Re: PMU_IOC_SLEEP failed
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 00:35 +0100, jjDaNiMoTh wrote: (dmesg..) [...] radeonfb_pci_register BEGIN radeonfb :00:10.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem 0xb800-0xbfff pref] radeonfb (:00:10.0): cannot request region 0. radeonfb: probe of :00:10.0 failed with error -16 That looks bad indeed. Send me the complete dmesg, a snapshot of the device-tree (tar -c /proc/device-tree foo.tar) and the output of /proc/iomem please. [1] http://nat.vacau.com/linux/iomem.txt.gz [2] http://nat.vacau.com/linux/dmesg_37-rc.txt.gz [3] http://nat.vacau.com/linux/device_tree.tar Are you trying to use radeonfb as a module ? The dmesg seems to indicate that you have offb taking control of the framebuffer, preventing radeonfb from loading. There's no offb-radeonfb handover (the handover mechanism is new and only used by KMS for now). On those machines, radeonfb should be built-in. Cheers, Ben. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
PMU_IOC_SLEEP failed
Hi all, what could be the problem here? [r...@myhost ~]# /usr/lib/hal/hal-system-power-pmu sleep power-pmu : PMU_IOC_SLEEP failed (same with pm-suspend, kernel version: any = 2.6.33. I'm now on a .37-rc). KMS is disabled (modprobe radeon modeset=0, and I can't switch over VT). userspace thing has kms for radeon disabled (libdrm, mesa, xf86-video-ati). There are some important parts of config should I attach? Thanks ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: PMU_IOC_SLEEP failed
On Die, 2010-12-28 at 13:25 +0100, jjDaNiMoTh wrote: what could be the problem here? [r...@myhost ~]# /usr/lib/hal/hal-system-power-pmu sleep power-pmu : PMU_IOC_SLEEP failed (same with pm-suspend, kernel version: any = 2.6.33. I'm now on a .37-rc). KMS is disabled (modprobe radeon modeset=0, and I can't switch over VT). What exactly does can't switch over VT mean? Sleep requires radeonfb, is that enabled? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer |http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: PMU_IOC_SLEEP failed
2010/12/28 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net:
[cut]
What exactly does can't switch over VT mean?
After X is running, I can't switch over ctrl + alt + f{1,2,3,4,5,6}
consoles ( the screen flicker, then blank ). If I switch to f7, where
X live, all return to normal and I can see normal X window.
This doesn't happend with X active.
Sleep requires radeonfb, is that enabled?
Of course, but I think there is something wrong:
(dmesg..)
[...]
radeonfb_pci_register BEGIN
radeonfb :00:10.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem 0xb800-0xbfff pref]
radeonfb (:00:10.0): cannot request region 0.
radeonfb: probe of :00:10.0 failed with error -16
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: PMU_IOC_SLEEP failed
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 17:39 +0100, jjDaNiMoTh wrote:
2010/12/28 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net:
[cut]
What exactly does can't switch over VT mean?
After X is running, I can't switch over ctrl + alt + f{1,2,3,4,5,6}
consoles ( the screen flicker, then blank ). If I switch to f7, where
X live, all return to normal and I can see normal X window.
This doesn't happend with X active.
Sleep requires radeonfb, is that enabled?
Of course, but I think there is something wrong:
(dmesg..)
[...]
radeonfb_pci_register BEGIN
radeonfb :00:10.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem 0xb800-0xbfff pref]
radeonfb (:00:10.0): cannot request region 0.
radeonfb: probe of :00:10.0 failed with error -16
That looks bad indeed. Send me the complete dmesg, a snapshot of the
device-tree (tar -c /proc/device-tree foo.tar) and the output
of /proc/iomem please.
Cheers,
Ben.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
