On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This adds the guest portion of the hypercall infrastructure.
Version 3 now follows the beat ABI, but proposes a new
implementation style as
static inline asm functions instead of pure assembler code. That
should allow
the compiler to be more flexible and therefore a better optimization.
If people agree on that new implementation style we might merge this
code.
The current implementation of beat style hypercalls can be found in
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/beat_hvCall.S
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
[diffstat]
epapr_hcalls.h | 59 +++
++
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
[diff]
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/epapr_hcalls.h b/include/asm-
powerpc/epapr_hcalls.h
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/epapr_hcalls.h
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/*
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2,
as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
02110-1301, USA.
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2008
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ */
+
+#ifndef __POWERPC_EPAPR_HCALLS_H__
+#define __POWERPC_EPAPR_HCALLS_H__
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
+/* Hypercalls use the beat ABI */
+#define KVM_HYPERCALL_BIN 0x4422
Any reason this isn't 'sc' ?
Also, can we make this "sc 1" so its works when we have HW hypervisor
support?
- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
