Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/pseries: Add key to flags in pSeries_lpar_hpte_updateboltedpp()

2021-02-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
Daniel Axtens  writes:
> Michael Ellerman  writes:
>
>> The flags argument to plpar_pte_protect() (aka. H_PROTECT), includes
>> the key in bits 9-13, but currently we always set those bits to zero.
>>
>> In the past that hasn't been a problem because we always used key 0
>> for the kernel, and updateboltedpp() is only used for kernel mappings.
>>
>> However since commit d94b827e89dc ("powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Use Key 3
>> for kernel mapping with hash translation") we are now inadvertently
>> changing the key (to zero) when we call plpar_pte_protect().
>>
>> That hasn't broken anything because updateboltedpp() is only used for
>> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, which is currently disabled on 64s due to other
>> bugs.
>>
>> But we want to fix that, so first we need to pass the key correctly to
>> plpar_pte_protect(). In the `newpp` value the low 3 bits of the key
>> are already in the correct spot, but the high 2 bits of the key need
>> to be shifted down.
>>
>> Fixes: d94b827e89dc ("powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Use Key 3 for kernel mapping 
>> with hash translation")
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
>> index 764170fdb0f7..8bbbddff7226 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
>> @@ -976,11 +976,13 @@ static void pSeries_lpar_hpte_updateboltedpp(unsigned 
>> long newpp,
>>  slot = pSeries_lpar_hpte_find(vpn, psize, ssize);
>>  BUG_ON(slot == -1);
>>  
>> -flags = newpp & 7;
>> +flags = newpp & (HPTE_R_PP | HPTE_R_N);
>>  if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_KERNEL_RO))
>>  /* Move pp0 into bit 8 (IBM 55) */
>>  flags |= (newpp & HPTE_R_PP0) >> 55;
>>  
>> +flags |= ((newpp & HPTE_R_KEY_HI) >> 48) | (newpp & HPTE_R_KEY_LO);
>> +
>
> I'm really confused about how these bits are getting packed into the
> flags parameter. It seems to match how they are unpacked in
> kvmppc_h_pr_protect, but I cannot figure out why they are packed in that
> order, and the LoPAR doesn't seem especially illuminating on this topic
> - although I may have missed the relevant section.

Yeah I agree it's not very clearly specified.

The hcall we're using here is H_PROTECT, which is specified in section
14.5.4.1.6 of LoPAPR v1.1.

It takes a `flags` parameter, and the description for flags says:

 * flags: AVPN, pp0, pp1, pp2, key0-key4, n, and for the CMO
   option: CMO Option flags as defined in Table 189‚


If you then go to the start of the parent section, 14.5.4.1, on page
405, it says:

Register Linkage (For hcall() tokens 0x04 - 0x18)
 * On Call
   * R3 function call token
   * R4 flags (see Table 178‚ “Page Frame Table Access flags field definition‚” 
on page 401)


Then you have to go to section 14.5.3, and on page 394 there is a list
of hcalls and their tokens (table 176), and there you can see that
H_PROTECT == 0x18.

Finally you can look at table 178, on page 401, where it specifies the
layout of the bits for the key:

 Bit Function
--
 50-54 | key0-key4


Those are big-endian bit numbers, converting to normal bit numbers you
get bits 9-13, or 0x3e00.

If you look at the kernel source we have:

#define HPTE_R_KEY_HI   ASM_CONST(0x3000)
#define HPTE_R_KEY_LO   ASM_CONST(0x0e00)

So the LO bits are already in the right place, and the HI bits just need
to be shifted down by 48.

Hope that makes it clearer :)

cheers


Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/pseries: Add key to flags in pSeries_lpar_hpte_updateboltedpp()

2021-02-15 Thread Daniel Axtens
Michael Ellerman  writes:

> The flags argument to plpar_pte_protect() (aka. H_PROTECT), includes
> the key in bits 9-13, but currently we always set those bits to zero.
>
> In the past that hasn't been a problem because we always used key 0
> for the kernel, and updateboltedpp() is only used for kernel mappings.
>
> However since commit d94b827e89dc ("powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Use Key 3
> for kernel mapping with hash translation") we are now inadvertently
> changing the key (to zero) when we call plpar_pte_protect().
>
> That hasn't broken anything because updateboltedpp() is only used for
> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, which is currently disabled on 64s due to other
> bugs.
>
> But we want to fix that, so first we need to pass the key correctly to
> plpar_pte_protect(). In the `newpp` value the low 3 bits of the key
> are already in the correct spot, but the high 2 bits of the key need
> to be shifted down.
>
> Fixes: d94b827e89dc ("powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Use Key 3 for kernel mapping 
> with hash translation")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
> index 764170fdb0f7..8bbbddff7226 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
> @@ -976,11 +976,13 @@ static void pSeries_lpar_hpte_updateboltedpp(unsigned 
> long newpp,
>   slot = pSeries_lpar_hpte_find(vpn, psize, ssize);
>   BUG_ON(slot == -1);
>  
> - flags = newpp & 7;
> + flags = newpp & (HPTE_R_PP | HPTE_R_N);
>   if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_KERNEL_RO))
>   /* Move pp0 into bit 8 (IBM 55) */
>   flags |= (newpp & HPTE_R_PP0) >> 55;
>  
> + flags |= ((newpp & HPTE_R_KEY_HI) >> 48) | (newpp & HPTE_R_KEY_LO);
> +

I'm really confused about how these bits are getting packed into the
flags parameter. It seems to match how they are unpacked in
kvmppc_h_pr_protect, but I cannot figure out why they are packed in that
order, and the LoPAR doesn't seem especially illuminating on this topic
- although I may have missed the relevant section.

Kind regards,
Daniel

>   lpar_rc = plpar_pte_protect(flags, slot, 0);
>  
>   BUG_ON(lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS);
> -- 
> 2.25.1


[PATCH 2/6] powerpc/pseries: Add key to flags in pSeries_lpar_hpte_updateboltedpp()

2021-02-11 Thread Michael Ellerman
The flags argument to plpar_pte_protect() (aka. H_PROTECT), includes
the key in bits 9-13, but currently we always set those bits to zero.

In the past that hasn't been a problem because we always used key 0
for the kernel, and updateboltedpp() is only used for kernel mappings.

However since commit d94b827e89dc ("powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Use Key 3
for kernel mapping with hash translation") we are now inadvertently
changing the key (to zero) when we call plpar_pte_protect().

That hasn't broken anything because updateboltedpp() is only used for
STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, which is currently disabled on 64s due to other
bugs.

But we want to fix that, so first we need to pass the key correctly to
plpar_pte_protect(). In the `newpp` value the low 3 bits of the key
are already in the correct spot, but the high 2 bits of the key need
to be shifted down.

Fixes: d94b827e89dc ("powerpc/book3s64/kuap: Use Key 3 for kernel mapping with 
hash translation")
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman 
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
index 764170fdb0f7..8bbbddff7226 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
@@ -976,11 +976,13 @@ static void pSeries_lpar_hpte_updateboltedpp(unsigned 
long newpp,
slot = pSeries_lpar_hpte_find(vpn, psize, ssize);
BUG_ON(slot == -1);
 
-   flags = newpp & 7;
+   flags = newpp & (HPTE_R_PP | HPTE_R_N);
if (mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_KERNEL_RO))
/* Move pp0 into bit 8 (IBM 55) */
flags |= (newpp & HPTE_R_PP0) >> 55;
 
+   flags |= ((newpp & HPTE_R_KEY_HI) >> 48) | (newpp & HPTE_R_KEY_LO);
+
lpar_rc = plpar_pte_protect(flags, slot, 0);
 
BUG_ON(lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS);
-- 
2.25.1