[PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Hi, recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC platforms. Here is the thread about it. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed Based on current ppc/next. If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. Thanks, Michal Changes in v2: - Remove also sound/drivers/pcm-indirect2.[ch] files Reported-by: Takashi Iwai - Based on my chat with Arnd I removed arch/powerpc/xmon/ changes done in v1 to keep them the same as before. (kbuild reported some issues with it too) Michal Simek (2): sound: ac97: Remove sound driver for ancient platform powerpc: Remove Xilinx PPC405/PPC440 support Documentation/devicetree/bindings/xilinx.txt | 143 -- Documentation/powerpc/bootwrapper.rst| 28 +- MAINTAINERS |6 - arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug |2 +- arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile |7 +- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/Makefile |1 - arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml507.dts| 406 -- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml510.dts| 466 --- arch/powerpc/boot/ops.h |1 - arch/powerpc/boot/serial.c |5 - arch/powerpc/boot/uartlite.c | 79 -- arch/powerpc/boot/virtex.c | 97 -- arch/powerpc/boot/virtex405-head.S | 31 - arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper|8 - arch/powerpc/configs/40x/virtex_defconfig| 75 - arch/powerpc/configs/44x/virtex5_defconfig | 74 - arch/powerpc/configs/ppc40x_defconfig|8 - arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig|8 - arch/powerpc/include/asm/xilinx_intc.h | 16 - arch/powerpc/include/asm/xilinx_pci.h| 21 - arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c | 39 - arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/Kconfig | 31 - arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/Makefile |1 - arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c | 54 - arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig | 37 - arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Makefile |2 - arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/virtex.c | 60 - arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/virtex_ml510.c| 30 - arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig |4 - arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile |2 - arch/powerpc/sysdev/xilinx_intc.c| 88 -- arch/powerpc/sysdev/xilinx_pci.c | 132 -- drivers/char/Kconfig |2 +- drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig |2 +- sound/drivers/Kconfig| 12 - sound/drivers/Makefile |2 - sound/drivers/ml403-ac97cr.c | 1298 -- sound/drivers/pcm-indirect2.c| 560 sound/drivers/pcm-indirect2.h| 127 -- 39 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3958 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml507.dts delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml510.dts delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/uartlite.c delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/virtex.c delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/virtex405-head.S delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/40x/virtex_defconfig delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/44x/virtex5_defconfig delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/xilinx_intc.h delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/xilinx_pci.h delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/virtex.c delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/virtex_ml510.c delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xilinx_intc.c delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xilinx_pci.c delete mode 100644 sound/drivers/ml403-ac97cr.c delete mode 100644 sound/drivers/pcm-indirect2.c delete mode 100644 sound/drivers/pcm-indirect2.h -- 2.26.0
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Michal Simek writes: > Hi, > > recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function > which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC > platforms. Here is the thread about it. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ > > I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these > platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really > running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense > to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. > > U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it > https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed > > Based on current ppc/next. > > If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, especially given people are distracted at the moment. I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. cheers
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michal Simek writes: >> Hi, >> >> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ >> >> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >> >> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >> >> Based on current ppc/next. >> >> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. > > Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. > > I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to > the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, > especially given people are distracted at the moment. > > I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please let me know what way you prefer. Thanks, Michal
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Michal Simek writes: > On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Michal Simek writes: >>> Hi, >>> >>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function >>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ >>> >>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense >>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>> >>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>> >>> Based on current ppc/next. >>> >>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >> >> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >> >> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >> >> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. > > Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his > series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. > > If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and > this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please > let me know what way you prefer. It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as well, it's already been acked. cheers
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Michal Simek writes: > > On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> Michal Simek writes: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function > >>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC > >>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ > >>> > >>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these > >>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really > >>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes > >>> sense > >>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. > >>> > >>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it > >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed > >>> > >>> Based on current ppc/next. > >>> > >>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. > >> > >> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. > >> > >> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to > >> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, > >> especially given people are distracted at the moment. > >> > >> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. > > > > Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his > > series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. > > > > If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and > > this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please > > let me know what way you prefer. > > It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as > well, it's already been acked. Sure, please go ahead. thanks, Takashi
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, > Michael Ellerman wrote: >> >> Michal Simek writes: >>> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: Michal Simek writes: > Hi, > > recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function > which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC > platforms. Here is the thread about it. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ > > I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these > platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really > running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes > sense > to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. > > U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it > https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed > > Based on current ppc/next. > > If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, especially given people are distracted at the moment. I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >>> >>> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >>> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >>> >>> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >>> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >>> let me know what way you prefer. >> >> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >> well, it's already been acked. > > Sure, please go ahead. g8. Thanks, Michal
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Hi Michael, On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: > On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> >>> Michal Simek writes: On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michal Simek writes: >> Hi, >> >> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that >> function >> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ >> >> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these >> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes >> sense >> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >> >> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >> >> Based on current ppc/next. >> >> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. > > Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. > > I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to > the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, > especially given people are distracted at the moment. > > I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please let me know what way you prefer. >>> >>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >>> well, it's already been acked. >> >> Sure, please go ahead. > > > g8. Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP/Versal SoCs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Michal Simek writes: > Hi Michael, > > On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: >> On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >>> Michael Ellerman wrote: Michal Simek writes: > On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Michal Simek writes: >>> Hi, >>> >>> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that >>> function >>> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >>> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ >>> >>> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in >>> these >>> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >>> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes >>> sense >>> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >>> >>> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >>> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >>> >>> Based on current ppc/next. >>> >>> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >> >> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >> >> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >> >> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. > > Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his > series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. > > If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and > this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please > let me know what way you prefer. It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as well, it's already been acked. > > Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe > which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would > like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none > raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be in v5.8. Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. cheers
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Hi Michael, On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michal Simek writes: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: >>> On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Michal Simek writes: >> On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Michal Simek writes: Hi, recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC platforms. Here is the thread about it. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed Based on current ppc/next. If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. >>> >>> Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. >>> >>> I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to >>> the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, >>> especially given people are distracted at the moment. >>> >>> I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. >> >> Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his >> series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. >> >> If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and >> this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please >> let me know what way you prefer. > > It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as > well, it's already been acked. >> >> Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe >> which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would >> like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none >> raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. > > Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. > > I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be > in v5.8. > > Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you > say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. > > I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. I took a look at your https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo and I can't see any branch with my patches. Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. Thanks, Michal
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Hi, Le 03/06/2020 à 10:10, Michal Simek a écrit : Hi Michael, On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: Michal Simek writes: Hi Michael, On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, Michael Ellerman wrote: Michal Simek writes: On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: Michal Simek writes: Hi, recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC platforms. Here is the thread about it. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed Based on current ppc/next. If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to object, especially given people are distracted at the moment. I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please let me know what way you prefer. It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as well, it's already been acked. Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be in v5.8. Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. I took a look at your https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo and I can't see any branch with my patches. Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. I see them in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git in next-test branch. Christophe
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
On 03. 06. 20 10:13, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Hi, > > Le 03/06/2020 à 10:10, Michal Simek a écrit : >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Michal Simek writes: Hi Michael, On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: > On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> >>> Michal Simek writes: On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michal Simek writes: >> Hi, >> >> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found >> that function >> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx >> PowerPC >> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ >> >> >> I have been talking about it internally and there is no >> interest in these >> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is >> really >> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think >> it makes sense >> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this >> platform. >> >> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain >> about it >> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >> >> >> Based on current ppc/next. >> >> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. > > Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. > > I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too > close to > the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time > to object, > especially given people are distracted at the moment. > > I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major > objections. Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please let me know what way you prefer. >>> >>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa >>> patch as >>> well, it's already been acked. Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. >>> >>> Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. >>> >>> I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be >>> in v5.8. >>> >>> Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you >>> say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. >>> >>> I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. >> >> I took a look at your >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo >> and I can't see any branch with my patches. >> Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. >> That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. > > I see them in > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git in > next-test branch. ah. My bad. Thanks, Michal
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
Christophe Leroy writes: > Hi, > > Le 03/06/2020 à 10:10, Michal Simek a écrit : >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 26. 05. 20 15:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> Michal Simek writes: Hi Michael, On 01. 04. 20 13:30, Michal Simek wrote: > On 01. 04. 20 12:38, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 12:35:16 +0200, >> Michael Ellerman wrote: >>> >>> Michal Simek writes: On 01. 04. 20 4:07, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Michal Simek writes: >> Hi, >> >> recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that >> function >> which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC >> platforms. Here is the thread about it. >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ >> >> I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in >> these >> platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really >> running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it >> makes sense >> to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. >> >> U-Boot support was removed in 2017 without anybody complain about it >> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/98f705c9cefdfdba62c069821bbba10273a0a8ed >> >> Based on current ppc/next. >> >> If anyone has any objection about it, please let me know. > > Thanks for taking the time to find all this code and remove it. > > I'm not going to take this series for v5.7, it was posted too close to > the merge window, and doing so wouldn't give people much time to > object, > especially given people are distracted at the moment. > > I'm happy to take it for v5.8, assuming there's no major objections. Sure. Just to let you know Christophe Leroy included this patch in his series about ppc405 removal. It should be the same. If you don't want to take that alsa patch I can send it separately and this patch can be taken from his series. I don't really mind but please let me know what way you prefer. >>> >>> It's better to keep it all together, so I'm happy take the alsa patch as >>> well, it's already been acked. Can you please take this series? I know that there is v5 from Christophe which has this 1/2 as 1/13. But I need this alsa patch too and I would like to close this because it is around for almost 2 months and none raised a concern about removing just these Xilinx platforms. >>> >>> Sorry I meant to reply to your last mail. >>> >>> I have Christophe's series in my testing branch, planning for it to be >>> in v5.8. >>> >>> Even if the rest of his series doesn't make it for some reason, as you >>> say the Xilinx removal is uncontroversial so I'll keep that in. >>> >>> I forgot about the sound patch, I'll pick that up as well. >> >> I took a look at your >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git repo >> and I can't see any branch with my patches. >> Also was checking linux-next and my patches are also not there. >> That's why I am curious if this will be go v5.8 in MW. > > I see them in > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git in > next-test branch. Which == the next branch, which is what will go into v5.8, all going well. cheers
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:32:15 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > recently we wanted to update xilinx intc driver and we found that function > which we wanted to remove is still wired by ancient Xilinx PowerPC > platforms. Here is the thread about it. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/48d3232d-0f1d-42ea-3109-f44bbabfa...@xilinx.com/ > > I have been talking about it internally and there is no interest in these > platforms and it is also orphan for quite a long time. None is really > running/testing these platforms regularly that's why I think it makes sense > to remove them also with drivers which are specific to this platform. > > [...] Applied to powerpc/next. [1/2] sound: ac97: Remove sound driver for ancient platform https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/f16dca3e30c14aff545a834a7c1a1bb02b9edb48 [2/2] powerpc: Remove Xilinx PPC405/PPC440 support https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7ade8495dcfd788a76e6877c9ea86f5207369ea4 cheers
