Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-09 Thread Jonathan Corbet 
On Tue,  4 Sep 2018 00:15:23 +0200
Henrik Austad  wrote:

> I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
> but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
> we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
> if we just want to delete them anyway.
> 
> As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
> see where the discussion is going.

Applied, thanks.

jon

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-07 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman 
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:39:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Steven Rostedt  wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:58:04 -0600
> > Jonathan Corbet  wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> jon  (who is increasingly inclined to apply this patch)
> >
> > As Colin Kaepernick now says... "Just do it!"
> >
> > ;-)
> 
> +1
> 
> But I'm biased, I'm part of the party that is responsible for the new
> shiny documentation system ...

I am not responsible for any of the new shiny documentation system, and
I think this is a good idea:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-06 Thread Daniel Vetter 
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Steven Rostedt  wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:58:04 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet  wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> jon  (who is increasingly inclined to apply this patch)
>
> As Colin Kaepernick now says... "Just do it!"
>
> ;-)

+1

But I'm biased, I'm part of the party that is responsible for the new
shiny documentation system ...
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-06 Thread Steven Rostedt 
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:58:04 -0600
Jonathan Corbet  wrote:

> Thanks,
> 
> jon  (who is increasingly inclined to apply this patch)

As Colin Kaepernick now says... "Just do it!"

;-)

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-06 Thread Jonathan Corbet 
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:59:08 -0400
Steven Rostedt  wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:30:30 +0200
> Pavel Machek  wrote:
> 
> > I'd say this is still quite valueable, and it might be worth fixing,
> > rather then removing completely.  
> 
> I agree. Perhaps we should have a 00-DESCRIPTION file in each
> directory, and each file could start with a:
> 
>  DESCRIPTION: 
> 
> and then these files could be generated by those that have these tags.

I really don't want to hack up yet another documentation syntax and
processing scheme.  We already have one that does all of this and more.
That energy would be far better spent bringing the docs into the RST
hierarchy, IMO.

Thanks,

jon  (who is increasingly inclined to apply this patch)

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-05 Thread Paul Moore 
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:15 PM Henrik Austad  wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
>
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
> in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
> usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
> the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
> a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
> anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)
>
> A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
> needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
> it is time to just throw them out.
>
> A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
> counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
> is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.
>
> List of outdated 00-INDEX:
> Documentation: (4/10)
> Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)
> Documentation/timers: (1/0)
> Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)
> Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)
> Documentation/locking: (0/1)
> Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)
> Documentation/power: (1/1)
> Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)
> Documentation/arm: (1/0)
> Documentation/x86: (0/9)
> Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)
> Documentation/scsi: (4/4)
> Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)
> Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)
> Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)
> Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)
> Documentation/spi: (1/0)
> Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)
> Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)
> Documentation/fb: (0/1)
> Documentation/block: (0/1)
> Documentation/networking: (6/37)
> Documentation/vm: (1/3)
>
> Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files that
> are missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no
> 00-INDEX).
>
> I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
> but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
> we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
> if we just want to delete them anyway.
>
> As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
> see where the discussion is going.
>
> Again, sorry for the insanely wide distribution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
...
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
> ---
>  Documentation/00-INDEX  | 428 
> 
...

Looks reasonable to me, you can add my ACK for the NetLabel bits.

Acked-by: Paul Moore 

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-04 Thread Mike Rapoport 
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:15:23AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
> 
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
> in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
> usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
> the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
> a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
> anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)
> 
> A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
> needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
> it is time to just throw them out.
> 
> A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
> counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
> is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.
> 
> List of outdated 00-INDEX:
> Documentation: (4/10)
> Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)
> Documentation/timers: (1/0)
> Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)
> Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)
> Documentation/locking: (0/1)
> Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)
> Documentation/power: (1/1)
> Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)
> Documentation/arm: (1/0)
> Documentation/x86: (0/9)
> Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)
> Documentation/scsi: (4/4)
> Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)
> Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)
> Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)
> Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)
> Documentation/spi: (1/0)
> Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)
> Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)
> Documentation/fb: (0/1)
> Documentation/block: (0/1)
> Documentation/networking: (6/37)
> Documentation/vm: (1/3)
> 
> Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files that
> are missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no
> 00-INDEX).
> 
> I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
> but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
> we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
> if we just want to delete them anyway.
> 
> As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
> see where the discussion is going.

