[PATCH] ASoC: claim the IRQ when the fsl_ssi device is probed, not opened

2011-08-16 Thread Timur Tabi
The PowerPC Freescale SSI driver is claiming the IRQ when the IRQ when
the device is opened, which means that the /proc/interrupts entry for
the SSI exists only during playback or capture.  This also meant that
the user won't know that the IRQ number is wrong until he tries to use
the device.  Instead, we should claim the IRQ when the device is probed.

Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com
---
 arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig |1 +
 arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig |1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig 
b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig
index fcd85d2..a3467bf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ CONFIG_SND=y
 CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0=y
 # CONFIG_SND_PPC is not set
 # CONFIG_SND_USB is not set
+CONFIG_SND_SOC=y
 CONFIG_HID_A4TECH=y
 CONFIG_HID_APPLE=y
 CONFIG_HID_BELKIN=y
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig 
b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
index 908c941..9693f6e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ CONFIG_SND=y
 CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0=y
 # CONFIG_SND_PPC is not set
 # CONFIG_SND_USB is not set
+CONFIG_SND_SOC=y
 CONFIG_HID_A4TECH=y
 CONFIG_HID_APPLE=y
 CONFIG_HID_BELKIN=y
-- 
1.7.4.4


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: [PATCH] ASoC: claim the IRQ when the fsl_ssi device is probed, not opened

2011-08-16 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
Timur Tabi wrote:
 The PowerPC Freescale SSI driver is claiming the IRQ when the IRQ when
 the device is opened, which means that the /proc/interrupts entry for
 the SSI exists only during playback or capture.  This also meant that
 the user won't know that the IRQ number is wrong until he tries to use
 the device.  Instead, we should claim the IRQ when the device is probed.

 Signed-off-by: Timur Tabiti...@freescale.com

Ugh, somehow I got my patches criss-crossed.  Ignore this, please.  I'll 
post a V2 in just a minute.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev