Re: [PATCH 1/7] powerpc and sparc: introduce dev_archdata node accessors

2008-10-16 Thread David Miller
From: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:12:51 +0400

 The name of the device_node field differ across the platforms, so we
 have to implement inlined accessors. This is needed to avoid ugly
 #ifdef in the generic code.
 
 Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm happy to just change this member name on sparc to match
powerpc's choice.

That being said, this abstraction still has value and I'd
like to let you merge this now and make forward progress
so:

Acked-by: David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: [PATCH 1/7] powerpc and sparc: introduce dev_archdata node accessors

2008-10-16 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:36 PM, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:12:51 +0400

 The name of the device_node field differ across the platforms, so we
 have to implement inlined accessors. This is needed to avoid ugly
 #ifdef in the generic code.

 Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I'm happy to just change this member name on sparc to match
 powerpc's choice.

 That being said, this abstraction still has value and I'd
 like to let you merge this now and make forward progress
 so:

 Acked-by: David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I agree;

Acked-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev