Re: [i2c] [PATCH 0/2] i2c: Add support for device alias names

[Wolfram Sang]

Hello Jean,

I tested on this hardware

 MPC8260 (powerpc) + PCF8575 (io expander) + LM84 (sensor)
 + RS5C372 (rtc) + X24645 (eeprom)

the following software

 2.6.25-git11 + your 2 patches + Patches 5-7 from Jochen's series
 (for the CPM2-bus-driver)

The rtc and the eeprom were assigend through of-tree. The expander
and the sensor were assigned via the old-binding method using
force-parameters.

It builds fine, except for two warnings of redefinitions in Jochen's
patches. (I think they need a few updates anyhow). The output in
modules.alias and /sys make sense. I2C works flawlessly for all
devices.

Please let me know, if you need to more information.

All the best,

   Wolfram

-- 
  Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [i2c] [PATCH 0/2] i2c: Add support for device alias names

[Jochen Friedrich]

Hi Wolfram,

> I tested on this hardware
> 
>  MPC8260 (powerpc) + PCF8575 (io expander) + LM84 (sensor)
>  + RS5C372 (rtc) + X24645 (eeprom)

It's also OK on dbox2 hardware: MPC823 (powerpc)
+ saa7127 (patch needed to add id_table) + dbox frontprocessor
(8051 controller with i2c interface).

Thanks,
Jochen
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev