Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: mm: fixup preempt undefflow with huge pages

2016-03-30 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 03/30/2016 02:41 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> The merge window just closed, I'm still recovering.
> 
> I've got it in my fixes branch locally, I'll probably push that today to
> linux-next.

Thank you.

> 
> cheers
> 
Sebastian
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: mm: fixup preempt undefflow with huge pages

2016-03-29 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 15:40 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

> On 2016-03-10 01:04:24 [+0530], Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

> > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior  writes:
> 
> *ping*
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/593943/

*pong*

The merge window just closed, I'm still recovering.

I've got it in my fixes branch locally, I'll probably push that today to
linux-next.

cheers

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: mm: fixup preempt undefflow with huge pages

2016-03-29 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-03-10 01:04:24 [+0530], Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior  writes:

*ping*
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/593943/

> > [ text/plain ]
> > hugepd_free() used __get_cpu_var() once. Nothing ensured that the code
> > accessing the variable did not migrate from one CPU to another and soon
> > this was noticed by Tiejun Chen in 94b09d755462 ("powerpc/hugetlb:
> > Replace __get_cpu_var with get_cpu_var"). So we had it fixed.
> >
> > Christoph Lameter was doing his __get_cpu_var() replaces and forgot
> > PowerPC. Then he noticed this and sent his fixed up batch again which
> > got applied as 69111bac42f5 ("powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses").
> >
> > The careful reader will noticed one little detail: get_cpu_var() got
> > replaced with this_cpu_ptr(). So now we have a put_cpu_var() which does
> > a preempt_enable() and nothing that does preempt_disable() so we
> > underflow the preempt counter.
> >
> 
> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V 
> 
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> > Cc: Christoph Lameter 
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> > Cc: 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
> > ---
> > v1…v2: - use get_cpu_var() instead of get_cpu_ptr()
> >- correct indentation of put_cpu_var()
> >
> >  arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > index 744e24bcb85c..4a811ca7ac9d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > @@ -414,13 +414,13 @@ static void hugepd_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void 
> > *hugepte)
> >  {
> > struct hugepd_freelist **batchp;
> >  
> > -   batchp = this_cpu_ptr(&hugepd_freelist_cur);
> > +   batchp = &get_cpu_var(hugepd_freelist_cur);
> >  
> > if (atomic_read(&tlb->mm->mm_users) < 2 ||
> > cpumask_equal(mm_cpumask(tlb->mm),
> >   cpumask_of(smp_processor_id( {
> > kmem_cache_free(hugepte_cache, hugepte);
> > -put_cpu_var(hugepd_freelist_cur);
> > +   put_cpu_var(hugepd_freelist_cur);
> > return;
> > }
> >  

Sebastian
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: mm: fixup preempt undefflow with huge pages

2016-03-09 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior  writes:

> [ text/plain ]
> hugepd_free() used __get_cpu_var() once. Nothing ensured that the code
> accessing the variable did not migrate from one CPU to another and soon
> this was noticed by Tiejun Chen in 94b09d755462 ("powerpc/hugetlb:
> Replace __get_cpu_var with get_cpu_var"). So we had it fixed.
>
> Christoph Lameter was doing his __get_cpu_var() replaces and forgot
> PowerPC. Then he noticed this and sent his fixed up batch again which
> got applied as 69111bac42f5 ("powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses").
>
> The careful reader will noticed one little detail: get_cpu_var() got
> replaced with this_cpu_ptr(). So now we have a put_cpu_var() which does
> a preempt_enable() and nothing that does preempt_disable() so we
> underflow the preempt counter.
>

Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V 

> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt 
> Cc: Christoph Lameter 
> Cc: Michael Ellerman 
> Cc: 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
> ---
> v1…v2: - use get_cpu_var() instead of get_cpu_ptr()
>- correct indentation of put_cpu_var()
>
>  arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index 744e24bcb85c..4a811ca7ac9d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -414,13 +414,13 @@ static void hugepd_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void 
> *hugepte)
>  {
>   struct hugepd_freelist **batchp;
>  
> - batchp = this_cpu_ptr(&hugepd_freelist_cur);
> + batchp = &get_cpu_var(hugepd_freelist_cur);
>  
>   if (atomic_read(&tlb->mm->mm_users) < 2 ||
>   cpumask_equal(mm_cpumask(tlb->mm),
> cpumask_of(smp_processor_id( {
>   kmem_cache_free(hugepte_cache, hugepte);
> -put_cpu_var(hugepd_freelist_cur);
> + put_cpu_var(hugepd_freelist_cur);
>   return;
>   }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.0

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev