[PATCH] serial: cpm_uart: call cpm_muram_init before registering console

2020-02-13 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
Christophe reports that powerpc 8xx silently fails to 5.6-rc1. It turns
out I was wrong about nobody relying on the lazy initialization of the
cpm/qe muram in commit b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy
call of cpm_muram_init()).

Rather than reinstating the somewhat dubious lazy call (initializing a
currently held spinlock, and implicitly doing a GFP_KERNEL under that
spinlock), make sure that cpm_muram_init() is called early enough - I
thought the calls from the subsys_initcalls were good enough, but when
used by console drivers, that's obviously not the
case. cpm_muram_init() is safe to call twice (there's an early return
if it is already initialized), so keep the call from cpm_init() - in
case SERIAL_CPM_CONSOLE=n.

Reported-by: Christophe Leroy 
Fixes: b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy call of cpm_muram_init())
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes 
---

Christophe, can I get you to add a formal Tested-by?

I'm not sure which tree this should go through.

 drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c 
b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
index 19d5a4cf29a6..d4b81b06e0cb 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
@@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static struct console cpm_scc_uart_console = {
 
 static int __init cpm_uart_console_init(void)
 {
+   cpm_muram_init();
register_console(&cpm_scc_uart_console);
return 0;
 }
-- 
2.23.0



Re: [PATCH] serial: cpm_uart: call cpm_muram_init before registering console

2020-02-13 Thread Christophe Leroy




Le 13/02/2020 à 12:43, Rasmus Villemoes a écrit :

Christophe reports that powerpc 8xx silently fails to 5.6-rc1. It turns
out I was wrong about nobody relying on the lazy initialization of the
cpm/qe muram in commit b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy
call of cpm_muram_init()).

Rather than reinstating the somewhat dubious lazy call (initializing a
currently held spinlock, and implicitly doing a GFP_KERNEL under that
spinlock), make sure that cpm_muram_init() is called early enough - I
thought the calls from the subsys_initcalls were good enough, but when
used by console drivers, that's obviously not the
case. cpm_muram_init() is safe to call twice (there's an early return
if it is already initialized), so keep the call from cpm_init() - in
case SERIAL_CPM_CONSOLE=n.

Reported-by: Christophe Leroy 
Fixes: b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy call of cpm_muram_init())
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes 


Tested-by: Christophe Leroy 


---

Christophe, can I get you to add a formal Tested-by?

I'm not sure which tree this should go through.

  drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c 
b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
index 19d5a4cf29a6..d4b81b06e0cb 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
@@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static struct console cpm_scc_uart_console = {
  
  static int __init cpm_uart_console_init(void)

  {
+   cpm_muram_init();
register_console(&cpm_scc_uart_console);
return 0;
  }



Re: [PATCH] serial: cpm_uart: call cpm_muram_init before registering console

2020-02-13 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:43:42PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Christophe reports that powerpc 8xx silently fails to 5.6-rc1. It turns
> out I was wrong about nobody relying on the lazy initialization of the
> cpm/qe muram in commit b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy
> call of cpm_muram_init()).
> 
> Rather than reinstating the somewhat dubious lazy call (initializing a
> currently held spinlock, and implicitly doing a GFP_KERNEL under that
> spinlock), make sure that cpm_muram_init() is called early enough - I
> thought the calls from the subsys_initcalls were good enough, but when
> used by console drivers, that's obviously not the
> case. cpm_muram_init() is safe to call twice (there's an early return
> if it is already initialized), so keep the call from cpm_init() - in
> case SERIAL_CPM_CONSOLE=n.
> 
> Reported-by: Christophe Leroy 
> Fixes: b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy call of cpm_muram_init())
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes 
> ---
> 
> Christophe, can I get you to add a formal Tested-by?
> 
> I'm not sure which tree this should go through.

I can take it, thanks.

greg k-h


RE: [PATCH] serial: cpm_uart: call cpm_muram_init before registering console

2020-02-13 Thread Leo Li



> -Original Message-
> From: Rasmus Villemoes 
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 5:44 AM
> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman ; Jiri Slaby
> ; Timur Tabi ; Leo Li
> ; Rasmus Villemoes 
> Cc: Qiang Zhao ; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Scott
> Wood ; Christophe Leroy ;
> linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] serial: cpm_uart: call cpm_muram_init before registering
> console
> 
> Christophe reports that powerpc 8xx silently fails to 5.6-rc1. It turns out I 
> was
> wrong about nobody relying on the lazy initialization of the cpm/qe muram in
> commit b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy call of
> cpm_muram_init()).
> 
> Rather than reinstating the somewhat dubious lazy call (initializing a 
> currently
> held spinlock, and implicitly doing a GFP_KERNEL under that spinlock), make
> sure that cpm_muram_init() is called early enough - I thought the calls from
> the subsys_initcalls were good enough, but when used by console drivers,
> that's obviously not the case. cpm_muram_init() is safe to call twice (there's
> an early return if it is already initialized), so keep the call from 
> cpm_init() - in
> case SERIAL_CPM_CONSOLE=n.
> 
> Reported-by: Christophe Leroy 
> Fixes: b6231ea2b3c6 (soc: fsl: qe: drop broken lazy call of cpm_muram_init())
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes 

Acked-by: Li Yang 

> ---
> 
> Christophe, can I get you to add a formal Tested-by?
> 
> I'm not sure which tree this should go through.
> 
>  drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
> b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
> index 19d5a4cf29a6..d4b81b06e0cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
> @@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static struct console cpm_scc_uart_console = {
> 
>  static int __init cpm_uart_console_init(void)  {
> + cpm_muram_init();
>   register_console(&cpm_scc_uart_console);
>   return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.23.0