Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-11-10 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi Jason,

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:52 PM Jason Wessel  wrote:
>
> On 09/28/2018 07:57 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Christophe LEROY  writes:
> >> Le 27/09/2018 à 13:09, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> >>> Christophe LEROY  writes:
>  Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :
> 
>  The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork
>  (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715),
>  so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone
>  else takes the patch, no ?
> >>>
> >>> patchwork won't add the Fixes tag from the reply, it needs to be in the
> >>> original mail.
> >>>
> >>> See:
> >>> https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ok, so it accounts it and adds a '1' in the F column in the patches
> >> list, but won't take it into account.
> >
> > Yes. The logic that populates the columns is separate from the logic
> > that scrapes the tags, which is a bug :)
> >
> >> Then I'll send a v2 with revised commit text.
> >
>
>
> No need.  
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwessel/kgdb.git/commit/?h=kgdb-next
>
> Since it is a regression fix, we'll try and get it merged as soon as we can.

Looks like this didn't make it in yet, even with a merge window inbetween? :(

I know first-hand that time to do upstream work can sometimes be hard
to find. I also know that Daniel has shown interest in helping out
here, and is listed as a maintainer. May I suggest that he starts a
tree to collect patches and submit pull requests for a while, until
you find more time for it?

Having a tag-team maintainer setup like we have had for arm-soc has
been very useful especially when one of us get too busy for a while,
etc.


-Olof


Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-10-01 Thread Jason Wessel

On 09/28/2018 07:57 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:

Christophe LEROY  writes:

Le 27/09/2018 à 13:09, Michael Ellerman a écrit :

Christophe LEROY  writes:

Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :

The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715),
so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone
else takes the patch, no ?


patchwork won't add the Fixes tag from the reply, it needs to be in the
original mail.

See:
https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151



Ok, so it accounts it and adds a '1' in the F column in the patches
list, but won't take it into account.


Yes. The logic that populates the columns is separate from the logic
that scrapes the tags, which is a bug :)


Then I'll send a v2 with revised commit text.





No need.  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwessel/kgdb.git/commit/?h=kgdb-next

Since it is a regression fix, we'll try and get it merged as soon as we can.

Cheers,
Jason.


Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-28 Thread Michael Ellerman
Christophe LEROY  writes:
> Le 27/09/2018 à 13:09, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
>> Christophe LEROY  writes:
>>> Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :
 On 16/09/2018 20:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:
>> Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
>> ...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
>> Cc:  # 4.15+
>
> Would a Fixes: be better here?
> Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")

 Christophe, When you add the Fixes: could you also add my

 Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson 
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for the review, but do I have to do anything really ?
>>>
>>> The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork
>>> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715),
>>> so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone
>>> else takes the patch, no ?
>> 
>> patchwork won't add the Fixes tag from the reply, it needs to be in the
>> original mail.
>> 
>> See:
>>https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151
>> 
>
> Ok, so it accounts it and adds a '1' in the F column in the patches 
> list, but won't take it into account.

Yes. The logic that populates the columns is separate from the logic
that scrapes the tags, which is a bug :)

> Then I'll send a v2 with revised commit text.

Thanks.

cheers


Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-27 Thread Christophe LEROY




Le 27/09/2018 à 13:09, Michael Ellerman a écrit :

Christophe LEROY  writes:

Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :

On 16/09/2018 20:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:

On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:
Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry

...


Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
Cc:  # 4.15+


Would a Fixes: be better here?
Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")


Christophe, When you add the Fixes: could you also add my

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson 


Ok, thanks for the review, but do I have to do anything really ?

The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715),
so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone
else takes the patch, no ?


patchwork won't add the Fixes tag from the reply, it needs to be in the
original mail.

See:
   https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151



Ok, so it accounts it and adds a '1' in the F column in the patches 
list, but won't take it into account.


Then I'll send a v2 with revised commit text.

Christophe


Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-27 Thread Michael Ellerman
Christophe LEROY  writes:
> Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :
>> On 16/09/2018 20:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
 On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:
 Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
...

 Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
 Cc:  # 4.15+
>>>
>>> Would a Fixes: be better here?
>>> Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
>> 
>> Christophe, When you add the Fixes: could you also add my
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson 
>
> Ok, thanks for the review, but do I have to do anything really ?
>
> The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork 
> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715), 
> so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone 
> else takes the patch, no ?

patchwork won't add the Fixes tag from the reply, it needs to be in the
original mail.

See:
  https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151


cheers


Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-26 Thread Christophe LEROY




Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :

On 16/09/2018 20:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:

On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:

Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
kdb> btc
btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
Available cpus: 0
kdb_getarea: Bad address 0x0

when booting the kernel with 'debug_boot_weak_hash', it fails as well

Entering kdb (current=0xba99ad80, pid 284) due to Keyboard Entry
kdb> btc
btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
Available cpus: 0
kdb_getarea: Bad address 0xba99ad80

On other platforms, Oopses have been observed too, see
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/issues/139

This is due to btc calling 'btt' with %p pointer as an argument.

This patch replaces %p by %px to get the real pointer value as
expected by 'btt'

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
Cc:  # 4.15+


Would a Fixes: be better here?
Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")


Christophe, When you add the Fixes: could you also add my

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson 



Ok, thanks for the review, but do I have to do anything really ?

The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork 
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715), 
so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone 
else takes the patch, no ?


Christophe




Thanks.




No blame attached to Tobin, but the fixes makes it super clear what
changed and why this breaks kdb (which was not explicitly called out
the patch description).


Daniel.


---
  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
index 6ad4a9fcbd6f..7921ae4fca8d 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
@@ -179,14 +179,14 @@ kdb_bt(int argc, const char **argv)
  kdb_printf("no process for cpu %ld\n", cpu);
  return 0;
  }
-    sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
+    sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
  kdb_parse(buf);
  return 0;
  }
  kdb_printf("btc: cpu status: ");
  kdb_parse("cpu\n");
  for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-    sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
+    sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
  kdb_parse(buf);
  touch_nmi_watchdog();
  }
--
2.13.3



Re: Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-26 Thread Daniel Thompson

On 16/09/2018 20:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:

On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:

Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
kdb> btc
btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
Available cpus: 0
kdb_getarea: Bad address 0x0

when booting the kernel with 'debug_boot_weak_hash', it fails as well

Entering kdb (current=0xba99ad80, pid 284) due to Keyboard Entry
kdb> btc
btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
Available cpus: 0
kdb_getarea: Bad address 0xba99ad80

On other platforms, Oopses have been observed too, see
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/issues/139

This is due to btc calling 'btt' with %p pointer as an argument.

This patch replaces %p by %px to get the real pointer value as
expected by 'btt'

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
Cc:  # 4.15+


Would a Fixes: be better here?
Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")


Christophe, When you add the Fixes: could you also add my

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson 


Thanks.




No blame attached to Tobin, but the fixes makes it super clear what
changed and why this breaks kdb (which was not explicitly called out
the patch description).


Daniel.


---
  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
index 6ad4a9fcbd6f..7921ae4fca8d 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
@@ -179,14 +179,14 @@ kdb_bt(int argc, const char **argv)
kdb_printf("no process for cpu %ld\n", cpu);
return 0;
}
-   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
+   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
kdb_parse(buf);
return 0;
}
kdb_printf("btc: cpu status: ");
kdb_parse("cpu\n");
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
+   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
kdb_parse(buf);
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
--
2.13.3





Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-16 Thread Tobin C. Harding
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:06:10PM -0700, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:
> > 
> > Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
> > kdb> btc
> > btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
> > Available cpus: 0
> > kdb_getarea: Bad address 0x0
> > 
> > when booting the kernel with 'debug_boot_weak_hash', it fails as well
> > 
> > Entering kdb (current=0xba99ad80, pid 284) due to Keyboard Entry
> > kdb> btc
> > btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
> > Available cpus: 0
> > kdb_getarea: Bad address 0xba99ad80
> > 
> > On other platforms, Oopses have been observed too, see
> > https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/issues/139
> > 
> > This is due to btc calling 'btt' with %p pointer as an argument.
> > 
> > This patch replaces %p by %px to get the real pointer value as
> > expected by 'btt'
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
> > Cc:  # 4.15+
> 
> Would a Fixes: be better here?
> Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> 
> No blame attached to Tobin, but the fixes makes it super clear what

:)

> changed and why this breaks kdb (which was not explicitly called out
> the patch description).
> 
> 
> Daniel.


Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-16 Thread Daniel Thompson
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:
> 
> Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
> kdb> btc
> btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
> Available cpus: 0
> kdb_getarea: Bad address 0x0
> 
> when booting the kernel with 'debug_boot_weak_hash', it fails as well
> 
> Entering kdb (current=0xba99ad80, pid 284) due to Keyboard Entry
> kdb> btc
> btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
> Available cpus: 0
> kdb_getarea: Bad address 0xba99ad80
> 
> On other platforms, Oopses have been observed too, see
> https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/issues/139
> 
> This is due to btc calling 'btt' with %p pointer as an argument.
> 
> This patch replaces %p by %px to get the real pointer value as
> expected by 'btt'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
> Cc:  # 4.15+

Would a Fixes: be better here?
Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")

No blame attached to Tobin, but the fixes makes it super clear what
changed and why this breaks kdb (which was not explicitly called out
the patch description).


Daniel.

> ---
>  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
> index 6ad4a9fcbd6f..7921ae4fca8d 100644
> --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
> +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
> @@ -179,14 +179,14 @@ kdb_bt(int argc, const char **argv)
>   kdb_printf("no process for cpu %ld\n", cpu);
>   return 0;
>   }
> - sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
> + sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
>   kdb_parse(buf);
>   return 0;
>   }
>   kdb_printf("btc: cpu status: ");
>   kdb_parse("cpu\n");
>   for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> - sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
> + sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
>   kdb_parse(buf);
>   touch_nmi_watchdog();
>   }
> -- 
> 2.13.3
> 


[PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

2018-09-14 Thread Christophe Leroy
On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:

Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
kdb> btc
btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
Available cpus: 0
kdb_getarea: Bad address 0x0

when booting the kernel with 'debug_boot_weak_hash', it fails as well

Entering kdb (current=0xba99ad80, pid 284) due to Keyboard Entry
kdb> btc
btc: cpu status: Currently on cpu 0
Available cpus: 0
kdb_getarea: Bad address 0xba99ad80

On other platforms, Oopses have been observed too, see
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/issues/139

This is due to btc calling 'btt' with %p pointer as an argument.

This patch replaces %p by %px to get the real pointer value as
expected by 'btt'

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
Cc:  # 4.15+
---
 kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
index 6ad4a9fcbd6f..7921ae4fca8d 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c
@@ -179,14 +179,14 @@ kdb_bt(int argc, const char **argv)
kdb_printf("no process for cpu %ld\n", cpu);
return 0;
}
-   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
+   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
kdb_parse(buf);
return 0;
}
kdb_printf("btc: cpu status: ");
kdb_parse("cpu\n");
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
-   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%p\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
+   sprintf(buf, "btt 0x%px\n", KDB_TSK(cpu));
kdb_parse(buf);
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
-- 
2.13.3