RE: [PATCH 2/4] fsl_pci: Add a workaround for PCI 5 errata in MPC8548

2012-03-08 Thread Zhao Chenhui-B35336 
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
> 
> > +   if ((fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548) || fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548_E)) &&
> 
> Should this also have 8547, 8547E, 8545, 8545E, 8543, & 8543E?

Yes. I will include these chips.

-Chenhui

> 
> > +   !early_find_capability(hose, 0, 0, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX)) {
> > +   early_read_config_word(hose, 0, 0,
> > +   PCI_BUS_FUNCTION, &temp);
> > +   temp |= PCI_BUS_FUNCTION_MDS;
> > +   early_write_config_word(hose, 0, 0,
> > +   PCI_BUS_FUNCTION, temp);
> > +   }
> > }
> 


___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH 2/4] fsl_pci: Add a workaround for PCI 5 errata in MPC8548

2012-03-06 Thread Kumar Gala 

On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:

> + if ((fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548) || fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548_E)) &&

Should this also have 8547, 8547E, 8545, 8545E, 8543, & 8543E?

> + !early_find_capability(hose, 0, 0, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX)) {
> + early_read_config_word(hose, 0, 0,
> + PCI_BUS_FUNCTION, &temp);
> + temp |= PCI_BUS_FUNCTION_MDS;
> + early_write_config_word(hose, 0, 0,
> + PCI_BUS_FUNCTION, temp);
> + }
>   }

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev