Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 04:49:48PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Ok, I think it's finally ready to go. Acked-by: David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au -- David Gibson| I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:01:57PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 15:50 +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:11:11PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: [snip] On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:09:48PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..f2a7a39 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; You should probably document the alignment constraint on the address here, too. Alignment constraints will be learnt by the user-space during runtime. We provide that as part of 'struct ppc_debug_info' in 'data_bp_alignment' field. While the alignment is always 8-bytes for BookS, I think userspace should be left to learn it through PTRACE_PPC_GETHWDEBUGINFO. Right. In particular, BookE doesn't have alignment constraints. Okay. + attr.bp_len = len; + ret = modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, attr); + if (ret) { + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return ret; + } If a bp already exists, you're modifying it. I thought the semantics of the new interface meant that you shoul return ENOSPC in this case, and a DEL would be necessary before adding another breakpoint. I'm not too sure what would be the desired behaviour for this interface, either way is fine with me. I'd like to hear from the GDB folks (copied in this email) to know what would please them. ENOSPC should be returned. The interface doesn't have provisions for modifying breakpoints. The client should delete/create instead of trying to modify. Since PTRACE_PPC_GETHWDEBUGINFO returns the number of available breakpoint registers, the client shouldn't (and GDB doesn't) try to set more breakpoints than possible. Okay, I will modify the code accordingly. @@ -1426,10 +1488,24 @@ static long ppc_del_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, long addr, long data) #else if (data != 1) return -EINVAL; + +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; + + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (bp) { + unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp); + thread-ptrace_bps[0] = NULL; + } + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return 0; Shouldn't DEL return an error if there is no existing bp. Same comment as above. We'd like to know what behaviour would help the GDB use this interface better as there's no right or wrong way here. GDB expects DEL to return ENOENT is there's no existing bp. Fine, here too. We'll return a -ENOENT here. Thanks for your comments. -- K.Prasad ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
[PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt | 16 arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 77 +++--- 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..f2a7a39 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; + 3. PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG Takes an integer which identifies an existing breakpoint or watchpoint diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 05b7dd2..cd41c78 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1339,6 +1339,12 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_struct *child, static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + int ret, len = 0; + struct thread_struct *thread = (child-thread); + struct perf_event *bp; + struct perf_event_attr attr; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS unsigned long dabr; #endif @@ -1382,13 +1388,9 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, */ if ((bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) == 0 || (bp_info-trigger_type ~PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) != 0 || - bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT || bp_info-condition_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE) return -EINVAL; - if (child-thread.dabr) - return -ENOSPC; - if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15 +1400,63 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, dabr |= DABR_DATA_READ; if (bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE; +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; - child-thread.dabr = dabr; + /* +* Check if the request is for 'range' breakpoints. We can +* support it if range 8 bytes. +*/ + if (bp_info-addr_mode == PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE) { + len = bp_info-addr2 - bp_info-addr; + } else if (bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT) { + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return -EINVAL; + } + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (bp) { + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return -ENOSPC; + } + + /* Create a new breakpoint request if one doesn't exist already */ + hw_breakpoint_init(attr); + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info-addr ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; + attr.bp_len = len; + arch_bp_generic_fields(dabr (DABR_DATA_WRITE | DABR_DATA_READ), + attr.bp_type); + + thread-ptrace_bps[0] = bp = register_user_hw_breakpoint(attr, + ptrace_triggered, NULL, child); + if (IS_ERR(bp)) { + thread-ptrace_bps[0] = NULL; + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return PTR_ERR(bp); + } + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return 1; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ + + if (bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT) + return -EINVAL; + + if (child-thread.dabr) + return -ENOSPC; + + child-thread.dabr = dabr; return 1; #endif /* !CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_DVCS */ }
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 15:50 +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:11:11PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: [snip] On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:09:48PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..f2a7a39 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; You should probably document the alignment constraint on the address here, too. Alignment constraints will be learnt by the user-space during runtime. We provide that as part of 'struct ppc_debug_info' in 'data_bp_alignment' field. While the alignment is always 8-bytes for BookS, I think userspace should be left to learn it through PTRACE_PPC_GETHWDEBUGINFO. Right. In particular, BookE doesn't have alignment constraints. + attr.bp_len = len; + ret = modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, attr); + if (ret) { + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return ret; + } If a bp already exists, you're modifying it. I thought the semantics of the new interface meant that you shoul return ENOSPC in this case, and a DEL would be necessary before adding another breakpoint. I'm not too sure what would be the desired behaviour for this interface, either way is fine with me. I'd like to hear from the GDB folks (copied in this email) to know what would please them. ENOSPC should be returned. The interface doesn't have provisions for modifying breakpoints. The client should delete/create instead of trying to modify. Since PTRACE_PPC_GETHWDEBUGINFO returns the number of available breakpoint registers, the client shouldn't (and GDB doesn't) try to set more breakpoints than possible. @@ -1426,10 +1488,24 @@ static long ppc_del_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, long addr, long data) #else if (data != 1) return -EINVAL; + +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; + + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (bp) { + unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp); + thread-ptrace_bps[0] = NULL; + } + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return 0; Shouldn't DEL return an error if there is no existing bp. Same comment as above. We'd like to know what behaviour would help the GDB use this interface better as there's no right or wrong way here. GDB expects DEL to return ENOENT is there's no existing bp. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:11:11PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: [snip] On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:09:48PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: + if (bp) { + attr = bp-attr; + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info-addr ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; + arch_bp_generic_fields(dabr + (DABR_DATA_WRITE | DABR_DATA_READ), + attr.bp_type); + attr.bp_len = len; If gdb is using the new breakpoint interface, surely it should just use it, rather than doing this bit frobbing as in the old SET_DABR call. I understand that you wanted to avoid this duplication of effort in terms of encoding and decoding the breakpoint type from PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ to DABR_DATA_READ to HW_BREAKPOINT_R. However HW_BREAKPOINT_R is a generic definition used across architectures, DABR_DATA_READ is used in the !CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT case while PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ is used in CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS case. While we could define PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ and DABR_DATA_READ to the same value it may not result in any code savings (since the bit translation is done for !CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT case anyway). So, I think it is best left the way it is. That's not what I'm suggesting. What I'm saying is that ig userspace is using the new generic interface, then it should just set the bp_type field, and it should not use the DABR_DATA_{READ,WRITE} bits. The DABR_DATA bits should *only* be processed in the legacy interface, never in the generic interface. The DABR_DATA_{READ,WRITE} bits are neither set by the user, nor expected by the hw-breakpoint interface. It is an intermediate code used to re-use the arch_bp_generic_fields function. We could convert directly from PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ to HW_BREAKPOINT_R (using a switch-case) but that may not result in any code savings. DABR_DATA_{READ,WRITE} is indeed legacy and cannot be set by user-space for a PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG + CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT combination. [snipped] diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..f2a7a39 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; You should probably document the alignment constraint on the address here, too. Alignment constraints will be learnt by the user-space during runtime. We provide that as part of 'struct ppc_debug_info' in 'data_bp_alignment' field. While the alignment is always 8-bytes for BookS, I think userspace should be left to learn it through PTRACE_PPC_GETHWDEBUGINFO. + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; + 3. PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG Takes an integer which identifies an existing breakpoint or watchpoint diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 05b7dd2..be5dc57 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1339,6 +1339,12 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_struct *child, static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + int ret, len = 0; + struct thread_struct *thread = (child-thread); + struct perf_event *bp; + struct perf_event_attr attr; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS unsigned long dabr; #endif @@ -1382,13 +1388,9 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, */ if ((bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) == 0 || (bp_info-trigger_type ~PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) != 0 || - bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT || bp_info-condition_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE) return -EINVAL; - if (child-thread.dabr) - return -ENOSPC; - if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15 +1400,75 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, dabr |= DABR_DATA_READ; if (bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE; +#ifdef
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
[snip] On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:09:48PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: + if (bp) { + attr = bp-attr; + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info-addr ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; + arch_bp_generic_fields(dabr + (DABR_DATA_WRITE | DABR_DATA_READ), + attr.bp_type); + attr.bp_len = len; If gdb is using the new breakpoint interface, surely it should just use it, rather than doing this bit frobbing as in the old SET_DABR call. I understand that you wanted to avoid this duplication of effort in terms of encoding and decoding the breakpoint type from PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ to DABR_DATA_READ to HW_BREAKPOINT_R. However HW_BREAKPOINT_R is a generic definition used across architectures, DABR_DATA_READ is used in the !CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT case while PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ is used in CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS case. While we could define PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ and DABR_DATA_READ to the same value it may not result in any code savings (since the bit translation is done for !CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT case anyway). So, I think it is best left the way it is. That's not what I'm suggesting. What I'm saying is that ig userspace is using the new generic interface, then it should just set the bp_type field, and it should not use the DABR_DATA_{READ,WRITE} bits. The DABR_DATA bits should *only* be processed in the legacy interface, never in the generic interface. I'm attaching the revised patch (after incorporating your comments). Kindly let me know your comments. Thanks, K.Prasad - [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). Tested-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado emach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt | 16 +++ arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 88 +++--- 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..f2a7a39 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; You should probably document the alignment constraint on the address here, too. + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; + 3. PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG Takes an integer which identifies an existing breakpoint or watchpoint diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 05b7dd2..be5dc57 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1339,6 +1339,12 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_struct *child, static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + int ret, len = 0; + struct thread_struct *thread = (child-thread); + struct perf_event *bp; + struct perf_event_attr attr; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS unsigned long dabr; #endif @@ -1382,13 +1388,9 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, */ if ((bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) == 0 || (bp_info-trigger_type ~PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) != 0 || - bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT || bp_info-condition_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE) return -EINVAL; - if (child-thread.dabr) - return -ENOSPC; - if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:33:59PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:57:10PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 03:05:52PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:59:39PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:55:13PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:08:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:21:36PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: [snipped] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. Above pargraph needs revision. Sure, done. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). [Edjunior: Identified an issue in the patch with the sanity check for version numbers] Tested-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado emach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..04656ec 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_EXACT; MODE_RANGE_EXACT? Shouldn't that just be MODE_EXACT? That was silly. Thanks for pointing it out. + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; + 3. PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG Takes an integer which identifies an existing breakpoint or watchpoint diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 05b7dd2..2449495 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1339,6 +1339,12 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_struct *child, static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + int ret, len = 0; + struct thread_struct *thread = (child-thread); + struct perf_event *bp; + struct perf_event_attr attr; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS unsigned long dabr; #endif @@ -1382,13 +1388,9 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, */ if ((bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) == 0 || (bp_info-trigger_type ~PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) != 0 || - bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT || bp_info-condition_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE) return -EINVAL; - if (child-thread.dabr) - return -ENOSPC; - if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15 +1400,83 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, dabr |= DABR_DATA_READ; if (bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE; +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; - child-thread.dabr = dabr; + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (!bp_info-addr) { I think this is treating a hardware breakpoint at address 0 as if it didn't exist. That seems wrong. Yes, I think the above the condition need not exist after we've agreed that 0 is a valid address to set breakpoint upon. One needs to use PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG to delete a breakpoint and not by writing 0 (as done with PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG). I'll remove that. + if (bp) { + unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp); + thread-ptrace_bps[0] = NULL; + } +
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:57:10PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 03:05:52PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:59:39PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:55:13PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:08:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:21:36PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. So, the structure itself doesn't seem to have been extended. I don't understand what the semantic difference is - your patch comment needs to explain this clearly. We had a request to extend the structure but thought it was dangerous to do so. For instance if the user-space used version1 of the structure, while kernel did a copy_to_user() pertaining to version2, then we'd run into problems. Unfortunately the ptrace flags weren't designed to accept a version number as input from the user through the PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO flag (which would have solved this issue). I still don't follow you. Two things here. One, the change of semantics warranted an increment of the version number. The new semantics accepts PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE on BookS, while the old version number did not. I've added a small comment in the code to this effect. Two, regarding changes in the ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info structures - we would like to add more members to it if we can (GDB has a pending request to add more members to it). However the problem foreseen is that there could be a mismatch between the versions of the structure used by the user vs kernel-space i.e. if a new version of the structure, known to the kernel, had an extra member while the user-space still had the old version, then it becomes dangerous because the __copy_to_user function would overflow the buffer size in user-space. This could have been avoided if PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO was originally designed to accept a version number (and provide corresponding struct ppc_debug_info) rather than send a populated ppc_debug_info structure along with the version number. Based on further discussions with the code-reviewer (David Gibson d...@au1.ibm.com), it was decided that incrementing the version number for the proposed changes is unnecessary as the patch only introduces new features but not a change in semantics. Please find a new version of the patch where the version number is retained as 1, along with the other planned changes. Thanks, K.Prasad [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. Above pargraph needs revision. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). [Edjunior: Identified an issue in the patch with the sanity check for version numbers] Tested-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado emach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..04656ec 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_EXACT; MODE_RANGE_EXACT? Shouldn't that just be MODE_EXACT? + + p.condition_mode =
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 03:05:52PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:59:39PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:55:13PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:08:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:21:36PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. So, the structure itself doesn't seem to have been extended. I don't understand what the semantic difference is - your patch comment needs to explain this clearly. We had a request to extend the structure but thought it was dangerous to do so. For instance if the user-space used version1 of the structure, while kernel did a copy_to_user() pertaining to version2, then we'd run into problems. Unfortunately the ptrace flags weren't designed to accept a version number as input from the user through the PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO flag (which would have solved this issue). I still don't follow you. Two things here. One, the change of semantics warranted an increment of the version number. The new semantics accepts PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE on BookS, while the old version number did not. I've added a small comment in the code to this effect. Two, regarding changes in the ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info structures - we would like to add more members to it if we can (GDB has a pending request to add more members to it). However the problem foreseen is that there could be a mismatch between the versions of the structure used by the user vs kernel-space i.e. if a new version of the structure, known to the kernel, had an extra member while the user-space still had the old version, then it becomes dangerous because the __copy_to_user function would overflow the buffer size in user-space. This could have been avoided if PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO was originally designed to accept a version number (and provide corresponding struct ppc_debug_info) rather than send a populated ppc_debug_info structure along with the version number. Based on further discussions with the code-reviewer (David Gibson d...@au1.ibm.com), it was decided that incrementing the version number for the proposed changes is unnecessary as the patch only introduces new features but not a change in semantics. Please find a new version of the patch where the version number is retained as 1, along with the other planned changes. Thanks, K.Prasad [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). [Edjunior: Identified an issue in the patch with the sanity check for version numbers] Tested-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado emach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..04656ec 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) + + p.version = 1; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; +
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:59:39PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:55:13PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:08:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:21:36PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. So, the structure itself doesn't seem to have been extended. I don't understand what the semantic difference is - your patch comment needs to explain this clearly. We had a request to extend the structure but thought it was dangerous to do so. For instance if the user-space used version1 of the structure, while kernel did a copy_to_user() pertaining to version2, then we'd run into problems. Unfortunately the ptrace flags weren't designed to accept a version number as input from the user through the PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO flag (which would have solved this issue). I still don't follow you. Two things here. One, the change of semantics warranted an increment of the version number. The new semantics accepts PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE on BookS, while the old version number did not. I've added a small comment in the code to this effect. Two, regarding changes in the ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info structures - we would like to add more members to it if we can (GDB has a pending request to add more members to it). However the problem foreseen is that there could be a mismatch between the versions of the structure used by the user vs kernel-space i.e. if a new version of the structure, known to the kernel, had an extra member while the user-space still had the old version, then it becomes dangerous because the __copy_to_user function would overflow the buffer size in user-space. This could have been avoided if PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO was originally designed to accept a version number (and provide corresponding struct ppc_debug_info) rather than send a populated ppc_debug_info structure along with the version number. I'll add a comment w.r.t change in semantics - such as the ability to accept 'range' breakpoints in BookS. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). What is the mechanism for implementing the range breakpoint on book3s? The hw-breakpoint interface, accepts length as an argument in BookS (any value = 8 Bytes) and would filter out extraneous interrupts arising out of accesses outside the range comprising addr, addr + len inside hw_breakpoint_handler function. We put that ability to use here. Ah, so in hardware the breakpoints are always 8 bytes long, but you filter out false hits on a shorter range? Of course, the utility of range breakpoints is questionable when length =8, but the start must be aligned on an 8-byte boundary. Yes, we ensure that through + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info-addr ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; [snip] if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15 +1400,86 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, dabr |= DABR_DATA_READ; if (bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE; +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (bp_info-version == 1) + goto version_one; There are several legitimate uses of goto in the kernel, but this is definitely not one of them. You're essentially using it to put the old and new versions of the same function in one block. Nasty. Maybe it's the label that's causing bother here. It might look elegant if it was called something like exit_* or error_* :-) The goto here helps reduce code, is similar to the error exits we use everywhere. Rubbish, it is not an exception exit at all, it is two separate code paths for the different versions which would be much clearer as two different functions. I've re-written this part of the code to avoid a goto statement. + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; - child-thread.dabr = dabr; + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (!bp_info-addr) { + if (bp) {
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:08:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:21:36PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. So, the structure itself doesn't seem to have been extended. I don't understand what the semantic difference is - your patch comment needs to explain this clearly. We had a request to extend the structure but thought it was dangerous to do so. For instance if the user-space used version1 of the structure, while kernel did a copy_to_user() pertaining to version2, then we'd run into problems. Unfortunately the ptrace flags weren't designed to accept a version number as input from the user through the PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO flag (which would have solved this issue). I'll add a comment w.r.t change in semantics - such as the ability to accept 'range' breakpoints in BookS. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). What is the mechanism for implementing the range breakpoint on book3s? The hw-breakpoint interface, accepts length as an argument in BookS (any value = 8 Bytes) and would filter out extraneous interrupts arising out of accesses outside the range comprising addr, addr + len inside hw_breakpoint_handler function. We put that ability to use here. [Edjunior: Identified an issue in the patch with the sanity check for version numbers] Tested-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado emach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt | 16 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 104 +++--- 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..97301ae 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) using version 2 + + p.version = 2; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; + 3. PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG Takes an integer which identifies an existing breakpoint or watchpoint diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 05b7dd2..18d28b6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1339,11 +1339,17 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_struct *child, static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + int ret, len = 0; + struct thread_struct *thread = (child-thread); + struct perf_event *bp; + struct perf_event_attr attr; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ I'm confused. This compiled before on book3s, and I don't see any changes to Makefile or Kconfig in the patch that will result in this code compiling when it previously didn't Why are these new guards added? The code is guarded using the CONFIG_ flags for two reasons. a) We don't want the code to be included for BookE and other architectures. b) In BookS, we're now adding a new ability based on whether CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT is defined. Presently this config option is kept on by default, however there are plans to make this a config-time option. #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS unsigned long dabr; #endif - if (bp_info-version != 1) + if ((bp_info-version != 1) (bp_info-version != 2)) return -ENOTSUPP; #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS /* @@ -1382,13 +1388,9 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, */ if ((bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) == 0 ||
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 02:55:13PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:08:50PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:21:36PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. So, the structure itself doesn't seem to have been extended. I don't understand what the semantic difference is - your patch comment needs to explain this clearly. We had a request to extend the structure but thought it was dangerous to do so. For instance if the user-space used version1 of the structure, while kernel did a copy_to_user() pertaining to version2, then we'd run into problems. Unfortunately the ptrace flags weren't designed to accept a version number as input from the user through the PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO flag (which would have solved this issue). I still don't follow you. I'll add a comment w.r.t change in semantics - such as the ability to accept 'range' breakpoints in BookS. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). What is the mechanism for implementing the range breakpoint on book3s? The hw-breakpoint interface, accepts length as an argument in BookS (any value = 8 Bytes) and would filter out extraneous interrupts arising out of accesses outside the range comprising addr, addr + len inside hw_breakpoint_handler function. We put that ability to use here. Ah, so in hardware the breakpoints are always 8 bytes long, but you filter out false hits on a shorter range? Of course, the utility of range breakpoints is questionable when length =8, but the start must be aligned on an 8-byte boundary. [snip] if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15 +1400,86 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, dabr |= DABR_DATA_READ; if (bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE; +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (bp_info-version == 1) + goto version_one; There are several legitimate uses of goto in the kernel, but this is definitely not one of them. You're essentially using it to put the old and new versions of the same function in one block. Nasty. Maybe it's the label that's causing bother here. It might look elegant if it was called something like exit_* or error_* :-) The goto here helps reduce code, is similar to the error exits we use everywhere. Rubbish, it is not an exception exit at all, it is two separate code paths for the different versions which would be much clearer as two different functions. + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; - child-thread.dabr = dabr; + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (!bp_info-addr) { + if (bp) { + unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp); + thread-ptrace_bps[0] = NULL; + } + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return 0; Why are you making setting a 0 watchpoint remove the existing one (I think that's what this does). I thought there was an explicit del breakpoint operation instead. We had to define the semantics for what writing a 0 to DABR could mean, and I think it is intuitive to consider it as deletion request...couldn't think of a case where DABR with addr=0 and RW=1 would be required. When a user space program maps pages at virtual address 0, which it can do. + } + /* + * Check if the request is for 'range' breakpoints. We can + * support it if range 8 bytes. + */ + if (bp_info-addr_mode == PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE) + len = bp_info-addr2 - bp_info-addr; So you compute the length here, but I don't see you ever test if it is 8 and return an error. The hw-breakpoint interfaces would fail if the length was 8. Ok. + else if (bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT) { + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (bp) { + attr = bp-attr; + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info-addr ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; + arch_bp_generic_fields(dabr + (DABR_DATA_WRITE |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:21:36PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote: PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. So, the structure itself doesn't seem to have been extended. I don't understand what the semantic difference is - your patch comment needs to explain this clearly. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). What is the mechanism for implementing the range breakpoint on book3s? [Edjunior: Identified an issue in the patch with the sanity check for version numbers] Tested-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado emach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt | 16 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 104 +++--- 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..97301ae 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) using version 2 + + p.version = 2; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; + 3. PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG Takes an integer which identifies an existing breakpoint or watchpoint diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 05b7dd2..18d28b6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1339,11 +1339,17 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_struct *child, static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + int ret, len = 0; + struct thread_struct *thread = (child-thread); + struct perf_event *bp; + struct perf_event_attr attr; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ I'm confused. This compiled before on book3s, and I don't see any changes to Makefile or Kconfig in the patch that will result in this code compiling when it previously didn't Why are these new guards added? #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS unsigned long dabr; #endif - if (bp_info-version != 1) + if ((bp_info-version != 1) (bp_info-version != 2)) return -ENOTSUPP; #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS /* @@ -1382,13 +1388,9 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, */ if ((bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) == 0 || (bp_info-trigger_type ~PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) != 0 || - bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT || bp_info-condition_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE) return -EINVAL; - if (child-thread.dabr) - return -ENOSPC; - You remove this test to see if the single watchpoint slot is already in use, but I don't see another test replacing it. if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15 +1400,86 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, dabr |= DABR_DATA_READ; if (bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE; +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (bp_info-version == 1) + goto version_one; There are several legitimate uses of goto in the kernel, but this is definitely not one of them. You're essentially using it to put the old and new versions of the same function in one block. Nasty. + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; - child-thread.dabr = dabr; + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (!bp_info-addr) { + if (bp) { + unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp); +
[PATCH 1/2] [hw-breakpoint] Use generic hw-breakpoint interfaces for new PPC ptrace flags
PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG and PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG are PowerPC specific ptrace flags that use the watchpoint register. While they are targeted primarily towards BookE users, user-space applications such as GDB have started using them for BookS too. This patch enables the use of generic hardware breakpoint interfaces for these new flags. The version number of the associated data structures ppc_hw_breakpoint and ppc_debug_info is incremented to denote new semantics. Apart from the usual benefits of using generic hw-breakpoint interfaces, these changes allow debuggers (such as GDB) to use a common set of ptrace flags for their watchpoint needs and allow more precise breakpoint specification (length of the variable can be specified). [Edjunior: Identified an issue in the patch with the sanity check for version numbers] Tested-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado emach...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: K.Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt | 16 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 104 +++--- 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt index f4a5499..97301ae 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/ptrace.txt @@ -127,6 +127,22 @@ Some examples of using the structure to: p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; p.condition_value = 0; +- set a watchpoint in server processors (BookS) using version 2 + + p.version = 2; + p.trigger_type= PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; + or + p.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_EXACT; + + p.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + p.addr= (uint64_t) begin_range; + /* For PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE addr2 needs to be specified, where + * addr2 - addr = 8 Bytes. + */ + p.addr2 = (uint64_t) end_range; + p.condition_value = 0; + 3. PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG Takes an integer which identifies an existing breakpoint or watchpoint diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 05b7dd2..18d28b6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1339,11 +1339,17 @@ static int set_dac_range(struct task_struct *child, static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + int ret, len = 0; + struct thread_struct *thread = (child-thread); + struct perf_event *bp; + struct perf_event_attr attr; +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS unsigned long dabr; #endif - if (bp_info-version != 1) + if ((bp_info-version != 1) (bp_info-version != 2)) return -ENOTSUPP; #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS /* @@ -1382,13 +1388,9 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, */ if ((bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) == 0 || (bp_info-trigger_type ~PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW) != 0 || - bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT || bp_info-condition_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE) return -EINVAL; - if (child-thread.dabr) - return -ENOSPC; - if ((unsigned long)bp_info-addr = TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; @@ -1398,15 +1400,86 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, dabr |= DABR_DATA_READ; if (bp_info-trigger_type PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) dabr |= DABR_DATA_WRITE; +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT + if (bp_info-version == 1) + goto version_one; + if (ptrace_get_breakpoints(child) 0) + return -ESRCH; - child-thread.dabr = dabr; + bp = thread-ptrace_bps[0]; + if (!bp_info-addr) { + if (bp) { + unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp); + thread-ptrace_bps[0] = NULL; + } + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return 0; + } + /* +* Check if the request is for 'range' breakpoints. We can +* support it if range 8 bytes. +*/ + if (bp_info-addr_mode == PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE) + len = bp_info-addr2 - bp_info-addr; + else if (bp_info-addr_mode != PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT) { + ptrace_put_breakpoints(child); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (bp) { + attr = bp-attr; + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info-addr ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; + arch_bp_generic_fields(dabr + (DABR_DATA_WRITE | DABR_DATA_READ), +