Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 08:59 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an attention for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Kindly connect to the concerned. I'm putting your patch to l2-mtd-2.6.git. Thanks very much. Would i receive some automatic confirmation once it make to Linus tree ? Regards-- Subrata ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an attention for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Kindly connect to the concerned. I'm putting your patch to l2-mtd-2.6.git. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
Subrata Modak wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 08:59 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an attention for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Kindly connect to the concerned. I'm putting your patch to l2-mtd-2.6.git. Thanks very much. Would i receive some automatic confirmation once it make to Linus tree ? I do not think so. I'm not MTD maintainer and in l2-mtd-2.6.git I just collect random patches, which the maintainer then usually takes from my tree. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:18 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: Subrata Modak wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 08:59 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an attention for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Kindly connect to the concerned. I'm putting your patch to l2-mtd-2.6.git. Thanks very much. Would i receive some automatic confirmation once it make to Linus tree ? I do not think so. I'm not MTD maintainer and in l2-mtd-2.6.git I just collect random patches, which the maintainer then usually takes from my tree. Thanks. I just want this through before 2.6.31 stable is released, so that the build fails does not occur on next trees based on that stable one. Regards-- Subrata ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 12:42 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:18 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: Subrata Modak wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 08:59 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an attention for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Kindly connect to the concerned. I'm putting your patch to l2-mtd-2.6.git. Thanks very much. Would i receive some automatic confirmation once it make to Linus tree ? I do not think so. I'm not MTD maintainer and in l2-mtd-2.6.git I just collect random patches, which the maintainer then usually takes from my tree. Thanks. I just want this through before 2.6.31 stable is released, so that the build fails does not occur on next trees based on that stable one. Then you should bug dwmw2. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 10:14 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 12:42 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:18 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: Subrata Modak wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 08:59 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 07:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Hi, Is there somebody else whom i should also address to get an attention for this patch ? I apolozise if i have not included someone. Kindly connect to the concerned. I'm putting your patch to l2-mtd-2.6.git. Thanks very much. Would i receive some automatic confirmation once it make to Linus tree ? I do not think so. I'm not MTD maintainer and in l2-mtd-2.6.git I just collect random patches, which the maintainer then usually takes from my tree. Thanks. I just want this through before 2.6.31 stable is released, so that the build fails does not occur on next trees based on that stable one. Then you should bug dwmw2. Hmmm. I see. Hi dwmw2, Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is released ? Regards-- Subrata ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is released ? Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for 2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32. Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it? It's been like this for _ages_. -- David WoodhouseOpen Source Technology Centre david.woodho...@intel.com Intel Corporation ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is released ? Hi David, Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for 2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32. Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it? It's been like this for _ages_. True. But it gives annoying build fails on randconfig next trees. And we(Sachin myself) has been reporting it from March/April. If you feel there is still room to be pushed to 2.6.31, then please do it. Else, 2.6.32 will be fine. Thanks for your support. Regards-- Subrata ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