For the Documentation/vm

Acked-by: Mike Rapoport 
 
> Again, sorry for the insanely wide distribution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas 
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
> Cc: Josh Triplett 
> Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers 
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan 
> Cc: Jens Axboe 
> Cc: Rob Herring 
> Cc: Mark Rutland 
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 
> Cc: Linus Walleij 
> Cc: "David S. Miller" 
> Cc: Karsten Keil 
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada 
> Cc: Michal Marek 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar 
> Cc: Will Deacon 
> Cc: Ralf Baechle 
> Cc: Paul Burton 
> Cc: James Hogan 
> Cc: Paul Moore 
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" 
> Cc: Helge Deller 
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
> Cc: Len Brown 
> Cc: Pavel Machek 
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> Cc: Paul Mackerras 
> Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
> Cc: Heiko Carstens 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
> Cc: Jiri Slaby 
> Cc: Mark Brown 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" 
> Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov 
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
> Cc: x...@kernel.org
> Cc: Henrik Austad 
> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> Cc: Ian Kent 
> Cc: Jacek Anaszewski 
> Cc: Mike Rapoport 
> Cc: Jan Kandziora 
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-m...@linux-mips.org
> Cc: linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-par...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
> ---
>  Documentation/00-INDEX  | 428 
> 
>  Documentation/PCI/00-INDEX  |  26 --
>  Documentation/RCU/00-INDEX  |  34 ---
>  Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt   |   4 -
>  Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst|   3 +-
>  Documentation/arm/00-INDEX  |  50 
>  Documentation/block/00-INDEX|  34 ---
>  Documentation/blockdev/00-INDEX |  18 --
>  Documentation/cdrom/00-INDEX|  11 -
>  Documentation/cgroup-v1/00-INDEX|  26 --
>  Documentation/devicetree/00-INDEX   |  12 -
>  Documentation/fb/00-INDEX   |  75 --
>  Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX  | 153 
>

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-04 Thread Jens Axboe 
On 9/3/18 4:15 PM, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
> 
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
> in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
> usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
> the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
> a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
> anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)
> 
> A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
> needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
> it is time to just throw them out.
> 
> A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
> counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
> is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.

For the block related bits:

Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe 

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-04 Thread Steven Rostedt 
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:30:30 +0200
Pavel Machek  wrote:

> I'd say this is still quite valueable, and it might be worth fixing,
> rather then removing completely.

I agree. Perhaps we should have a 00-DESCRIPTION file in each
directory, and each file could start with a:

 DESCRIPTION: 

and then these files could be generated by those that have these tags.

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-04 Thread Paul E. McKenney 
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:15:23AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.
> 
> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
> in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
> usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
> the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
> a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
> anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)
> 
> A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
> needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
> it is time to just throw them out.
> 
> A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
> counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
> is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.
> 
> List of outdated 00-INDEX:
> Documentation: (4/10)
> Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)
> Documentation/timers: (1/0)
> Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)
> Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)
> Documentation/locking: (0/1)
> Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)
> Documentation/power: (1/1)
> Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)
> Documentation/arm: (1/0)
> Documentation/x86: (0/9)
> Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)
> Documentation/scsi: (4/4)
> Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)
> Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)
> Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)
> Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)
> Documentation/spi: (1/0)
> Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)
> Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)
> Documentation/fb: (0/1)
> Documentation/block: (0/1)
> Documentation/networking: (6/37)
> Documentation/vm: (1/3)
> 
> Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files that
> are missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no
> 00-INDEX).
> 
> I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
> but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
> we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
> if we just want to delete them anyway.
> 
> As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
> see where the discussion is going.

For the RCU portions:

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney 

> Again, sorry for the insanely wide distribution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas 
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
> Cc: Josh Triplett 
> Cc: Steven Rostedt 
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers 
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan 
> Cc: Jens Axboe 
> Cc: Rob Herring 
> Cc: Mark Rutland 
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 
> Cc: Linus Walleij 
> Cc: "David S. Miller" 
> Cc: Karsten Keil 
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada 
> Cc: Michal Marek 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar 
> Cc: Will Deacon 
> Cc: Ralf Baechle 
> Cc: Paul Burton 
> Cc: James Hogan 
> Cc: Paul Moore 
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" 
> Cc: Helge Deller 
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
> Cc: Len Brown 
> Cc: Pavel Machek 
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> Cc: Paul Mackerras 
> Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
> Cc: Heiko Carstens 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
> Cc: Jiri Slaby 
> Cc: Mark Brown 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" 
> Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov 
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
> Cc: x...@kernel.org
> Cc: Henrik Austad 
> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> Cc: Ian Kent 
> Cc: Jacek Anaszewski 
> Cc: Mike Rapoport 
> Cc: Jan Kandziora 
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-m...@linux-mips.org
> Cc: linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-par...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
> ---
>  Documentation/00-INDEX  | 428 
> 
>  Documentation/PCI/00-INDEX  |  26 --
>  Documentation/RCU/00-INDEX  |  34 ---
>  Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt   |   4 -
>  Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst|   3 +-
>  Documentation/arm/00-INDEX  |  50 
>  Documentation/block/00-INDEX|  34 ---
>  Documentation/blockdev/00-INDEX |  18 --
>  Documentation/cdrom/00-INDEX|  11 -
>  Documentation/cgroup-v1/00-INDEX|  26 --
>  Documentation/devicetree/00-INDEX   |  12 -
>  Documentation/fb/00-INDEX   |  75 --
>  Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX  | 153 
>

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-04 Thread Pavel Machek 
Hi!

> The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
> in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
> usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
> the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
> a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise


> -SAK.txt
> - - info on Secure Attention Keys.
> -SM501.txt
> - - Silicon Motion SM501 multimedia companion chip
> -btmrvl.txt
> - - info on Marvell Bluetooth driver usage.

Well, I don't know what sm501 is, but description helps me. SAK is
similar. .. as is btmrvl.

I'd say this is still quite valueable, and it might be worth fixing,
rather then removing completely.

And yes, moving stuff to subdirectories and naming files reasonably
would help, too. "btmrvl" is really bad name...

Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-04 Thread Mark Brown 
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:15:23AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
> and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
> way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.

Acked-by: Mark Brown 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/

2018-09-03 Thread Henrik Austad 
This is a respin with a wider audience (all that get_maintainer returned)
and I know this spams a *lot* of people. Not sure what would be the correct
way, so my apologies for ruining your inbox.

The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present
in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their
usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal
the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as
a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise
anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers)

A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really
needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps
it is time to just throw them out.

A short status yields the following _outdated_ 00-INDEX files, first
counter is files listed in 00-INDEX but missing in the directory, last
is files present but not listed in 00-INDEX.

List of outdated 00-INDEX:
Documentation: (4/10)
Documentation/sysctl: (0/1)
Documentation/timers: (1/0)
Documentation/blockdev: (3/1)
Documentation/w1/slaves: (0/1)
Documentation/locking: (0/1)
Documentation/devicetree: (0/5)
Documentation/power: (1/1)
Documentation/powerpc: (0/5)
Documentation/arm: (1/0)
Documentation/x86: (0/9)
Documentation/x86/x86_64: (1/1)
Documentation/scsi: (4/4)
Documentation/filesystems: (2/9)
Documentation/filesystems/nfs: (0/2)
Documentation/cgroup-v1: (0/2)
Documentation/kbuild: (0/4)
Documentation/spi: (1/0)
Documentation/virtual/kvm: (1/0)
Documentation/scheduler: (0/2)
Documentation/fb: (0/1)
Documentation/block: (0/1)
Documentation/networking: (6/37)
Documentation/vm: (1/3)

Then there are 364 subdirectories in Documentation/ with several files that
are missing 00-INDEX alltogether (and another 120 with a single file and no
00-INDEX).

I don't really have an opinion to whether or not we /should/ have 00-INDEX,
but the above 00-INDEX should either be removed or be kept up to date. If
we should keep the files, I can try to keep them updated, but I rather not
if we just want to delete them anyway.

As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and
see where the discussion is going.

Again, sorry for the insanely wide distribution.

Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
Cc: Jonathan Corbet 
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas 
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" 
Cc: Josh Triplett 
Cc: Steven Rostedt 
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers 
Cc: Lai Jiangshan 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Cc: Rob Herring 
Cc: Mark Rutland 
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 
Cc: Linus Walleij 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Karsten Keil 
Cc: Masahiro Yamada 
Cc: Michal Marek 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Cc: Ingo Molnar 
Cc: Will Deacon 
Cc: Ralf Baechle 
Cc: Paul Burton 
Cc: James Hogan 
Cc: Paul Moore 
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" 
Cc: Helge Deller 
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" 
Cc: Len Brown 
Cc: Pavel Machek 
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
Cc: Paul Mackerras 
Cc: Michael Ellerman 
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky 
Cc: Heiko Carstens 
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman 
Cc: Jiri Slaby 
Cc: Mark Brown 
Cc: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Paolo Bonzini 
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" 
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov 
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" 
Cc: x...@kernel.org
Cc: Henrik Austad 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: Ian Kent 
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski 
Cc: Mike Rapoport 
Cc: Jan Kandziora 
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-m...@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-par...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad 
---
 Documentation/00-INDEX  | 428 
 Documentation/PCI/00-INDEX  |  26 --
 Documentation/RCU/00-INDEX  |  34 ---
 Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt   |   4 -
 Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst|   3 +-
 Documentation/arm/00-INDEX  |  50 
 Documentation/block/00-INDEX|  34 ---
 Documentation/blockdev/00-INDEX |  18 --
 Documentation/cdrom/00-INDEX|  11 -
 Documentation/cgroup-v1/00-INDEX|  26 --
 Documentation/devicetree/00-INDEX   |  12 -
 Documentation/fb/00-INDEX   |  75 --
 Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX  | 153 
 Documentation/filesystems/nfs/00-INDEX  |  26 --
 Documentation/fmc/00-INDEX  |  38 ---
 Documentation/gpio/00-INDEX |   4 -
 Documentation/ide/00-INDEX  |  14 --
 Documentation/ioctl/00-INDEX|  12 -
 Documentation/isdn/00-INDEX |  42 
 Documentation/kbuild/00-INDEX   |  14 --
 Documentation/laptops/00-INDEX  |  16 --
 Documentation/leds/00-INDEX