcode the dram configuration for our
known good ddr module that we're using mostly. However I'd like the system
to function the right way. I'll keep messing with it for now.

-Dave


some SPD roms have incorrect information. You have to take care with SPD. 

Overall, SPD is better. However, if you are on a short fuse and need to 
deliver soon, I would go with probing for now and restrict the type of ram 
you use. 

Longer term, we want to do SPD.

ron

___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#] [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Dave Ashley wrote:

 the BIOS and plug in a new one if something goes bad, and do the reverse
 to recover. I've fried 2 motherboards with my pliers rubbing out traces
 under the flashrom socket (good luck fixing that!).

you need to go to radioshack and get the flash part extractors. They are 
perfect for this. 

Also, failing that, put dental floss under the chip when you install and 
and then you can lift it out (thanks to Steve James for this one).

ron

___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread Bari Ari
Stefan Reinauer wrote:

* ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030718 21:12]:
 

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Dave Ashley wrote:

   

What disadvantages does SPD have other than it is more complex? Wouldn't it
let you then be able to correctly use any DDR module you want?
 

some SPD roms have incorrect information. You have to take care with SPD. 
   

Does this happen if you buy cheap ram, or ram of a certain type?
How can this kind of problem be avoided? I heard and read this a couple
of times now, but (I think) it never happened to me 'til now
SPD only works if the RAM vendor properly programs the serial EEPROM. 
RAM is a commodity item and vendors churn out millions of modules a 
year. An assembly line can build thousands of modules per day. If there 
is a hickup on the procurement side (parts not showing up or late  for 
assembly) an assembler may be forced to use a different part number that 
is in stock that is still compatible with the module pcb layout but does 
not have the same timing specs. Other times the SPD info is just 
programmed wrong and the only QC is based on the end user complaining 
about a problem. Another way that SPD breaks is by flaky software or SPD 
bus corruption that writes data to the SPD device on the RAM module. 
Don't be surprised by how much broken PC hardware gets sent off to 
market with fixes via BIOS and other still broken means.

-Bari

___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread Alex Scarbro


 On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:07:49 -0500, Bari Ari wrote:
 Stefan Reinauer wrote:
 
 * ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030718 21:12]:
 
 
 On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Dave Ashley wrote:
 
 
 
 What disadvantages does SPD have other than it is more complex? Wouldn't it
 let you then be able to correctly use any DDR module you want?
 
 
 some SPD roms have incorrect information. You have to take care with SPD.
 
 
 
 Does this happen if you buy cheap ram, or ram of a certain type?
 How can this kind of problem be avoided? I heard and read this a couple
 of times now, but (I think) it never happened to me 'til now
 
 SPD only works if the RAM vendor properly programs the serial EEPROM.
 RAM is a commodity item and vendors churn out millions of modules a
 year. An assembly line can build thousands of modules per day. If there
 is a hickup on the procurement side (parts not showing up or late  for
 assembly) an assembler may be forced to use a different part number that
 is in stock that is still compatible with the module pcb layout but does
 not have the same timing specs. Other times the SPD info is just
 programmed wrong and the only QC is based on the end user complaining
 about a problem. Another way that SPD breaks is by flaky software or SPD
 bus corruption that writes data to the SPD device on the RAM module.
 Don't be surprised by how much broken PC hardware gets sent off to
 market with fixes via BIOS and other still broken means.
 
 -Bari
 
 
 ___
 Linuxbios mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

  Hi there,
  I don;t know wether this is of any assistance in your problem, but i recently wrote an application to read and  re-program the Serial EEPROMs, used for SPD, to allow a 128Mb part to work in an old 64Mb application. Would this be of any help to anyone? Its a Labview (see www.ni.com) application and the programming was achieved through the PC parallel port.

  Cheers for now

  AS
 -- 
 Alex Scarbro, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 18/07/2003


___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: EPIA-M SPD progress [PMX:#]

2003-07-18 Thread Andrew Ip
Hi Dave,

 src/sdram/smbus_pcibus.inc has some smbus code, I was able to compile it
 into the epia-m tree and do some test SMBUS_READ_BYTE calls that actually
 read out values from the ddr eeprom. I had to #if out the section that
 actually does the dram configuration to get it to compile.
 I'm in a bad way for experimenting with this, I have to physically remove
 the BIOS and plug in a new one if something goes bad, and do the reverse
 to recover. I've fried 2 motherboards with my pliers rubbing out traces
 under the flashrom socket (good luck fixing that!).
BIOS Savior will save you.  :)

-Andrew

-- 
Andrew Ip
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel:(852) 2542 2046
Fax:(852) 2542 2036
Mobile: (852) 9201 9866

Cwlinux Limited
Unit 202B 2/F Lai Cheong Factory Building,
479-479A Castle Peak Road,
Lai Chi Kok, Kowloon,
Hong Kong.

Tel: (852)2542 2046
Fax: (852)2542 2036

For public pgp key, please obtain it from http://www.keyserver.net/en.
___
Linuxbios mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios