Re: [PATCH] powerpc/32: Remove __main()
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:22:51 + (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote: > Comment says that __main() is there to make GCC happy. > > It's been there since the implementation of ppc arch in Linux 1.3.45. > > ppc32 is the only architecture having that. Even ppc64 doesn't have it. > > Seems like GCC is still happy without it. > > [...] Applied to powerpc/next. [1/1] powerpc/32: Remove __main() https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/4696cfdb1380238dca2bda6199428d7e50c4ea38 cheers
Re: [PATCH] powerpc/32: Remove __main()
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:22:51PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Comment says that __main() is there to make GCC happy. > > It's been there since the implementation of ppc arch in Linux 1.3.45. > > ppc32 is the only architecture having that. Even ppc64 doesn't have it. > > Seems like GCC is still happy without it. > > Drop it for good. If you used G++ to build the kernel there could be a call to __main inserted under some circumstances. It is used in functions called "main" if there is no other way to do initialisations (this should not happen if you use -ffreestanding, and there should not be a function called "main" anyway, but who knows). Either way, yup, this is ancient history :-) Segher
[PATCH] powerpc/32: Remove __main()
Comment says that __main() is there to make GCC happy. It's been there since the implementation of ppc arch in Linux 1.3.45. ppc32 is the only architecture having that. Even ppc64 doesn't have it. Seems like GCC is still happy without it. Drop it for good. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy --- arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S index 6a076bef2932..39ab15419592 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S @@ -388,9 +388,3 @@ _GLOBAL(start_secondary_resume) bl start_secondary b . #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ - -/* - * This routine is just here to keep GCC happy - sigh... - */ -_GLOBAL(__main) - blr -- 2.25.0
