Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:15:32 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, > > microblaze, > > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say. > > That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers > included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually. Meh; it's been long enough. I'll build the major ones and then throw it into linux-next. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [ORLinux] [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
Acked-by: Jonas Bonn (for OpenRISC) On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 09:21 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Mark Brown > wrote: > > > Rather than requiring architectures that use gpiolib but don't have any > > need to define anything custom to copy an asm/gpio.h provide a Kconfig > > symbol which architectures must select in order to include gpio.h and > > for other architectures just provide the trivial implementation directly. > > > > This makes it much easier to do gpiolib updates and is also a step towards > > making gpiolib APIs available on every architecture. > > > > For architectures with existing boilerplate code leave a stub header in > > place which warns on direct inclusion of asm/gpio.h and includes > > linux/gpio.h to catch code that's doing this. Direct inclusion of > > asm/gpio.h has long been deprecated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > > --- > > arch/alpha/include/asm/gpio.h | 59 ++ > > arch/arm/Kconfig |1 + > > arch/avr32/Kconfig |1 + > > arch/blackfin/Kconfig |1 + > > arch/ia64/include/asm/gpio.h | 59 ++ > > arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu |1 + > > arch/microblaze/include/asm/gpio.h | 57 ++--- > > arch/mips/Kconfig |1 + > > arch/openrisc/include/asm/gpio.h | 69 > > ++- > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/gpio.h| 57 ++--- > > arch/sh/Kconfig|1 + > > arch/sparc/include/asm/gpio.h | 40 ++--- > > arch/unicore32/Kconfig |1 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/gpio.h| 57 ++--- > > arch/xtensa/include/asm/gpio.h | 60 ++- > > drivers/gpio/Kconfig |8 > > include/linux/gpio.h | 34 + > > 17 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 426 deletions(-) > > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze, > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > ___ > Linux mailing list > li...@lists.openrisc.net > http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/linux ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, >> microblaze, >> openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say. > > That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers > included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually. Oh I missed it. I looped in a few maintainers and arch lists anyway. Acked-by: Linus Walleij Thanks! Linus Walleij ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze, > openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say. That's why I CCed linux-arch, to get all the architecture maintainers included. vger would get upset if I CCed everyone individually. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH] gpiolib/arches: Centralise bolierplate asm/gpio.h
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > Rather than requiring architectures that use gpiolib but don't have any > need to define anything custom to copy an asm/gpio.h provide a Kconfig > symbol which architectures must select in order to include gpio.h and > for other architectures just provide the trivial implementation directly. > > This makes it much easier to do gpiolib updates and is also a step towards > making gpiolib APIs available on every architecture. > > For architectures with existing boilerplate code leave a stub header in > place which warns on direct inclusion of asm/gpio.h and includes > linux/gpio.h to catch code that's doing this. Direct inclusion of > asm/gpio.h has long been deprecated. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown > --- > arch/alpha/include/asm/gpio.h | 59 ++ > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/avr32/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/blackfin/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/ia64/include/asm/gpio.h | 59 ++ > arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu | 1 + > arch/microblaze/include/asm/gpio.h | 57 ++--- > arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/openrisc/include/asm/gpio.h | 69 ++- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/gpio.h | 57 ++--- > arch/sh/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/sparc/include/asm/gpio.h | 40 ++--- > arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/x86/include/asm/gpio.h | 57 ++--- > arch/xtensa/include/asm/gpio.h | 60 ++- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 8 > include/linux/gpio.h | 34 + > 17 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 426 deletions(-) This looks good but I think we need to page the alpha, ia64, m68k, microblaze, openrisc etc subarch maintainers on this patch so they have their say. Yours, Linus Walleij ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
