Re: [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 +
 +static inline void udelay(unsigned long usec)
 +{
 +}

shouldnt this function be named zerodelay() ?

Thanks,
tglx



___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support

[Michal Simek]

 +
 +static inline void udelay(unsigned long usec)
 +{
 +}

shouldnt this function be named zerodelay() ?

Thanks,
   tglx

I have prepared implementation of this function which sent me JW.
I did some changes which I test it because I found problem there. 

M





___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev