Question about mem parameter in the bootargs

2011-08-18 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
Hi,

Does someone knows what is the smallest step to increase the mem
parameter in the bootargs?

I am running linux in an embedded system where I have a very critical
memory constraint and  I would like to have mem=3584k instead mem=3M or
mem=4M.

The Linux boot up sucessfull with mem=3M or mem=4M but the kernel
crashes with mem=3584k.

thank you

Moratelli

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


sdhc/mpc8536 - SDCard always detected like read-only

2011-04-05 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
Hello,

I am working in a MPC8536e custom board. Our custom board has a slot to 
SDCards conected to the MPC8536e's eSDHC controller. We are using just
4-serial data pins of eSDHC controller.

My kernel is 2.6.35.7 and I am using buildroot to build the root system
with uClib.

I can mount and read the data from SDCards in the slot. But I am facing
errors when I try write something in the card. 

I am testing two SDcards: Kingston and a LG, both with 2GB capacity. I
tryed ext3 and fat32 filesystems with the same results.

When the card is detected the log is (observe the ro flag in the first
line):

mmcblk0: mmc0:57f7 SD02G 1.83 GiB (ro)
mmcblk0:
mmc0: starting CMD18 arg  flags 00b5
mmc0: blksz 512 blocks 8 flags 0200 tsac 100 ms nsac 0
mmc0: CMD12 arg  flags 049d
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x000a
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
mmc0: req done (CMD18): 0: 0900   
mmc0: 4096 bytes transferred: 0
mmc0: (CMD12): 0: 0b00   
p1

I am sure the write protection mechanism on SDCard is in the unlock
position, but the kernel drivers detects the card like read-only.

Has someone idea why this happen?

Every idea or tip is apreciated.

Regards,

Moratelli.

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: sdhc/mpc8536 - SDCard always detected like read-only

2011-04-05 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
Em Ter, 2011-04-05 às 21:02 +0200, Wolfram Sang escreveu:
> > Every idea or tip is apreciated.
> 
> Please post your dts.
> 

/*
 * MPC8536 DS Device Tree Source
 *
 * Copyright 2008-2009 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
 *
 * This program is free software; you can redistribute  it and/or modify
it
 * under  the terms of  the GNU General  Public License as published by
the
 * Free Software Foundation;  either version 2 of the  License, or (at
your
 * option) any later version.
 */

/dts-v1/;

/ {
model = "fsl,mpc8536ds";
compatible = "fsl,mpc8536ds";
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;

aliases {
ethernet0 = &enet0;
serial0 = &serial0;
serial1 = &serial1;
pci1 = &pci1;
};

cpus {
#cpus = <1>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

PowerPC,8536@0 {
device_type = "cpu";
reg = <0>;
next-level-cache = <&L2>;
};
};

memory {
device_type = "memory";
reg = <0 0 0 0>;// Filled by U-Boot
};

soc@fffe0 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
device_type = "soc";
compatible = "simple-bus";
ranges = <0x0 0xf 0xffe0 0x10>;
bus-frequency = <0>;// Filled out by uboot.

ecm-law@0 {
compatible = "fsl,ecm-law";
reg = <0x0 0x1000>;
fsl,num-laws = <12>;
};

ecm@1000 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-ecm", "fsl,ecm";
reg = <0x1000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <17 2>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
};

memory-controller@2000 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-memory-controller";
reg = <0x2000 0x1000>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
interrupts = <18 0x2>;
};

L2: l2-cache-controller@2 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-l2-cache-controller";
reg = <0x2 0x1000>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
interrupts = <16 0x2>;
};

i2c@3000 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
cell-index = <0>;
compatible = "fsl-i2c";
reg = <0x3000 0x100>;
interrupts = <43 0x2>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
dfsrr;

hwmon@48 {
compatible = "national,lm73";
reg = <0x49>;
};

rtc@68 {
compatible = "rtc-m41t80,m41t82";
reg = <0x68>;
};

lm90@4C {
compatible = "lm90,adt7461";
reg = <0x4C>;
};


};

i2c@3100 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
cell-index = <1>;
compatible = "fsl-i2c";
reg = <0x3100 0x100>;
interrupts = <43 0x2>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
dfsrr;

sfp@50 {
compatible = "sfp_teste,sfp_teste";
reg = <0x50>;
};

bcm56334@44{
compatible = "bcm56334,bcm56334";
reg = <0x44>;
};

};

spi@7000 {
cell-index = <0>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-espi";
reg = <0x7000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <59 0x2>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
fsl,espi-num-chipselects = <4>;
mode = "cpu";

};

dma@21300 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-dma", "fsl,eloplus-dma";
reg = <0x21300 4>;
  

Re: sdhc/mpc8536 - SDCard always detected like read-only

2011-04-06 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
I will try address the issue in details.

When I insert the SDCard, the same is detect like read-only:

mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 NCard 966 MiB (ro)
mmcblk0:
mmc0: starting CMD18 arg  flags 00b5
mmc0: blksz 512 blocks 8 flags 0200 tsac 100 ms nsac 0
mmc0: CMD12 arg  flags 049d
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x000a
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
mmc0: req done (CMD18): 0: 0900   
mmc0: 4096 bytes transferred: 0
mmc0: (CMD12): 0: 0b00   
p1

So, I just can mount the filesystem read-only. I can read the fat32
without problems.

I tested your sugestion. I used sdhci,wp-inverted in my dtb. This
changed the behavior. Now the SDCard is detected without the read-only
flag:

mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 NCard 966 MiB 
mmcblk0:
mmc0: starting CMD18 arg  flags 00b5
mmc0: blksz 512 blocks 8 flags 0200 tsac 100 ms nsac 0
mmc0: CMD12 arg  flags 049d
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x000a
sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
mmc0: req done (CMD18): 0: 0900   
mmc0: 4096 bytes transferred: 0
mmc0: (CMD12): 0: 0b00   
p1

And, I can mount a rw filesystem:

#mount  /dev/mmcblock1 /mnt
#cat /proc/mounts
...
/dev/mmcblock1 /mnt vfat
rw,relatime,fmask=,dmask=,allow_utime=0022,codepage=cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro
 0 0
...

So, I can copy files to the mounted SDCard. But, When I try to umount I
see the following error mensagens:

#cp /etc/shadow /mnt
#ls /mnt
shadow
#umount /mnt
mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 5944, nr 1, card status
0x900
end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 5944
mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 5936, nr 1, card status
0x900
end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 5936
Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk0p1, logical block 3888
mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 2049, nr 1, card status
0x900
end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 2049
Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk0p1, logical block 1
mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 2080, nr 1, card status
0x900
end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 2080
...

I think I need the sdhci,wp-inverted in my dtb. But, it appears that
more something is necessary.

Has someone faced this situation?

Thanks by the help until here.

Regards,

Moratelli



Em Qua, 2011-04-06 às 01:48 +0200, Wolfram Sang escreveu:
> > sdhci@2e000 {
> > compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-esdhc", "fsl,esdhc";
> > reg = <0x2e000 0x1000>;
> > interrupts = <72 0x2>;
> > interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
> > /* Filled in by U-Boot */
> > clock-frequency = <0>;
> > };
> 
> Hmm, I am not too familiar with those SoCs, yet some 83xx needed
> 
>   sdhci,wp-inverted;
> 
> here. Maybe yours, too? Would fit the symptoms.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Wolfram
> 


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: sdhc/mpc8536 - SDCard always detected like read-only - SOLVED.

2011-04-06 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
Wolfram,

Reading the MPC8536E Chip Errata I saw the SDHC_WP signal polarity is 
reversed to the silicon revision 1.0.

Unfortunately my prototype board  is using revision 1.0. So, I asked to
my hardware team workaround putting an extra inverter for the SDHC_WP
signal.

Now its working fine!

Thanks,

Moratelli



Em Qua, 2011-04-06 às 14:18 -0300, Carlos Roberto Moratelli escreveu:
> I will try address the issue in details.
> 
> When I insert the SDCard, the same is detect like read-only:
> 
> mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 NCard 966 MiB (ro)
> mmcblk0:
> mmc0: starting CMD18 arg  flags 00b5
> mmc0: blksz 512 blocks 8 flags 0200 tsac 100 ms nsac 0
> mmc0: CMD12 arg  flags 049d
> sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
> sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x000a
> sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
> mmc0: req done (CMD18): 0: 0900   
> mmc0: 4096 bytes transferred: 0
> mmc0: (CMD12): 0: 0b00   
> p1
> 
> So, I just can mount the filesystem read-only. I can read the fat32
> without problems.
> 
> I tested your sugestion. I used sdhci,wp-inverted in my dtb. This
> changed the behavior. Now the SDCard is detected without the read-only
> flag:
> 
> mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 NCard 966 MiB 
> mmcblk0:
> mmc0: starting CMD18 arg  flags 00b5
> mmc0: blksz 512 blocks 8 flags 0200 tsac 100 ms nsac 0
> mmc0: CMD12 arg  flags 049d
> sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
> sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x000a
> sdhci [sdhci_irq()]: *** mmc0 got interrupt: 0x0001
> mmc0: req done (CMD18): 0: 0900   
> mmc0: 4096 bytes transferred: 0
> mmc0: (CMD12): 0: 0b00   
> p1
> 
> And, I can mount a rw filesystem:
> 
> #mount  /dev/mmcblock1 /mnt
> #cat /proc/mounts
> ...
> /dev/mmcblock1 /mnt vfat
> rw,relatime,fmask=,dmask=,allow_utime=0022,codepage=cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro
>  0 0
> ...
> 
> So, I can copy files to the mounted SDCard. But, When I try to umount I
> see the following error mensagens:
> 
> #cp /etc/shadow /mnt
> #ls /mnt
> shadow
> #umount /mnt
> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
> mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 5944, nr 1, card status
> 0x900
> end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 5944
> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
> mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 5936, nr 1, card status
> 0x900
> end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 5936
> Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk0p1, logical block 3888
> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
> mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 2049, nr 1, card status
> 0x900
> end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 2049
> Buffer I/O error on device mmcblk0p1, logical block 1
> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
> mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 2080, nr 1, card status
> 0x900
> end_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 2080
> ...
> 
> I think I need the sdhci,wp-inverted in my dtb. But, it appears that
> more something is necessary.
> 
> Has someone faced this situation?
> 
> Thanks by the help until here.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Moratelli
> 
> 
> 
> Em Qua, 2011-04-06 às 01:48 +0200, Wolfram Sang escreveu:
> > >   sdhci@2e000 {
> > >   compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-esdhc", "fsl,esdhc";
> > >   reg = <0x2e000 0x1000>;
> > >   interrupts = <72 0x2>;
> > >   interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
> > >   /* Filled in by U-Boot */
> > >   clock-frequency = <0>;
> > >   };
> > 
> > Hmm, I am not too familiar with those SoCs, yet some 83xx needed
> > 
> > sdhci,wp-inverted;
> > 
> > here. Maybe yours, too? Would fit the symptoms.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >Wolfram
> > 
> 


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Doubt about Linux PCIe infraestructure

2010-09-28 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
Hi,

I have a simple doubt about linux PCI/PCIe infraestructure.  

When I register a PCI driver using pci_register_driver() will the 
probe function be automatically called or will it just be called if PCI 
infraestructure match a Vendor and Device id on bus?

I am loading a PCI driver that register itself using 
pci_register_driver() but the probe function isn't called.

thanks,

Carlos R. Moratelli

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


modprobe problem

2009-05-05 Thread Carlos Roberto Moratelli
Hello,

I have a Kernel 2.6.24 running on a custom board based on mpc8313erdb.
My filesystem is composed by a read-only squashfs and a read-write jffs2
filesystems. A unionfs is used to unificate the filesystems.

Like you know, when a file on my read-only squasfs is modified such file
is copied to read-write jffs2 partition by unionfs. So, when you try to
read such file again, the modified copy on jffs2 will be used.

The kernel modules (.ko) are on squashfs and I am using modprobe to load
the kernel modules. 

THE PROBLEM is when I try load a module using modprobe, this module is
copied from squashfs to jffs2 filesystem. But, my intention is not
modify the module, just load it. 

I am supposing that is a problem because the modules are using
duplicated space in flash and I don't want to store the modules in jffs2
because the compression is lower.

Does someone know why this happend?

Thanks,

Moratelli




 

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev